Is our universe really a collection of dead matter, which by accident these atoms just collide to each other and form things?
OR is our universe is something that is alive, that is be created by thoughts of a supreme intelligent being?
Gee, dan. I dunno. Did god do all this just by thinking? Didn’t he have to wave his hand or something , too? It’s a good question, though. Hope someone comes up with the answer. It’ll be a real corker if someone does.
Do our bodies hold themselves together by accident? I would suggest the Universe is one tremendous interaction, and is very much aware.
=D>
Think of the universe as a beating heart.
It it expands to its limits then retracts back in on itself.
As it retracts back in on itself it becomes nothing, the counter point to nothing is something so it goes outward again. Its a never ending cycle if you think about it.
I would even go so far as to say that the universe would be contained within a perpetual multiverse containing an infinate number of universes all operating on the same principles as our own universe.
Sonata~
If the universe is like a heart.
IS it not the universe is exhaling, then soon it must inhale.
OR perhaps I am just a corker.
Pssst. Dan.
DAN…
DAN!.
Inhaling and exhaling. That’s the lungs, dude. The heart is distole and pistole. Or beat and rebeat. Somethin’ like that. Anyway, it’s not inhale and exhale.
Just bein’ a friend.
Faust
Faust
Faust. is that the name of the medicine doctor in guility gear?
ne ways u get the point.
In order for a cell to divide, it needs DNA RNA and many other perciece forces to reproduce.
How could the first cell have been created? Not by chance occuracnes without the perciece force. What perciece force is possiable?
I have often said that DNA is a connection for the soul because of the connection identical twins share after being split appart at birth. Maybe since God works on such small levels, we can not grasp God’s capability.
Dan - I don’t know. It’s the name my parents gave me. Is guilty gear the name of a sex toy catalog?
I thought it was the name of an opera or, a character in an opera … or, something?
Aren’t, like, you, like, part of the universe and stuff?
I mean since we’re alive and all - pretty difficult then for the universe to be dead - no?
Faust is just a video game for me. But nice name, does it have any meaning?
So what are you saying the universe is a cell? That is why it is expanding? Or it is dead like a block of ice which is mealting away?
What are you talking? What twins? How is this a connection of the soul? What is a soul?
Good point what do yourself think? IF the universe is not dead, must it be alive? Must it have a soul to itself?
I think it’s alive. I further think that that’s the only valid perspective, since, in order to ‘know’ one must be alive - so there really is no sense in speaking of anything which one knows oneself to be part of, to be dead.
This sounds in many ears illogical, or inverse reasoning, but that is because men are trained to think away from themselves, as if they are not the measure of their thoughts. This needs to be inversed if one would desire to actually know in a way that correlates with being. ‘to know’ and ‘to be’ must be experienced simultaneously before one can practice natural science
Once one learns to consequently think and reason within oneself, which is the only productive modus of thought, issues such as a universe composed of elements which are in themselves abstract becomes absurd.
There is no relation of life to the abstract except in the infinite ways in which that which can be seen as abstract when abstracted from life, IS life.
Or, simply; if one must live to understand - to ‘understand’ non-life is folly
In order for a cell to divide, it needs DNA RNA and many other perciece forces to reproduce.
How could the first cell have been created? Not by chance occuracnes without the perciece force. What perciece force is possiable?
…let’s not confuse the void of understanding with the significance of reality.
Plus, if life would be a coincidence, we’d fall apart 84908759348539045 out of 84908759348539046 times. I don’t think there’s any scientific argument to counter that. That does not make me a creationist who wants to topple Darwinism - Darwinism is valid in my eyes - but withhin a larger framerwork - that of self organization. Coopertation, for example, between living entities is much mor eimportant in the evolutionary process than competition.