meno41
Not only wasn’t fabricated story by people with little minds, but they really tried to screw over a person twice nominated for the Noble Prize.
Numerous sources say Belo’s behavior was an open secret in Timor Leste – and probably in Rome as well.
And here is an inquiry, currently screening, describing Pope Leo:
)(
https://www.youtube.com/live/VAhZoJu1kGo?si=SnrjFePiKeIvMPN0
Before anyone answers that question - you have some important information that might help them answer it..
Tell us ,since you know, what is it like to have a small dick AND a small brain?
But I’d like to explore this just on a philosophical level.
"I’m curious why we, when confronting the white-centered toxic masculinity of this culture, we are choosing to use the vernacular of that toxic masculinity.
Aren’t we just reinforcing the very thing we’re fighting against?
Little dick = bad. Big dick = good.
Little dick = weak. Big dick = strong.
Little dick = desperate. Big dick = resolved.
Isn’t that the message we’re sending here?
I see this in general conversations and social media interactions, too.
“What a sexist asshole. No doubt he has a micro dick and is trying to make up for his shortcomings.”
“Poor guy, spreading his little dick energy everywhere, cuz he knows he isn’t worth shit.”
“Dude, put away your male privilege. We all know you have a tiny dick — the jig is up.”
I question if this is a healthy approach. I don’t see how we can keep insisting that size doesn’t matter when we make statements like these, over and over, that so clearly illustrate that it does matter.
I think it’s so important to move away from this rhetoric about small dicks and little dick energy.
Men should not have to feel insecure about their penis size. Honestly, who the hell cares? If it gets the job done, what does size matter? And even if it doesn’t, there are fingers. There are toys.
Dicks are great, but they aren’t the be-all and end-all in the bedroom.
And maybe there would be less “little dick energy” in the world if we didn’t keep consciously and unconsciously shaming penis size…
While our culture gives men so many privileges, it also fails them on the most basic levels. It fails to uphold them, fails to honor or appreciate sacred masculinity, and fails to give them a good foundation on which to stand"
Penis Size & Toxic Masculinity, Y L Wolfe
You started it.
Noooo…you did
YOU DID !!! 
Did you watch it meno41?
I did, would like your opinion.
Catholics butcher baby penises, which is evil. At least Jews wait for 13 and consent (although the consent is peer pressure and manufactured.) SRS aoc should be 13 as well.
Anyway, Carleas can you split this thread cause its totally derailed in my opinion, people started talking about religion
Are you sure about that??
"These Catholic opponents of IMC put forward a number of arguments against the practice, of which three are particularly prominent. In the first place, it is argued that Catholics are forbidden from practicing circumcision “for any reason.” This teaching is said to be promulgated at the Council of Vienne (1311) and the Council of Florence (1438-1445) (Dietzen 2004; Lang 2011).
Infant Male Circumcision: A Catholic Theological and Bioethical Analysis - PMC).
Isn’t male circumcision a purely Jewish tradition, and female circumcision a purely Moslem tradition (both Semitic in origin, former slave branding techniques)?
I am talking about real life. It is Catholics that go around circumcising baby infants.
Most people are deranged psychopaths that do not care or even approve of the procedure. Most are only fit to be a slave.
If there are some Catholics who are denouncing the process, that’s a good thing.
.
The Catholic religion as a whole, do not circumcise males, of any age.. so what @RealUn said.
.
Where do people keep getting this notion from? ..first Satyr, and now you.
Do you not acknowledge the influence of the dead on the living? You make me laugh. Their knowledge, deeds, and work mean nothing to you?
()
The living dead should know by now, …
….why they are dead and not living, for fear of extinction.
Why is it that after immense conflict and it’s eventual resolution, that they are able to begin to act as if the understand at least …that they do have a definite, and absolute reason to carry on and live in harmony?
There IS ample proof for that proposition.
Why babble nonsense? “Living dead” are people subordinated to faith. And it doesn’t have to be religious faith. Faith kills or cripples the mind, turning a person into a controllable zombie. What is there to prove and why? It’s impossible to prove to a zombified person. A rational one will understand everything on their own. Faith is the instinct of herd mentality. Where one sheep goes, the other follows without thinking.
Sure, until one followed by a few realize that herds need to follow whoever proclaims that they are fated not for slaughter, or obsolescence, but to recreate and multiply, by transferring the transcending intuit.
The babble until reminded to this magical mystery, that has been called instinctive.
Well, it’s not that simple. People are tools of knowledge. If they lose their purpose, they are stimulated by natural cataclysms, epidemics. And if that doesn’t help—nuclear war.
I get that but they can intuit a purpose wrongly(not their fault, if they fault themselves and try to repent as a consequence, ) but then purpose is then determined by unknown ( to them) passions and or reasons) and that such reasoning makes contingent the apparent neccisity of a pre-arranged structural survival kit,
Which
bevoes invisible and nihil at first, ) future shock ( then Aquarius aged, sends hermetic signals ( make America great ( -again, and that structural quasi hologrammatical logic becomes ever more clear, as memory is perennially seeks to be modally accepted.
the heart no longer beats, your breath stops and your brain stops functioning.
is entirely different from
Refering to the venerating of saints again. I dont believe there is a connection between the living and the departed, as seen as the deceased has a continued existence. if that is what you mean.
God forbids contact with the dead, to protect us from the Devil’s lies.
In the Tibetan Book of Dead “No sane person fears nothingness”.
