what is to be done?

In the long line of prior attempts, Tolstoy and Lenin and
Chernyshevsky, I ask, given the nature of reality today,
“What is to be done?”

Is salvation to be found in the political, social, religious,
economic, moral or philosophically realm …

To find solutions, one must correctly sense out the issues, the problems
facing us today…UR and gLOOM claim that all our problems stem
from a series of conspiracies that doom us…what a narrow vision
of our world…what of our moral/ethical issues that seem to
dominate both our personal and political/economic lives.

Their, UR/gLOOM, efforts seem to avoid religious, moral,
philosophical, economic and political solutions in their understanding
of, ‘‘What is to be done?’’ Their entire focus is on dubious conspiracy
theories that have no basis in reality. What solutions can be found
in tilting at windmills? I have no idea and clearly neither do they.

The answer to the question of ‘‘What is to be done?’’ requires
a firm understanding of the issues facing us…

The conservative often claims that the solution lies in a return
to religious/moral/ ethical concerns… but does that concern
put food on my table? Does that ethical/moral concern solve the vast
economic problems facing the world… does a moral/ethical concerns
solve global warming, for example? Or finds an answer to the deep
social, political divisions within America?

They might long term, but what of today, right now?

Does they answer lie in creating new laws or new standards, politically,
or does the answer lie in us socially, morally, ethically?
are we to understand “what we are to do?” in terms of the political,
or the social or the religious or the economic? Is the answer found
in us individually or in us collectively?

but as I pointed out, the answers can only be found if, if we ask
the right questions as to what is the “real” problem/problems of
our modern times…or to be blunt, who and/or what is to blame for
our massive issues facing us to today? Once we can assign blame,
we can then and only then seek out answers to this existential problems
of existence…

and how does this overall question of “what is to be done?” relate to us
as individuals in regard to the Kantian questions of existence,
“What am I to do?” “What should I believe in?” “What can I know?”
“What should I spend my energy on?”

and how do the Kantian questions of existence relate to us
in terms of us collectively and the question of “what is to be done?”.
“What are we to do?” “What should we believe in?” “What can we know?”
“What should we spend our energy on?”

the question of “what am I to do?” is directly related to the question
of “what is to be done?” the answer to one leads us to the answer to
the other…

so, are we going to reform the government, or big business, the society,
ourselves, individually and/or collectively? So “what is to be done?” requires
us to engage in this question of examining our lives, both individually
and collectively…so it becomes a Socratic question…the answer also lies
in the Socratic answer of ‘‘know thyself’’

‘‘So, what is to be done’’?

Kropotkin

Here’s one thing to be done:

  1. Stop slandering and lying about me. I never said or implied “all our problems” come from insert conspiracy theory.

Very few problems come from “the top down” because those at the top generally keep societies and world economics running smoothly. But when problems do come from the top (forced vaccination of the entire human population), then yes, it is a big problem.

Secondly, you say “our problems” as if you and I share anything in common. This is another intellectual-dishonesty. Your problems are not mine, and mine are not yours, until you ceaselessly lie about what I say, and then premise your arguments on those lies, and then use those conclusions as a personal Ad Hom attack. Then “the problem” becomes you slandering me.

K: ahhh, so we have absolutely no collective/universal problems affecting us?
and yet, you claim to know about a worldwide conspiracy theory that is taking
away our freedoms? and there is no such thing as income inequality or global warming,
or worldwide pollution problem? there are no universal/global problems/issues
affecting every single human being on planet earth…and yet you, a holder
of a worldwide conspiracy theory, that holds to a conspiracy theory that affects
every single person on planet earth… you believe
there are no issues affecting all of us? How strange…that you
hold a universal/worldwide conspiracy theory and yet deny in any sort
of worldwide/universal problems affecting all of us…

Kropotkin

Again and again try convincing the would anarchist that if the underlying issues facing civilization are mere groundless epithets, the very revolutionists who would die for any clue that would signal some change away from their own sense of alienation , …just find any cause around which thy could rally around-----

Forgetting the lost lessons of history that they forgot or denied to their brethren; lessons of the newley schooled generation, who have to recover to truly learn to use ;

…??then if reversal of time could undo those missed lessons, then perhaps hundreds of millions of babes in arms could have been prevented from throwing away their lives.

So it’s all-or-nothing? All problems, or no problems?

READ WHAT I WRITE. Humanity has SOME problems from the top-down, including this attempt to forcibly-vaccinated the whole of humanity.

If you don’t see a problem with that, on top of the fact that the public doesn’t even know what’s in this shit, then… you cannot be helped nor saved.

Hey PK…

If these vaccines are so good and safe, why has Japan banned them??? Let’s hear it.

‘World wide conspiracy theories exist because analogously , there are some, who disbelieve the naturalistic fallacy’ , that facts are reduceable to principles.

The alienated and disaffected, are muted by contradictory effects of nihilized political underpinnings, .

For instance, why the assassination of Trotsky, or the supposed murder of Stalin by his doctors?
Closer to home: why the yet to solved assassination of JFK?

K: Of course doing any homework is simply out of the question…
had you done so, you would have seen that Japan banned Moderna, not
the other ones as two, YEP, two children died, maybe from the vaccine,
maybe not…I have taken the moderna shot, as has millions of others,
and I will be taking the booster shot in a few weeks… unlike you,
I am not afraid of everything… and what is UR afraid of?

vaccines, colored people, women, intelligence, liberals, government,
critical race theory, being educated, science, medicine, reason, logic,
homosexuality, terrorism, socialism, the UN, anarchism, hugo chavez,
muslims, peace, puppies, al gore, fun, Obama, love, renewable energy,
and I am sure I missed a few… it is sad to see someone so dominated
by fear that they are afraid of absolutely everything…

Kropotkin

So you don’t know why Japan banned them.

I understand your ignorance.

They banned them because they kept finding “foreign metals” in them. What are those “foreign metals”? They are graphene-oxide components, along with graphene quantum dots. Nano-technology.

What is to be done:

Refuse. Go hungry. Die. There’s More.

If anything happens against your refusal:

Refuse what it’s still possible to refuse. Think & act YOUR thoughts, ignore (or love… as enemies) the rest.

K: I actually answered your question…sorry that doesn’t fit into your
preconceived, already held bias…

Kropotkin

You dodged my question. You did not tell me why Japan banned them. So I told you. And now you know.

K: Of course doing any homework is simply out of the question…
had you done so, you would have seen that Japan banned Moderna, not
the other ones as two, YEP, two children died, maybe from the vaccine,
maybe not…I have taken the moderna shot, as has millions of others,
and I will be taking the booster shot in a few weeks… unlike you,
I am not afraid of everything… and what is UR afraid of?

K: question asked and question answered…

Kropotkin

Then a very small minority would set up a shrine for you and your brethren, and develop a myth about the whole school of thought( quickly feigned away) and revised into a money making scheme.

There are veritably large numbers of shrines set up in the streets of Los Angeles, in memory of kids shot by drive by shooting, set up by their grieving parents.

So what would a deluded person gain by a too proximate likeness to Gandhi, for instance, now days.

and so to return to the question at hand,

given the problems that exists in the world, what are we to do?

is the answer in the social or political or the philosophical or the
economic or in securing moral/ethical answers to the questions
facing us… how do we solve the wide-ranging questions facing us?

Kropotkin

votervoice.net/mobile/IFAPR … 90/respond

I had this up for a day and yet no real response to
the question at hand… what are we to do?

I think the question relies on an understanding that no specific
answer will suffice… for example, one might say, “ban abortion”
or “don’t get the virus shot” but I am not talking about a specific action
for a specific problem…most people here are single issue people,
and any one single issue isn’t going to change the needle here…

I guess what I am aiming for isn’t about single actionable issues, but
more about changing mindsets… it isn’t about global warming but
really about our attitude and understanding of global warming…
for there to be a change in specific actions, we need to change
our mindset and understanding of any given situation…it isn’t about
global warming per se as much as how we approach global warming…
let us use, as an example, one might have a bad habit… say,
gambling… done occasionally, for fun, there is nothing wrong with
gambling… I have done so, played blackjack at some casino’s…
quarters in the slot machine… no big deal… but what if, what if
someone gets so caught up in gambling they become addicted to it…
they spend their days and nights thinking about gambling and then
they spend long hours and a lot of money gambling…
so how would one change that?

the approach is actually a mental one, not a physical one… the battles
we face, the demons that drive us on are not physical ones, but they
are mental ones… we can think our way into bad habits, and we can think
our way out of bad habits…by a change in our understanding and mindset
about gambling…we might be physically addicted to something but the
answer to overcoming that addiction isn’t just physical, it is mental,
it is a change in the mindset of people…think about AA… Alcoholics
anonymous… read their “rules” and see that we can’t overcome our
drinking problems with a physical action, we must overcome it with
a changing mindset and a changing understanding of why we drink…
it is a process and a process is a mental one…

so to overcome our numerous issues, requires a changing
mindset and a change in how we understand these issues…

think back to the Roman Empire… we know that in, roughly, 1 bc,
a child was born… now some think that child was a god, a savior,
others do not… but what matters is that it wasn’t a physical change
that drove the Roman citizens who turned from the old ways, the old
religions to the new ways, the new religions…yes, the Middle ages were
different from the old Roman Empire, but it was a mindset,
a change in the way the approached life and heaven that
changed…

if there is a change between the old Roman/Greek civilizations,
and today, it lies within how we approach something…
read Plato and Aristotle and see how the Christians of the Roman
empire approach their existence… and we can see the difference in
that when they choose an ideology, a path into the future, they
took it as a way of life… for the early Christian, Christianity wasn’t
just a choice that was a weekly engagement at the church for an hour or two…
for the early Christian, Christianity was an engagement with a way of life…
and for the Greeks, accepting philosophy was not as a intellectual game
as we play it, but it is philosophy as a way of life… to live a life of philosophy
by moment to moment every single day…that is a mindset to make philosophy
or the Christian church the values by which we live our lives…

not on any given Sunday, but every day 24/7/365…

part of the problem with today is our casual engagement with the ideals
and understanding of today… we playact at having a democracy instead
of an engagement with democracy 24/7/365…
it isn’t something we can take it and leave it… it becomes a permanent
and lasting work in progress… a process that takes us from birth to death…
we need a change in our mindset to a real commitment to democracy…
we can’t just playact democracy, we must engage with it 24/7/365…
as a way of life…and some might say, we owe it to the past to hold
onto democracy as way of life, but I say something differently,
we must hold onto democracy as a way of life for ourselves and
our children… our engagement with democracy isn’t about our past,
but is about our future… and who are we to be today and tomorrow…
and to those who are actively rooting against democracy, like UR and Observe
and gLOOM, (if you root for IQ45, you are rooting against democracy…
Jan 6, 2021 shows us that) you have set yourself against democracy…
but one cannot, cannot engage with a dictatorship as a way of life…
for dictatorships don’t stand for anything outside of blunt power for
the dictator…a look at history tells us that dictatorships like Stalin
and Mao are not about any high-minded principles, but they are in fact,
simple pursuits of power, nothing more…now the follower may have
ideals in their mindset, but their supreme leader doesn’t have that
ideal in their head… look at ancient dictatorships like Caesar or Augustus,
they only had, as their guiding principles, their engagement with power
as their guiding principles… nothing so grand as the improvement of
the state or any improvement in the lives of the citizens… just as
IQ45 only guiding principle is “l’etat, c’est moi” … “I am the state”
and where do you fit into this guiding principle of IQ45?

we must lift our eyes from our daily burdens and see existence
from a much larger perspective… we must see existence from
a bird’s eye view, not see it from our current perspective which is
as ants, ants looking up at the world…our daily grind is such that
we no longer have any perspective one what it means to be human…

and the only way we can change that is by changing our understanding
and mindset of how we view existence/reality… the path into
the future isn’t by actions taken, but in changing our mindset
and how we understand the world and what it means to be human…

the world can only change if we change how we view it…

Kropotkin

we need to think about where we are and where
we want to be… what possible future should we be
aiming for and just as importantly, why that future?

what political systems should we engage with?
what economic systems should we engage with?
what social and cultural systems should we engage with
and with all three, we must ask, why those systems
and not another…

we must have an engagement with an examination of
who we are and what does it mean to be human AND
what systems, economic, political, social and culturally
match our understanding of what that examination
of existence leads us to…

so, one possibility, that isn’t discussed in America, is thinking
about existence in terms of the moral/ethical possibilities
available to us… see life in terms of our ethical and moral
possibilities instead of our economic or political as we do
today… people will say, Abortion is unethical or immoral,
but that is that single issue mindset at work… instead
we should subsume abortion into an overall understanding
of what it means to be human by ethical or moral standards…

we see moral issues as abortion or the death penalty, not as single
issues problems but within a whole understanding of what it means
to be ethical or moral…morality/ethics becomes an entire subject
to itself… how are we to act ethically, morally given what we know
about human beings?

and we see abortion and the death penalty as part of the overall
understanding of what it means to be an ethical/moral person…

we no longer see abortion or the death penalty as a single-issue problem,
but as a overall, comprehensive understanding of what it means to be human…
we act or see abortion or the death penalty as part of a new mindset,
or a new understanding of what it means to be human… not part of
a single-issue problem, but within the overall vision of how we should
act or be or engage with our fellow human beings and, AND
with our fellow beings of life… Once we see dogs and cats
and cows and bee’s and even grass or tree’s as just different
type of life, us, but not exactly us…for we are genetically related to
dogs and cats and cows and fly’s and grass and bee’s… they are just us
in different forms… so, we understand ourselves not as isolated
human beings, who only exists in isolation to everything else,
but as a part of the whole, as part of an entire ecosystem…
we exists as part of nature, not in isolation of nature…
we are part and parcel of nature… we are nature and we
are part of nature… there is no us and them, there is only us…

and this makes all the difference in the world… in how we see
ourselves will dictate how we act and respond to the world…
this new vision of who we are and what is possible changes
our actions and our possibilities…

I am not an isolated human being… I am part and parcel of
all human beings who have existed, who do exists, and who
will exist… and I am part of nature, as nature itself and
what stands within nature…the fields and mountains
and streams and sea’s… are all part of me… as I am part of them…

we see existence as a connection to everything… for we are
part of everything… and in this we can and must change our mindset
that we are apart and exist separately from everything else…
I don’t exist separately from that which is outside of me,
I exists within and as part of everything I can see…

I am everything and everything is me…

so how do we get from where we are now to where
we need to be? seeing existence as being part of us
and us being part of existence…

that is the human question we must face…

Kropotkin

so how are we to be saved? it depends upon our answer to
what it means to be human.

is human existence really the existence we live today, nothing more
then ants spending our days and nights hurrying about, not noticing
or seeing the world outside of our little ant farm…

in our daily grind to create a better economic world, but in reality that
means we are creating wealth for our corporate overlords… what
about us working for us, creating wealth for us and our children?
Right now, our engagement isn’t about creating a better or a more
moral/ethical or a future worth living in, no, we are just
creating wealth for our economic overlords… and doing nothing
for us and our engagement with what it means to be human…
to be ethical or to be moral isn’t an economic question, it is
a question about what it means to be human…

the economic belief that we are economic beings is simple false
and part and parcel of both capitalism and communism…
we are greater then just economic beings… we are social
and political and moral/ethical and culturally and
philosophical beings… our lives isn’t just about the creation
of wealth or property… we are greater than that… but
who exactly is saying that we have more value then
just being workers, producers and consumers…

our value as human beings is greater than an economic one,
we have value as creator of values like peace, love, hope,
charity, justice… we have value as creators of our moral
and ethical values which we see as our possibilities as human beings…

to be ethical, to be moral is to see how we can connect to other
human beings… as I see justice, equality as being one and the same,
I see existence as a question of an engagement with justice/equality…
I don’t see existence as a question of survival of the fittest,
but I see existence as a question of us working together to
create a better and more moral/ethical future for all of us
and our children…existence is a question of seeking our
possibilities for what it means to be human,…
ethically, morally, politically, socially, culturally,
philosophically… I don’t sort out human beings as separate,
entities, but I do see human beings as being one and the same…

what changes in our mindset will it take before we see
human existence to be ‘‘us’’ instead of ‘‘me?’’

Kropotkin

what does it mean to be human?

does it mean to be, specific answers, does it mean
to be a Gandhi, or MLK or a IQ45 or Hitler… wait, I am being redundant,
or perhaps a Newton or an Einstein, or does being human simple mean
to be worker bee… to be a consumer, a producer or a worker…

does being human mean, we are really economic beings,
with no concern to ethical/moral problems… with no concern to
political or social concerns? are we to see being human as simple
by what we consume or make or buy and sell? Economically?

I see human beings as being greater than just economic beings
I see human being having an engagement with social, political,
philosophical, ethical and culturally issues… we are not just
homo economicus: economic beings…

we are also social beings, moral beings, philosophical and political
beings… and until we address that point, we cannot move forward to
become who we are… if we fixate on being economic beings, we
cannot address our ethical, moral, legal, social, political and philosophical
selves…our economic thoughts that we only exist as economic beings
has driven out any possibility of seeing ourselves as anything else

to become free of being solely economic beings we have to address
the other aspect of being human… the ethical/moral, social, political…etc…etc…

and when shall we do that?

Kropotkin