Your comment is redundant and nothing more than a cheap insult. If you really think he is boring then you don’t have to read his comments and can put him on ignore.
So what you have achieved is nothing but wasting your own time in a fruitless exchange
PN is saturated with imbeciles anyway, even moreso than ILP.
My attitude towards theism? As of late, I’m leaning to apatheism. I don’t find examining theism or anything religion-related seriously worth my time anymore… plenty of more interesting, and practically useful things to learn about.
There are two key nut jobs on PN.
This is a great shame because the publication is pretty good, but their Forum lowers the tone. A little more moderation might eventually attract serious thinkers.
One must focus on the meaning of the words, not the words themselves. Does “faggy” refer to a fear of homosexual males? Does it refer to a pile of sticks?
Faggy, root word “faggotry”. Usually alluding to a room of prebupesent females, whining and screaming at the top of their lungs, hitting each other with pillows and whining about which boy likes the other more. Bratty, feminine, dishonarable, ignorant behavoirs, such as hitting the block button, or hitting ignore. Faggotry.
Do homosexual males act like this. Some effette ones, do. Do I fear them? Do I fear homosexuality itself? Not so much as I find distaste towards the aesthetics. Not so much as I fear the mindset of prebuscent females, a mindset of dishonor, disloyalty, and ignorance, taking root and hold of an already broken society.
To call someone homophobic, would be such a simplification, a product of knee-jerk reactionarism, the very same mindset of faggotry. I suppose the modern’s next step, is to call me a bad person, because my sexual tastes find man on man sex, generally distasteful. The modern wishes to police other’s sexuality, and yet, have the audacity to claim the other is the bigot who wishes to police sexuality, simply for having common sexual preferences.
Dear Lord. You couldn’t even comprehend the last post I wrote. It was only 4 measly paragraphs, in a cascaded order, with barely any lines in the first paragraph.
The topic is simple enough.
It has nothing to do with who is superior and who is ‘bad’ in some way or another.
This theme of ad homs isn’t just happening in the religion area of the forum.
People get all pissy in the other areas of the forum also.
It’s fruitless. It’s as lame as watching TV.
Fact of the matter is, he didnt seem to grasp the meaning of my post. Thus, he did not comprehend it. There’s no easy way to say it without hurting his feelings, especially someone so delicate and modern as he.
Let’s have a first interim result for the question: “What is your attitude towards theism?”:
I am a theist: 3 => 33%.
I am an antitheist: 1 => 11%.
I am a syntheist (synthesis of a theist and an antitheist): 1 => 11%.
I am an atheist: 2 => 22%.
I am no theist, no antitheist, no syntheist, and no atheist: 1 => 11%.
I do not know: 1 => 11%.
Fortunately, that is not the case. Unlike many intellectuals, I neither starts examining things keeping a preferred answer In mind, nor let my ego to overrule me in conclusions.
But, this does not mean I do not have any opinions. Yes, I certainly have. But, I can look at things keeping that aside.
Secondly, it is not the case that I had not questioned myself. I was the first one to do so. And, that went for years, thousands of times, and every time I found myself getting the same answer.
That is only why I consider it true. And, I still do not mind changing it for better option, if I ever find any. It does not take me long to realize and accept my mistakes openly.
Seems there’s an element here who can’t go 16 words without dropping in a “retard,” “idiot” or “faggot” into their post. I quite literally do not understand it.