Man children, and pedants, dusty bookworms who don’t go out much.
Manufacturing complexities that often miss the boat.
Their understanding of existence is inadequate.
One of the worst philosopher’s of all time is Riley Bowen. She is a transgender ex-heroine addict who is a stuffy pedant who knows next to nothing other than what she regurgitated in books. Sophist.
In fact, philisophers are so deeply idiots that they often ignore their most profound and spiritual states. Their mind, entrapped in branches and leaves, spreading outward manufacturing logical complexities. Dancing but never denting.
People do not take philosophy seriously, because even feminine pop-psychology has more clear cut ideas. Although, people do not take pop-psychology serious because of it’s iron fist, and it’s tendency to manufacture complexities.
I am not impressed by those who manufacture complexities, nor those who build machines. They are man-children with branches and leaves.
I find the opposite is truer. Perhaps the complexities arise from a deeper vision of our very complex reality. I’d admit I for one don’t go out much, I tend not to like ‘attractions’, if a place is a place to go, then its not a place to go ~ its an outsider/punk thing, we always tried to make our own lives up, and i’m stuck in that somehow. I suppose some detachment goes with being reflective and observing. You’d prefer people to be less deep and knowing?
How do you know whether or not the ‘man-child’ is in fact the pinnacle. What would be your alternative? Consider;
the masculine reaches a crescendo of strength, then tactics take over ~ the feminine ultimately triumphs, given that order of things. I personally don’t agree with the whole nietzschean schemata, the mind is more permeable than sexual and other power strata.
You aren’t a sophist though. You weren’t what I was talking about in the post. You don’t like reading faff or wots.
Philosophy is largely pretentious. Like, if I sat down with a philosopher for an hour, I would have a much better deeper understanding than reading some pretentious book they wrote in 5 days, we could cut the crap and also have them thinking about all the flaws they wrote while they try so desperately try to sound wordy.
Bullshit. I want people to be more deep and knowing, less reliant on faff, wots, and less like politicians manufacturing pretentious complexities.
Never said man child was pinnacle. Masculine femininity refers to energies masculine is less sensitive, feminine is more sensitive. Because of this, feminine is less mentally direct and creates schemes to avoid that which she fears.
Dueling is feminine. But I have changed my views. I think dueling is a good thing.
Dueling arises using from a hurt heart or ego (feminine.) But it is masculine to face ones fears. I promote a hermaphroditic society with reasonable rules. Today’s world is unreasonable, with many rules. Meanwhile, so called philosophers just sit and twiddle their thumbs with wordscramble while actual interesting things are ignored, such as the Dna machine or the Consciousness Solution Device ™.