as far as I can tell, the radical right wants to turn
the U.S into a theological state like Iran…where
everything is viewed in a religious context…
where woman are viewed to be subservient to men,
where their only value is to be “pregnant, barefoot
and in the kitchen” that is what the religious radical right want…
and they have taken Iran as their role model…
where instead of an “Islamic theocracy” we have a
''Christian theocracy" and to follow Iran in being
authoritarian, anti-democratic, with systematic human rights abuses
against gays, trans, women, minorities, and atheists…
That is the America that the radical religious right wing want…
they have said, and you have read it here in ILP from radical religious
types like UR, that they want to kill or imprison gays, trans, minorities,
“commies”… basically anyone who doesn’t believe exactly what they
believe… prison and death to all, who fail the purity test…
but they have gone so right wing that even Ronald Raygun,
is too far left wing… … that is how far into being radical the
right wing has gone…Raygun is a flaming liberal…
what America do you want? is a theological political state
really what you want? The only way you can get a job or
receive benefits is to be a religious follower? is that the
America you want? I don’t… I favor the constitution where
we have the freedom to free speech and the freedom
to engage in religious freedom as we see fit, not as we are told
or demanded we must engage in…
What the left wants is for a single totalitarian government to rule the entire world. WEF already predicts that, by 2030, you will own nothing and be happy. Literally, what they are saying is that, your sole task will be to do whatever you are told to do while everything else will be taken care of by them.
well, lets see, who has ended women’s choice?
who has attempted to overthrow the 2020 election?
who has advocated death to gay and trans people?
who has taken away the rights of women?
who has tried to limit voting rights to blacks?
who has run on culture war stuff for decades?
who has tried to take away the rights of gays?
who has tried to take away the rights of trans people?
who has tried to bring guns to anyone in America
including the mentally ill, and those who have committed violence
to their spouse, domestic violence?
who has called as “fake news” climate change?
who has called as “fake news”, covid 19?
In every case, it has been the radical right wing…
whereas you have no evidence for your claim…
but I have plenty of evidence for my statement…
just read the news…
Human Rights come from the Christian God. You have no ‘Rights’ without God. It’s obvious you have never read the Bill of Rights.
Pedophile groomers and perverts would be imprisoned, yes.
Minorities would be segregated into ethnic and racial enclaves around the country. Demographics and illegal immigration would be stopped immediately, and illegals deported.
Multi-culturalism has proved to be a complete and utter failure. All it produces is anti-white, anti-male hatred and contempt, and then, civil strife and civil war.
By the way, it’s not “the radical right” who wants the above, it’s the vast majority of Americans and anybody with common sense.
It’s common sense to want beautiful, successful, healthy, patriarchal families. Only anti-white, anti-male, anti-american, communists, do not want this.
Only the radical-left, hate what is good, beautiful, and normal.
Noone. You are overreacting. Overturning “Roe vs Wade” isn’t ending women’s choice. Women’s choice will be ended once individual states decide to end it, and even then, it will only be ended in some of the states (e.g. the red states.) Obviously, what you want is for the entire US, and even world, to be forced into obeying pro-abortion laws.
Do you even know what WEF is? Have you seen their ads? They openly state that “By 2030, you will own nothing and be happy”. It’s not a conspiracy, let alone a conspiracy theory, it’s out in the open. By 2030, all of your rights will be conditional upon you being a “good citizen” where by “good citizen” I mean a citizen who’s useful to them i.e. who does what he’s told to do. They will be the ones deciding everyone’s fate: when you’re born, what you do and when you die. There will no longer be any freedom, but to compensate for that, they will make sure that everyone will be happy. For example, if for whatever reason they decide to get rid of you, they will make sure you enjoy the process. Isn’t that great? They do not even bother to hide behind ideas such as “collective ownership” and “Everything will be owned by everyone”. They outright tell you that you will own nothing. Everything will be owned by them – the elite – and everything you use will be rented from them. And to make things worse, you won’t be able to pay them with your money – even if you had it and it was worth something by that time. The only way to pay them is by doing the specific thing they want you to do. That sort of thing is already being implemented in China. They call it “social credit system”. Note that China, like every other communist country, is anti-religious.
Never forget the little children who selflessly continue to give up their lives to protect your right to bear arms.
Their struggle to continually give up their lives is an unending task.
Guns overtook car crashes to become the leading cause of death for US children and teenagers in 2020, new research shows.
Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) shows that over 4,300 young Americans died of firearm-related injuries in 2020.
[b]
In other News.
Apparently some clown publicly thanked Trump for the repeal of Roe Vs Wade for saving “WHITE LIVES”
In any event, anybody that wished to achieve this would have to prove that it contravenes no law from the constitution on down.
In practice, however, certain policies currently in place supported by the Democrat party and institutions such as the Koch bros. do institute these segregated communities, by tolerating illegal immigration for the purposes of lower wage work than is currently allowed for citizens or legal residents or by creating a new category of legal immigration which grants only the rights required for the constitution of these segregated communities, but not more.
Segregation already exists throughout America, the United States, but just not explicitly.
White Far-Leftist Liberals, for example, and like PK, immerse themselves in predominantly “white” enclaves and school districts, and then preach about the benefits of multi-culturalism and “integrated” societies for others. They don’t practice what they preach. They do the opposite. The “minorities” they allow within their own communities are heavily white-washed and examined for purity tests, hence “social justice warriors”. Minorities and POCs who do not pass the “purity tests” are excluded, ridiculed, and even more overt “racism” placed-upon them by Liberal-Lefty-Democrat establishments.
This is why the radical left cannot be taken seriously when it comes to “racism”, with such obvious, flagrant, moral hypocrisies and lies.
This is also why the radical left outright censors and bans discussions around Crime, Criminality, and Race statistics. They flee from these harsh truths.
Stating the obvious, what a radical leftist like Kropotkin calls “radical right”, is just the Center position in Western Civilization.
There are no real “radical Right” political institutions still in practice. These would be examples of German National Socialism, or, not ironically, the Democrat Southern institutions of Slavery. Kropotkin and other radical-leftists also cannot face the fact that their ‘Democrat’ party was, and still is, the Slavery Party. They allow no ideological diversion or alternative freedoms. A black person cannot “vote Republican”, to them:
National Socialism is socialism. I am afraid to tell you it is also far left. Its main postulation is the collectivization of society under the control of government and the removal of individual rights. That is what leftism is.
Otherwise, in terms of your usual neighbourhood, if a person that is not visibly European and has not been white washed has enough money to buy a house and move in, nobody can stop them. This happens often.
However people end up organizing themselves in neighbourhoods and other locations is their own business. If things approaching the enclaves you mention naturally occur, because certain people prefer to live there and certain others prefer not to, that is neither here nor there. The quesiton is about government enforcement of segregation, which would constitute the government organizing people rather than them organizing themselves, and would of course be prohibitied from many angles by the constitution, the bill of rights, and several other lesser laws.
Interestingly, one big reason that self-segregated enclaves still exist, though not the only reason, is that the government pays their inhabitants monthly installments of money directly to stay in those places while abstaining from entrpreneurial work that might altr the enclave or cause them to leave it.
You are, of course, right about the positions of the Democrat and Republican parties respectively regarding slavery and “race.”