What would compel someone to?

What would compel someone to commit any sexual acts whatsoever with a, “child.”

As recently popularized by the Dateline NBC show, “To Catch a Predator,” child molestation, (or the attempting thereof) have been one of the crimes people have been most arrested for in the last few years.

Whether it be, rape, sodomization, statutory rape, child molestation, soliciting a child or whatever you want to call it, why would anyone do it?

1.) Everyone, or nearly everyone, is aware of the consequences. Aside from the fact that an individual (presuming he/she pleads not guilty) will almost never be found not guilty, people are still commiting this crime.

2.) The prison stay is much worse for a child molester, I mean, these are the people that make stone-cold hard-hearted inmates sick! So, if you’re a guy, you will go to jail and be anally raped until your anal crevice resembles tapioca pudding.

3.) Nobody will protect you. In jail, a person can usually join up with some gang or another to the extent that if that person gets messed with, the person messing with them is going to deal with the whole group; that’s not the case with child molesters. Even the prison guards are less likely to jump in if someone starts beating the living shit out of you.

4.) It’s, like, the easiest crime in the world NOT to commit. What other crime short of murder, robbery, grand theft auto, etc. has clearer lines. If she/he is 18, hit it, if not, then don’t! It really is that simple!

I understand that some people have psychological this and that that causes their attraction to minors, mostly to young children, but at some point, doesn’t logic have to take over? Again, it is a very simple law not to break.

I have no problem with the Dateline show simply because there is no entrapment, there is no questionable legality involved in catching these guys. Look, you’re talking to a thirteen year-old on the internet, she’s bullshitting about what shoes to get, and you come out with, “How would you like my cock in your mouth?” That’s not entrapment, that’s someone being a complete dipshit and getting caught.

My question is simply why? Why would someone commit a highly publicized, easily avoidable crime that follows you around, (in terms of having to register as a sex offender) the rest of your life even after you do your time, assuming you get out of jail alive?

Because those little girls are so innocent and controllable.

Smears is pretty succinct about what it boils down to. There are alot of pyscholigcal things involved but, crunch time comes, its about ego, power and control winning out over reason and intelligence.

It’s tight because it’s not fully formed . . .

I posted my solution to this issue in another forum a few days back. There is no rational reason. After all the speculation about the whys, the solution is simple. Anyone who would commit such an act needs to go away - permanently. Eventually, we might weed it out of the gene pool.

It may be two things, depending on the order in which things occur. It may be perversion, in the literal sense. The natural meaning of the sexual act is impregnation, and a child cannot get pregnant. So it is insensible and unnatural to feel the urge to impregnate or be impregnated by a child.

On the other hand, the social meaning of the sexual act is physical reassurance and consummation - sealing of the union - of love. As understanding or spiritual love may spark emotional love, so emotional love may spark physical, sexual love in an adult. But a child cannot understand the latter. Hence sexual love should always be based on emotional love based on understanding; otherwise there will be an unfair imbalance in the relationship.

It is absolutely despicable, and unacceptable. Anyone who would even
think about doing it. Shoud be shipped off to a deserted island. With blood
thirsty natives waiting for them!

You guys are all so politically correct. Jeez…

I think they should have their member removed.

I have good reason to believe Pavlovianmodel146 is in fact an under cover cop trying to find out potential molester to put on his register. The reason being the only people who can explain why are potential child molesters. It’s like asking someone why are some people gay? Only gay people can answer that question and the same logic applies here.

Malibu and Murex, this is not I Love Opinions. Nor is it the Rant House. You should at least motivate your opinions here. But even if you did, your comments would still be off-topic. The question is “why would anyone do it”, not “what do you think of people who do”.

That is so full of errors. you don’t need to be a molester to know why it is done. You can look at the reasons why you would not do it and you will get a good handle on why it is done. Only a gay person can answer why they are gay? No, that too is wrong. Its not hard to see why a person can be homosexual.

Side note:
Why is it when a thread that involves the discussion of child molestation, Homosexuality is always brought up? Why? That has to be the single most purposely provocative insulting bigoted dumba** linking argument I see on forums. The two are in no way connected, yet people insist on trying to bring the two together in one way or another.

Well, they are connected by the first reason I gave:

“It may be perversion, in the literal sense. The natural meaning of the sexual act is impregnation, and a child cannot get pregnant. So it is insensible and unnatural to feel the urge to impregnate or be impregnated by a child.”

Well, that depends on whether or not one agrees with that actually being the purpose of a sex-act. Given that non-human animals do, in fact, have sex for non-reproductive reasons, it would not be correct to say that procreation is the “natural” function of sex.

Unless, of course, you are appealing to the specific nature of humans. But especially there I would argue that sex has a wide range of expression, far too wide to suggest such a narrow role.

I distinguished between natural and social reasons. That non-human animals also have sex for social reasons does in nowise undermine my statement that the natural function of sex is procreation.

Indeed, and within that homosexuality fits the bill quite nicely in a way that child molestation does not. The two elements are both natural, the procreative and the social.

It is in so far as everything is natural. Nurture is natural, too.

If everything is natural, however, the term is completely meaningless.

Homophilia - love for members of the same sex - is not perverse, and I never said that it was. But homosexuality is perverse in so far as it is not sexual love, i.e., sexual desire sparked by emotional love.

shrugs I’m just saying that there is precedent for homosexual sex elsewhere which means that it isn’t purely a social thing. One could argue that something like shoe fetishism or BDSM are “unnatural” because they are purely social-sexual constructs. Finding a member of the same sex attractive is, on the other hand, as natural as finding a member of the opposite sex attractive. Incidence is, of course, a separate argument. And as I’ve said before, this is also independent of whether or not homosexuality is desirable (though I happen to think it is).

As for it not being sexual love . . . I’m not at all sure what you are talking about? Your statement makes zero sense, please try and re-frame it for me.

Likewise - to get back on-topic - pedophilia - love for children - is not perverse, either. But pedosexuality is perverse even if it is sexual love, that is, sexual desire sparked by emotional love, because the latter is not sparked by mutual understanding.

Ahhh, the problem is 99% of the people don’t distinguish between pedophilia and pedosexuality. They know them as the same.

Your definitions are correct but, when applied to normal conversations the two are not normally seperated they are thought of as the sexual. The linguistic acrobatic problems of having such a illdefined language for the average person must be taken into account when discussing such things.

If we all were raised and lived in the same areas we could understand each other more clearly. But, since we are different, we use english in different forms, idoms or phrases. Once in a while we get tripped up.