Where is civilisation heading?

faust,

Actually, just the opposite. It is the illusion that it can be managed that is doing the damage. That is why I was tongue in cheek about the definition of civilization. It’s whatever it is - or will be.

Still, I see one constant. Our rapid (on an evolutionary scale) reproduction rate. Even with all the potential set backs, we are slowly consuming not only the available resources, but damaging the systems that produce those resources. How slow or fast is irrelevent. No matter how grand the experiment, we seem to be an evolutionary dead end. There isn’t any way to prove that, and perhaps we’ll pull the rabbit out of the hat, but to discuss the future of civilization seems rather futile. The only thing I know with any certainty is that I won’t be around to see the conclusion, so civilization is whatever I happen to be doing at the moment. :wink:

Well, if it can’t be managed, why worry?

So, we are at an evolutionary dead end.

Just can’t get upset about that.

I don’t think it’s true, but I can’t get upset either way.

Last night I was managing the front of the house at the restaurant. I also tend bar and wait tables there, so people would ask me, “are you managing tonight?” My answer was, “Barely”.

Barely is good enough for me. The night ended, and so will the world. Just not on my shift.

Done and done. uhhh, could I get another beer? :slight_smile:

Perhaps the context of handwringing has changed since the Old Testament was written which might make it more significant. Just because the container of life has not yet tipped over does not mean it won’t. Still the question should not be “will it?” The question should be, “does it matter?”

tent - Yes. Draft or bottle?

DEB - I think the question “does it matter?” has precedence. Usually does.

Where is your bar faust? I think I will take up drinking so that I can finally kick the habit I think it matters; and I won’t be alone providing you guys let me sit at your table.

Tentative and Kriswest are currently drinking at the Acme CyberBar. I do not wish to be appointed bartender there because I wouldn’t be able to drink. Tending bar while drunk is like being on a very long chain. I like to be tied tighter than that, if I am tied at all.

I am secretly plotting a world tour, to eat, drink, and be philosophical with some of the crazy cats hereabouts. Stranger things have happened.

UH, several answers come to mind reading this thread

First, draft, when in doubt always take draft beer, then bottles,
then only if it is the last beer on earth and doomsday
5 minutes away, then a can.

OK next, civilization. Civilization, relationships, sharks,
all have to keep moving forward or they die. We have
stopped moving forward. Any civilization that has stopped
focusing on tomorrow has already died. And it comes back
to ideologies. Our ideologies have failed. Ideologies give
us a vision of the future and a means to achieve that vision.
We don’t have that right now. The British had that when they
began their great drive to being a world power. They had a
vision of where they wanted to go and a means to get there.
(world domination, via the sea, England ruled the world by
their domination of the sea) In the U.S. we had a theory
called “manifest destiny” We had a destiny to rule the
American continent, all we had to do was simply go get it.
And we did, by the millions, people went west and
conquered what they truly felt was theirs. They were
following the vision of “manifest destiny” The ideology
drove the vision and the vision overwhelmed a continent.
We have lost that ideology, that vision, (any vision for that
matter) and now the future is murky. We try to replace
failed ideologies with ideologies full of fear. We now have
fear and that drives the search for ideology. A country that
is upcoming, one that is on the move, has a positive vision,
a positive ideology about themselves and the world.
England during glory years, Rome and Greece during their glory
years, American during its long ago glory years, all had positive
upbeat, look to the future kind of ideologies. Then end of Rome
can be easily seen, when it adapted the negative, fear based
ideology of christianity. At that moment, the decline of Rome
is official, anything after that is waiting for the fall, which came
officially in 476, but was there a century earlier.
MY guess is in the future, historians will mark the end
of the American destiny with the election of Reagan in 1980.
Conservatism is an ideology of looking past, viewing the past
with greater support then the future, seeking in the past answers
to the future, supporting tradition instead of innovation.
The end of america lies there at that moment of
Reagan’s elections. When a countrie reaches back for answers
instead of going forward, it is dead, it is done.

I’m just waiting for the fat lady to sing.
Perhaps on American idol. :smiley:

Kropotkin

Kropotkin - sharks keep moving forward by definition. Relative to their environment, they often circle.

Jezz, I give the greatest analysis of western
civilization known to man and you quibble about sharks.

Gee whiz, what do I have to do to get an amen around here? :laughing:

Kropotkin

-Imp

I think civilisation is heading towards a point where every man will be listed under the name Dan.

Technology will ultimately lead to our undoing. Both computers and man will share a symbiotic relationship, such a dependence on each other, that the very concept of human nature will be wiped out.
We may still exist, but in a world, not unlike the matrix. I dont mean to say, humans will be slaves in a simulated world, but that we may opt for a virtual evironment over a natural one. This, I believe will produce a schizoid mentality, not to mention a shattered identity, when questions of “who am I?” become who also are these virtual characters that I’ve created for myself.
Instead of worshipping a God, we’ll send our praise to a computer progammer.
Instead of a computer matching our feelings, humans will be cold and detached and much like a machine. There are many unforseen elements to the virtual world, but I also believe that our concept of time will change, based on the fact that computers can make decisions in billionths of a second, below all our human perception. And the politics of time will seperate us from the true natural rhythms of our planet.

The sad thing is the word “progress” has such a positive connotation and commericals for super sleek gadgets have us believe the future tech world will be paradise. They say its inevitable. And most people adhere to it. [-X

Oh God how I’ve changed.

I cannot bare to image a world without the squiggly~

Peter, I’m with Imp all the way here. America has just begun it’s conquest of the world. There is nothing wrong with seeking answers from the past. Nietzsche did okay with it. Ronald Reagan was arguably the greatest of all american presidents. Time will tell. But manifest destiny was like moving a few fence posts compared to what America is doing now. And we aren’t even really trying that hard.

Huhhahah. :smiley: :laughing:

=D> Amen Brother Peter and Brothers Imp and faust. =D> As usual I find it impossible to choose sides. Both eloquently support my contention that we have no vision of what will happen if we don’t quit beating the shit out of each other with traditional ideologies, all of which have failed humanity.

Peter Kropotkin: OK next, civilization. Civilization, relationships, sharks,
all have to keep moving forward or they die. We have
stopped moving forward. Any civilization that has stopped
focusing on tomorrow has already died. And it comes back
to ideologies. Our ideologies have failed.

IMP: the only ideologies that have failed are socialism/communism"

K: Sure, Leninism, Maoism, stalinism have failed. But none of them
were Marxism as defined by Marx. Communism has never been tried
before. When Marxism as defined by Marx fails then you will be correct.

K: Ideologies give
us a vision of the future and a means to achieve that vision.
We don’t have that right now. The British had that when they
began their great drive to being a world power. They had a
vision of where they wanted to go and a means to get there.
(world domination, via the sea, England ruled the world by
their domination of the sea)

IMP: america has replaced England via mass media and economics"

K: thus missing my point. We did not become a superpower
with a vision of mass media and economics. We became a superpower
with a vision of settling the west and the outdated idea of manifest
destiny.

K: In the U.S. we had a theory
called “manifest destiny” We had a destiny to rule the
American continent, all we had to do was simply go get it.
And we did, by the millions, people went west and
conquered what they truly felt was theirs. They were
following the vision of “manifest destiny” The ideology
drove the vision and the vision overwhelmed a continent.
We have lost that ideology, that vision, (any vision for that
matter) and now the future is murky.

IMP: "wrong. we are (and will continue) shoving our manifest destiny and conquering all over the rest of the globe. nothing murky about it. "

K: Well lets see, how’s it going in Iraq and Afghanistan?
I see stunning success there. (attempted droll voice)

K: We try to replace
failed ideologies with ideologies full of fear. We now have
fear and that drives the search for ideology.

IMP: “the only ones filled with fear are the lefties that cling to failed socialist policies”

K: The bush’s failed presidency has been one of promoting fear.
Recall that Chaney said in 2004, “if kerry was elected we could
expect a nuclear bomb blast in America.” How is that not a fear tactic?

K: A country that is upcoming, one that is on the move, has a positive vision, a positive ideology about themselves and the world.
England during glory years, Rome and Greece during their glory
years, American during its long ago glory years, all had positive
upbeat, look to the future kind of ideologies.

IMP: “glory years”? LOL"

K: yep, glory years.

K:Then end of Rome can be easily seen, when it adapted
the negative, fear based ideology of christianity. At that
moment, the decline of Rome is official, anything after
that is waiting for the fall, which came
officially in 476, but was there a century earlier.
MY guess is in the future, historians will mark the end
of the American destiny with the election of Reagan in 1980.

IMP: "no, that was the end of the ussr and the totalitarian marxist/socialist dream.

K: Upon further review, reagan was a average president at
best, AT BEST. Again, the communism of the soviet union was
not communism of Marx, but of stalin and lenin. that failed.

K: Conservatism is an ideology of looking past, viewing the past
with greater support then the future, seeking in the past answers
to the future, supporting tradition instead of innovation.

IMP: then burn your gospels of Lenin, Stalin, Marx and any
of their past ideals"

K: I dislike Lenin, Stalin, Mao. I have made that very clear.
Someday, someone will try Marxism as advocated by Marx.
Alas, not in my lifetime. My lifetime has seen the death of
American democracy and freedom. 200+ years of the American
republic died within the last few years starting with the patriot act,
the theft of the elections, the NSA eavesdropping on america and
the silent destruction of the constitution, the illegal signing papers
of the village idiot.

K: The end of america lies there at that moment of
Reagan’s elections. When a country reaches back for answers
instead of going forward, it is dead, it is done.
I’m just waiting for the fat lady to sing.
Perhaps on American idol. :smiley:

IMP: “she sang when the Berlin wall fell but you refused to hear.”

K: she sang for the failed stalinism, not for america.
That is to come.

Kropotkin

faust: Peter, I’m with Imp all the way here. America has just begun it’s conquest of the world. There is nothing wrong with seeking answers from the past. Nietzsche did okay with it. Ronald Reagan was arguably the greatest of all american presidents. Time will tell. But manifest destiny was like moving a few fence posts compared to what America is doing now. And we aren’t even really trying that hard."

K: IMP is wrong. Pure and simple. Any who believe the world can
be conquered is wrong. Many, many have tried and they have
all failed. To a person, they have failed. Reagan was an average
president at best, clinton was far better in every measurable way.
And the village idiot is in the running for the worst president of all time.
We will fail in our attempt to conquer the world. And that failure will
doom future generations to piss poor lives of despair and poverty.
For our living high on the hog now, depends on future generations
to pay for it. Who will be saddled with the trillions of dollars of deficit
that exist right now and will grow into trillions more? Not me and
not you, but the children and grandchildren. We have already
squandered their inheritance in a remarkable shameful way. Our
legacy will be a poverty stricken america.

Kropotkin

Kropotkin - no one has conquered the whole world, but that’s not the point. We can try. But to say that everyone who has tried to build an empire has failed is just factually incorrect. They were not any of them permanent, but nothing is.

It is more likely that success will doom many to poverty. But many are doomed to poverty now. 'Twas ever thus. Ever 'twill be.

If you study the economics of the British Empire, you will seee that it got too expensive for them. But they didn’t wind up in poverty - many of their former colonies did. Many did not.

We were told that Reagan’s deficits would bury us. They didn’t.