And, I make the statement:
YOU CAN NEVER ANALYZE THE THING THAT CANNOT BE VIEWED AS YOUR SELF.
You can never analyze nothing because your self cannot be viewed as nothing.
Let have a more funny logic!
A table is not like me…nor would anyone sane mistake it for me… 
But what about a blind person? Or a blind person incapable of feeling(as in sense of touch)? lol… well they have different perception than the you or me.
and to the main point…
well i think the poster was refering to “What cannot be viewed as your self? Nothing” to the next set “What can be viewed as your self? Nothing.”
That is if you dont know what yourself is(like), then you dont know what yourself is not(like).
~maybe?
Our perception of ourselves and each other changes by the minute as an ever-evolving entity. I know you; I don’t really know you. I know myself and yet don’t know myself at all or what I am capable or have the potential of becoming.
I am in the likeness of everything which I have been changed by in any way, and also, it is in my likeness. The many of us are far too quantum-entangled to ever forget eachother, unless I have an indoctrinated amnesia, filtering out the many to save thyself.
I was born unworthy, and now, once comprehending and close, it may be too much for one body to handle…
The whole universe is like me, as we are an arrangement of electrons and such.
I suppose if I asked for the ocean to be dry, I’d be confused in the cage of my own expectations, also.
Ofcourse, as perception instantly becomes synthesis and exo-to-endo-memory. =D>
You both came out of the dirt and then went through many systems. 
“Sane” is pretty-much “fitting into the mental systems which are most commonly used.” I’m sure that stellamonika will explain himself more fully soon, as will you.
Unmanifested potential…
And… at a single thought it becomes existent in phase-space.
Also, depending upon what condition the present is in, the future will change, and this can reverse impose once you learn how to make it do so, thus altering the future can alter the passed which manifests as the present.
One of the most advanced forms of psionics: Time engineering.
I feel like I’m going to throw-up, ever so slightly… And during my dissatisfaction is when my enginuity rises, as suffering is the phoenix of success, and I now embrace discomfort.
Good night, ever-changing Us.
Why not?
There I go taking people literally again. No doubt there are convolutions afoot as to the proposed definition of ‘like’.
Zergling- even if a blind man without a sense of touch was to mistake me for a table I would still not be like a table. If this were the case I would be regularly mistaking my employees for hard working human beings in the hope that their output improved. 
"Zergling- even if a blind man without a sense of touch was to mistake me for a table I would still not be like a table. If this were the case I would be regularly mistaking my employees for hard working human beings in the hope that their output improved.
[/quote]
lol. I’m not saying that you’re not you from yourself’s pov but if you take what that blind person without the sense of touch’s POV, you’d still be you, just not the way you view yourself as but what that blind person views you as, a table.
Well, I guess even then, that blind person would not know what a table is because that person cannot tell the difference.
All you’ve done is made a statement and not supported it in any way.
So I say, yes you can. Yessiree, you can analyse whatever you want. Ladeedadeedadeeda.