Who put the bop in the bop shoowhop shoowop?

Would anyone care to care to discuss my irrational views?

I just lost a quarter of my readers right there.

How does the thing that has a thing that competes with that other thing with a thing on its own thing work, that’s the real question We’re not talking about santa claus here. We’re talking about cold hard facts. And the abstract stuff presidential speeches are made of. Lowest common denominator. Agreements based on agreements, that sort of jazz.

Okay, about another quarter of people have dismissed this post already.

Who wants to talk about how we hate the input but love the output. What great filters are we.

Okay, some people are staying.

Want to talk about eyeballs and computer programs.

Okay, now where getting somewhere.

Big old bam, you slim slim slamma.

Okay, now, I just lost everyone right there.

Hostile humor is fucking funny.

I’m serious.

Any posts that follows this that makes fun of me, everyone needs to rewrite the sentences they use, in order to make a better insult. A little editing, people, that’s all I ask.

Dont be scared of good edit

STATE something rational and we can have a debate.

?

erm… i like to build on something already started so you try stating something rational and ill comment on it…

[edit] I wrote something really witty then edited it out [/edit]

“How does the thing that has a thing that competes with that other thing with a thing on its own thing work”

Now let’s think about this carefully, shall we?

First we’ll consider the thing that has a thing. Let the first thing mentioned be A. Let the next thing mentioned be B. B is an element of A.

Now we’ll consider “that other thing” which A competes with. We’ll call this D. I will use “C” for “Compete” and therefore - Cad.

Now we’ll include that “that other thing” (D) has a “thing on its own thing.” I may as well consider the thing for D has to be E. E is an element of D. And finally E has a thing on it. So we may call this F, and F is an element of E.

So the root question is taking the previous formula: Cad, and asking how.

I’ll use “el” for the element symbol.

With C meaning “compete,”

how Cad? where (B el A) & (F el E el D) ?

I don’t know! I think we may require Seinfeldian analysis.


Edit: I’m sorry, I think I’ve already discluded some of the relevant information in my formula. F was not simply an element of E but actually was simply “on” E. So with C meaning “Compete” and O meaning “On.” Perhaps I should write . . .

How Cad? Where (B el A) & Ofe & (E el D)?

haha =D>