“Was” seeming to be the operative word here.
gecota
(gecota)
July 5, 2006, 4:59am
22
I had a problem with the quote button so,
My posts are in red
PhilosophyGirl’s posts are in green
and, Gobbo’s is in bold
PhilosophyGirl:
PG,
Watch this:
–Well I watched the entire series and I must say I don’t think it was as horrible as most say it is.
Who says this? Clarify.
I don’t have to. Where does it say that in the Reviews of Reality TV shows handbook?
You don’t have to, but it would be nice.
PhilosophyGirl:
–You probably have to be a fan of Spears I guess.
You probably guess you need to be a fan of one of the two main actors in order to enjoy the show? Yeah… that’s… yeah
Yes, to watch home movies of Spears sitting around eating string beans you might have to be the sort of person who would be fascinated by watching her-do anything. On the other hand, watching any celebrity be as mundane as the rest of us all in real life can be fascinating even if you aren’t a fan.
So, if you’re a fan of her’s, then you would watch the show, but those of us, like me, who are not automaticlly drawn to this show won’t care. The purpose of a review, or at least how I see it, should be to educate the none Spears fans on why the show is worth checking out.
All I really know is that the show isn’t as shitty as I might aspect. That a really good reason to watch it.
PhilosophyGirl:
–It really did give me a better understanding of her and Federline and personally it made me like her more and understand and appreciate her marriage to Federline as well.
Again, you’re supposed to be unbiased. In a review no one really cares so much about your opinion, rather than your sort of objective comments. Dealing ith the facts as best you can. There are no facts in this entire… couple sentences.
Reviews are opinions. Of course people care about my opinion, I watched it and they wanna know if its any good, that’s the point, are you high?
If it’s any good, that’s the reviewer’s job. If I wanted to find out if it was good or not, I would have already checked it out on my own. But, since I don’t care, it didn’t happen. I’m not curious enough to watch it just because you kind of liked it.
Also, why are you asking Gobbo if he’s high, that’s a rather unnessasary question.
But, I know nothing about it, and I never paid attention to it at all. What’s good about the show? Why can’t you tell us that?
PhilosophyGirl:
–It’s not a bad watch, especially if you are a fan.
That goes without saying.
Nothing goes without saying that’s a point of a review.
Of course it goes without saying, if your a fan of dog shit, it’s not a bad watch.
PhilosophyGirl:
Kiss my ass.
Wow, is that really nessasary?
if i may interject, we’re trying to discuss the quality of a review.
please post these kind of comments in one of our many “joke of the day” forums in the future.
PhilosophyGirl:
And yes those people would be interested to know that the show does bring you into a closer insight into who Britney is and why she married Kevin.
Give me an example of a telling moment from the series that enabled such insight.
This is not an essay or a synopsis, go get the DVD if I have riled up such curiosity…in other words, if I have written such a fantastic review.
I couldn’t really give a toss about the series, I’m trying to teach you a few things for your own benefit.
If you were Britney, I would. Mainly so that I could tell the press that Britney has the most foul, pungent, fecund stench drifting around her rear end. She’s another celeb who could die and it would be her greatest contribution to the world. Like Elton John, or Boy George.
xanderman
(xanderman)
July 5, 2006, 8:43pm
26
PhilosophyGirl,
Please be watchful what you write.
i) No ad hominem arguments
…It helps no-one to start throwing insults around the place.
ilovephilosophy.com/phpbb/vi … p?t=139918