God created cieling cat to watch you masterbate and record every detail of it in the book of sins. He also records it on video.
God then sends the erotica video and book content to satan in hell.
Satan sells copies of it to people in order to extort money, but serve’s God’s great purpose of emberassing you.
Why?
God created your dick for the soul purpose of creating something to hate.
He told you to cut the end off of it. Shwing.
God hates dicks & sex, that is why he created the both of them.
God gave you the intrinsic desire for sex because your free will needed to be tested and you needed to resist your will so that it can be more free and shit like that.
God has a big sword he will use to poke out your eyes and cut off your balls if you do not listen to him and read his bible book ALL of the time. AAALLL THE TIIMMEE.
Note:
Do not put this into mundane babble, you evil moderat0rs!
I’m making a valid point here.
Exactly.
And sex processes are especially bad because you ‘lose control’ and religions - at least those big non-pagan ones, have, sadly, focused on control.
More importantly, the Judeo-Christian God developed in a pastoral situation, where population is a major problem. Specifically, too small of a population, because if you don’t reproduce enough the herders next door will and they’ll have enough people to beat you damn good. So you attach a huge stigma to non-reproductive actions like masturbation and menstrual sex. Given that land is limited in that context, legitimate birth is also emphasized.
There are no burning bushes. No cabals of sadists out there to prevent you from feeling good. Just tactics that work and tactics that don’t. How they fair in any given strategy is a whole 'nother ball game, as they say . . .
Actually there have been throughout history cabals of sadists out there to prevent people from feeling good. There are people who resent the seeking of pleasure, who worship control, are afraid of strong emotions and passion and some of these people have even decided that other cultures needed to be changed to fit these priorities. The same force that aimed this mentality at pagans and heathens and indigenous peoples also aims this mentality at their own populations, especially focusing on children. Violence has been generally considered appropriate ‘training’.
The fact that modern humanists can imagine certain practical reasons why these rules may have made some sense does not preclude the motivation being one of sadism.
Sure, name 'em. Show 'em. Present 'em. You’ll find they are not some ultimate evil but regular people operating through regular means. Little Eichmanns, if you will.
Now, sure, we can look at serial-killers and the like as exceptions, sure. But where have they controlled society? And don’t give me that social-contract-cum-white-man’s-burden crap.
The Inquisition was one rather broad approach to getting vestiges of paganism and non alignment with church authority and rules about sex in line. Neighbors whisper to the right church authority and small minds running the gossip mill and the religious hierachy collude to control the behavior of those not feeling sufficient guilt about sex or their own spiritual abilities.
Where do they not control society? It is often easier to see in relation to other cultures. Native Americans were separated as children from their tribes and parents, punished for using their own languages and force fed Christian values, including those around sex. Natives were seen and brutish barbarians in need of control. The same patterns are involved when outsiders to the culture enter as children who are treated very much like colonized ‘barbarians.’
The white man’s burden crap, which is crap, of course, precisely because it involves the kind of control based thinking and presumptions I am criticizing, and not something I am defending. This attitude is not limited to Europe, of course, and has parallels when other pompous cultures run around telling their neighbors, some rather distant, how they must run their lives.
Yes . . . because Catharism, what the Inquisition primarily opposed, was all about sexual liberation and feeling good. Oh, wait, no, they were radical Manichaeans and sought to renounce all things material, including feeling good. Especially sexual matters.
I’m not sure where you get your conception of history from . . . Pagans were not the concern of the Inquisition at all.
You think you are criticizing a sort of thinking while embracing it because you don’t have the background knowledge to discuss where and when oppression occurs. That is precisely the sort of mentality that those who embraced “White Man’s Burden” had, and your conception of the good is likewise flawed.
But dude, I’m a “masterbater.” I usually do it on weekend mornings. It’s better when no one’s around, but I’ve done it with people sitting next to me. I’m pretty good, in fact. I can feed a family doing this. Once, this couple stopped to watch me do my thing. Couple of tugs on my rod, and voila, you got dinner, baby. Here’s a trick: Pull hard on it when you feel that it’s close. Makes that thing shoot outta there like a fucking rocket.
Tried doing it on a boat? Awesome. It’s quiet and no one’s around to disturb you.
Sure, the church ALSO opposed people on theological difference grounds.
Incorrect. People who kept the old ways, especially women would attacked via the inquistion. The inquisition also attacked groups more liberal around sex. The inquisition was often used in the ways tax laws have been used against gangsters. It gave the powers that be a route to taking on herbalists, healers, unmarried sexually active people, independent women: people who kept up more pre-christian lifestyles. To me it sounds like you are buying the PR. You are also using one example of church behavior as if this was all the church did with the Inquisition.
Your reference to the white man’s burden makes no sense. And you are, for some reason, trying to show my posts critical of the white man’s burden philosophy are like the white man’s burden philosophy by saying that my example of the inquisition is not historically grounded. Rather than, for example, actually dealing with my criticism of the white man’s burden philosophy and the judgments of non-European cultures which were seen as over sexed, too passionate, too physical and in need of control. IOW groups of people with power trying to control other people, including their sexuality and bodies.
We could also look at the way homosexuals were and still are treated in a variety of countries that really do not have a baby production shortage, to show that ideas about how other people should restrain their sexuality are not based on practical concerns.
But every response of yours has been condescending, really for no reason at all. You could have discussed this at the very least pretending we might be equals. I can’t see a reason to read any more of your posts. Implicit and direct ad homs detract and I find that when I go on posting with someone who uses them it is a waste of time.
You are gonna need some sources to cite that. The primary target of the Inquisition was Christian heretics. That doesn’t mean it wasn’t nasty as hell, but you are warping history to suit an agenda. And that is precisely why comments like White Man’s Burden are pertinent.
It wasn’t a humanistic reason for the God-says-no ism.
The reason is God, not mankind.
God loves you, so he wants you to suffer, and he hates you. God will destroy almost everybody on earth someday, other than the members of my religion. Either eternal death, or hell, or something else like that, awaits anyone who doesn’t agree with my ideas. Even if my ideas are painful, disobediance is even more painful.
God is - angry dad. youtube.com/watch?v=Mj6xBhtELIQ
Angry dad hates his children/creations, because they’re little bastards that never do as their told. Death/punishment is the answer, because words don’t work.
God is a distant guy from a foreign country/reality/race,
and he is white,
and he tells you what the fuck to do, no questions asked.
The english race may have gotten their ideas from jews,
But so did the arabs and other shit.
Jews got their ideas from gods/God/demons/aliens, or some shit.
Either way, some powerful force decides how stupid we should act.
Evil has a divine backing otherwise it would not be able to exist in reality.
God is all-powerful so anyone who doesn’t do what he wants, can’t stand up to him.
Whenever somebody suffers, it’s because God’s revenge is happening.
Whenever someone feels happy, for any reason other than God’s intentions, it’s dangerous and possably bad.
