Beyond Good and Evil. Beyond Good and Evil. Beyond Good and Evil.
The “bad” comes first. Then, after time and habit, it develops into the “evil”.
The “bad” is necessary. The “evil” is not.
Beyond Good and Evil. Beyond Good and Evil. Beyond Good and Evil.
The “bad” comes first. Then, after time and habit, it develops into the “evil”.
The “bad” is necessary. The “evil” is not.
Luckily for you guys, my philosophy happens to entail that there is a grain of truth in every belief. Unfortunately, my unchecked, basic, reaction to this babbling is “What a load of shit”. Why? Because, though the things you have said may be meaningful, they are not meaningful in this particular context. While if they were in a different post, I may find them interesting, in this post my reaction is as stated above.
Rules of discourse:
Now, if I remember correctly, the topic was
“How is it worth the effort to understand the benefits of something?” i.e. Why do people try to understand how scaring wolves has benefits? Comon guys, it’s not metaphysics. If another few posts go by without meaning I will smite you all on the cheek.