There are three reasons why humanists are racist nazis.
They want to get rid of racial pride and heritage, they literally want to turn everyone into one race. They want to get rid of all thoroughbreds and force everyone to be one race, no different than Hitler wanted everyone to be one race, where everyone is equal and the same - fascism and marxism.
They believe humans are the only group. They say humans should all be “one”. Humanists do not care about animal rights or other species. They believe their race to be superior to all others. Humanists do not care about cow concentration camps, the only care about the human race - no different than Hitler.
Humanists are for a one world government. They like rules and regulations, like regulating free speech and preventing whatever they believe is inappropriate. Hitler wanted a one world government too, hitler believed his nazi paradise was a utopia, and humanists believe the same about their world. They are only one step removed from Hitler.
Force everyone to be one race? I have to get out more and see what the new policies are. Do they escort us to special rooms for mating? And what will I look like when I am a mulatto? I thought they could only influence future generations.
Well, some of them do. They tend to a little more than non-humanists, though less than some indigenous and pagans.
Hitler was a vegetarian. But he didn’t respect individual plants, this is true. Nor do the humanists, except a few. Muslims think animals should suffer minimally when they die. That was nice of them.
Some of them are. Most are not.
Pretty much all larger groups in the world love rules. I dislike many of the rules humanists got rid of.
Well, maybe two steps. Outlawing the word nigger and killing all the Jews one can find qualifies, technically I mean, as two steps.
I have the manual for determining steps. It clearly states that it is one step from words to humans, then a second step from banning to gassing to death someone after taking out their gold fillings.
So two steps, but you were close. I mean, one, two steps, its a quibble. A silver is a still a medal, be proud.
I wonder if anything you say demonstrates your conclusion.
Racist: a person who believes that a particular race is superior to another, hence the opposite of someone that wants to get rid of racial pride. If they want to get rid of racial pride, then, by definition, they cannot be racist. Nazis were the enemies of Marxists, so it makes sense if what you were accusing humanists was of being raceless Marxists, but does not make sense if you accuse them of being racist Nazis.
If they believe that humans are a group then it makes no sense that they could also believe that humans “should” be one group. What “is” simply “is”. I believe that you use “race” and “species” without distinction. Racial groups are supposed to exist within the species, so there is a distinction that has to be kept. You state: “Humanists do not care about animal rights or other species.” This is correct; humans are considered a particular species among others within the animal family. But you add: “They believe their race to be superior to all others.” Other animals are not “races”, but “species”. Again, all I’m saying is that your statements seem confused and do not justify your statement, your conclusions about humanists. They might be what you say they are but your statements do not support that conclusion.
Governments, period, are for a one-world-government, and the power-that-be, even those that tell you that they are “champions of freedom” want rules and regulation. Free speech is a form of control of the masses, a safety valve for the masses, the dispossessed to vent out atrocities against them rather than act against those who commit these atrocities. There is a big difference between Hitler and humanists. Hitler considered his government utopia for the Master Race, not for humanity as a whole because the racial difference had to be respected and thus, for some, Utopia was something that they would have had to suffer. Humanists, since they do not believe in race, according to you (which flies in the face of your accusation that they are “racists”), would have to believe in a vision of Utopia for everyone, since everyone was the same and none was the Master of another, so they are very far and away from Nazism.