You have a very unexposed mind… And actually I don’t have much energy to train someone who cannot even make a post about the difference between personal survival (continuity of consciousness ) and reproductive survival, and evolution and race distribution and species and even higher concepts than that - all of this posting of yours is incredibly absurd. Given that arbiter gave you the solution and you slammed him as a pos, it’s clear you are not remotely rational at this point.
That’s what YOU’RE implying by saying it is stupid and nihilistic for a white person not to care about preserving the purity of the white race (as if such purity ever existed). If there is no actual reason for me to care, then it’s just a sentiment you feel and i (as opposed to you) might as well care more about the survival of myself, my loved ones and my neighbors (who are probably about half black and 3 quarters minorities).
i don’t think there is any rational argument for your position. i think it’s an aesthetic and emotional preference you have (probably because you don’t know or interact with many black people). i’ll add then, that it is pretty disingenuous to call someone stupid and nihilistic because they don’t share your emotional reactions and aesthetic preferences regarding skin tone.
It wouldn’t necessarily, but usually two people with different outlooks who are both being rational can at least understand each others’ rationales even when they don’t share them.
i am not all white people, and all white people are not me. Therefore it is not self-destructive or self-hating if i fail to concern myself with the future of white people a century into the future.
My sense of identity does not hinge on the color of my skin. If it did, THAT would be an extraordinarily weak sense of identity - shallow indeed.
i’m doing just fine surviving and preserving myself without concerning myself with the survival and preservation of everyone who has the same skin tone as me.
After reading the OP, I was wondering how long before someone would tell you that you hate yourself and call you a nihilist and/or modernist. All on the first page, as expected. And not one rational argument yet, as you predicted.
All colors of the rainbow, each with unique and special talents. For instance, one group might be better at science, while another group might be better at sports.
Tell me again what is the rational argument for a position like this?
Why should I care about whites? Because I am white.
Why should I care about humanity? Because I am a human.
Why should I care about mammals? Because I am a mammal.
Why should I care about animals? Because I am an animal.
Why should I care about what exists? Because I exist.
Like I said, your ‘why should I care’ leads to nihilism because you can ask the same question about ANY of them.
If you negate race as being irrelevant, why not humanity too?
If you negate humanity as being irrelevant, why not being a mammal too?
If being a mammal is irrelevant, why isn’t it also irrelevant being an animal?
In fact, why should we treat what exists any differently than what doesn’t exist?
I am sick and tired of this exist-ism. Just because a unicorn doesn’t exist doesn’t mean I shouldn’t save a unicorn if I have a choice between saving an existent child and a non-existent unicorn. Non-existent things lives matter too.
If you admit that you do care about any one of this categories, the question arises, why not care about others too?
upf I never said a word about purity. Why is it always the same fucking strawmans with people like you. Just a couple of days ago some other clown put words in my mouth and accused me of speaking about purity, when I never mentioned anything like that.
However, the differences between whites and blacks are undeniable.
If you’re white and you generally prefer blacks over whites it means you suffer from self-hatred.
This is why so many black people suffer from self-hatred, especially black women compared to white women, because they, consciously or not, perceive whites as superior both intellectually and aesthetically. Do you know that the average number of black male on white female rapes in the USA is about 20,000 a year, and in 2003 there was not a SINGLE one, that’s right, not one, zero, 0 white male on black female rapes in a country of 300 million people. This speaks volumes on the differences between blacks and whites, don’t you think?
i am not all humans, and all humans are not me. Therefore it is not self…
See what I’m talking about?
Deny it all you want.
You’re a nihilist.
If only race was ONLY about skin color… if only. Then you liberals might have a point.
Too bad so sad that race is not only about skin color, and that it is also about genetically imposed potentials and limits regarding intelligence and behavior.
An imbecile would say he is an existence-ist, in that he identifies with everything that exists and dares not make any further distinctions
A slightly less retarded imbecile would say he is living being-ist, in that he identifies with all that lives, but dares not make any further distinctions cause it would be discriminating and evil and would make him a nazi
etc. etc.
until we come to a humanist, he identifies with all humans but dares not make any further distinctions
less of an imbecile than a humanist is a racist because the racist identifies also with his own race but may not dare make any further distinctions
See my point?
Being a racist compared to humanist is, actually, an indication of higher awareness because it means one perceives more.
Existencist is the biggest imbecile because he is frightened of making a distinction between living and non-living existing things. He is afraid to admit to himself what he is perceiving, and to act in accordance with those perceptions, thus also denying his own genetic inclinations because of memetic brainwashing. An imbecile and a coward.
See, we are all imbeciles and cowards… to a degree.
I think the best “ist” is a sentience-ist…someone who has compassion and relates to anyone or anything which is sentient.
Trouble is, we don’t have the technology to determine what is sentient, and what is not. For all we know our coworkers and acquaintances could be pzombies.
Nothin wrong with it if she doesn’t look like a baboon. Tbh my ex-girlfriend was black, we never banged because she lived 5000 miles away. You said yourself that black women are more masculine. Maybe they are tired of petite white girls and they want a strong independent black woman.
On the other hand, maybe they are looking for some ghetto black girl who is more ignorant than them, so they can feel superior in bed.
When I was in the civil service, I was talking to two colleagues one day (one chubby mixed-race: white/Caribbean, one black: she did look like a big fat ugly baboon) and we were talking about men and dating and they declared that they would never date a white guy, so after I pushed the matter some more they said they would date Eminem or Justin Timberlake… just as a white guy would declare that he doesn’t ‘do’ black women but he’d happily date a Beyonce, a Rhianna, or any other black chick in the public eye.