.
Neither cutesy nor funny.. ew, no.. perish the thought..
.
How is this post hidden..
.
..but not this
.
Moderation be like . .
..or, @Carleas uses this site for his ‘legal cases’ testing-ground.
.
Neither cutesy nor funny.. ew, no.. perish the thought..
.
How is this post hidden..
..but not this
Moderation be like . .
..or, @Carleas uses this site for his ‘legal cases’ testing-ground.
humanize also said something about jerking off on one’s own time. are you, satyr, and humanize the same person, and does that mean you’re also Pezer & RealUn?
There are two differences between those posts.
The first is that someone flagged RealUn’s post and no one flagged Ecmandu’s. That kind of feedback is important.
It also prompts a moderator to look at the post differently, because we’re mostly here to discuss philosophy and not to play cop. Reading to analyse an argument is different from reading to apply the rules.
And that’s the other relevant difference between the posts: Ecmandu’s post, crass as it is, is clearly attempting to make an argument. RealUn is making a joke. It seems right that there should be more leeway to make arguments that involve sexuality than to make jokes that involve sexuality.
Could Ecmandu have made his point without the words “suck 100 dicks”? Probably (although in a context of a conversation about Ecmandu’s mental state his choice of how to express himself is quite probative). But his point would still be about sex and the specific sex acts that men and women perform.
I know you’re put off by Ecmandu’s preoccupations, and you should flag posts where you think they cross the line. But no topic is off limits – and I will add that one of your posts was also flagged for being too overtly sexual, and that flag was also rejected on review.
I would again strongly encourage you to add Ecmandu to your list of ignored users (which you can do here) and stop engaging with him.
I don’t have a problem with Ecmandu… as long as he drops his Boot Camp idea.
So you only act on reported posts?
Many of the posts I report go ignored, and you want me to continue reporting posts?
.
In his previous threads he advocates/condones/calls for, the rape of minors and the buggering of young males, so paedophilia.. how did you miss that?
.
Bro, go mug-off someone else! Been there, done that.. you did f all.
.
..so condoning rape and/or paedophilia isn’t either? ..that has always been off limits.
.
…it’s not in my notifications column, so are you sure about that?
You moved one of my threads for sarcasm.. <— tell me you’re biased, without telling me that you’re biased.
Many of your complaints go ignored as well, but here we are.
Because I don’t read much of what he posts and no one flagged it.
Sorry, you’re right, it was not flagged, they messaged me to complain.
And though I think I looked at the post at the time, there was no link in their message, and looking now I can’t find anything you posted matching the description (something about a vibrator).
If it was a false allegation, I apologize for mentioning it.
I’ve been flagging his ‘off-limit’ posts for the last few years, of which @Flannel_Jesus made a mockery of them and of me, chastising me instead of moderating him and his wannabe girlfriend.
.
I had posted that ‘seeing that she kept extolling the virtues of AI, so loving it off long time, I presume that she owns a vibrator’ - hardly overtly sexual at all, compared to the sexually-graphic scenarios she was trying to embroil me in/hard-trolling me with.
.
The boards aren’t being flooded with his word-porn, so cool.. it would be great if this was a permanent thing.