Why We are so Great

How do you define ‘a life’ when every atom in your body changes, your memories are inaccurate, and your personality transforms dramatically from time to time throughout your lifetime? What even is ‘a lifetime’? Are you that same creature that your mother pushed out on the day you were born, or are you completely different?

Perhaps, it is the absence of death which defines a single life. Perhaps, it is the gradual overlapping of substances through space and time around a single point. But perhaps you have died before and merely forgot, as though it were an insignificant dream. Perhaps the entire world ceased to exist for just a moment, or perhaps for a hundred years, but then reappeared all at once exactly as it was. And what is a world anyway?

Do you live in different worlds at different points in your life? Or in different lives? We think of our world as a single thing, but is your world not completely different living in one place than it is living in another, or from one state of consciousness to the next? Is there a path that leads from world to world? Is there a way back again?

Some questions, once asked, will change what you are, who you are. Every philosopher ought to know this. Some ideas, however simple, once thought about will change your being altogether, permanently shift your perspective. Some things, once understood, carry grave personal responsibilities with them. I will not disclose these things here, but instead mention them only to spark the temperaments of those among you with the disposition to engage with futile labors.

I warn all young philosophers and prospective philosophers: The search into your universe, into possibility, and into yourself all end in the same place. Discovering the wisdom that one seeks inevitably reveals to oneself how little one can ever know. Certainty is the first thing you will lose, for it is an impossibility. Next goes one’s naïve innocence—oh what a comfort that was to have. Then you will begin to see the world for what it truly is, and all of its inhabitants too, and the trivial indifference that each has for the other and for itself.

Who else sees the quest for what it is? Who else knows the question to be of more significance than its answer? Who else so disbelieving, so determined to impact the nature of all? This is us! This is who we are: Lovers of wisdom, students of knowledge, bearers of the cross that is the examined life.

We live many lives, change static worlds, question unquestionable truths. We value. We refuse to accept authorities who cannot give us reasons to conclude upon. We were the first; we shall be last. We have given the most; we have taken the least. We had foresight that surpassed the wildest dreams of those around us as we discovered realities, opposed and disbelieved until long after we were gone. And it all came from our intuition.

We do not choose to be who we are, or to do what we do; only who we are not and what we do not. We did not ask to become great, but only wise. We, thrown into the world, were those who had understanding. We treasure greater things: Not wealth, not power, nor even fame. What we seek is a mere glimpse of the bigger picture. We do not covet valuable trinkets, but value itself. We want not to know the meaning, but rather what it is to mean at all.

So I warn you, happy fools of the uninitiated, be wary of what texts you put before your eyes. We have a lust for corrupting youth. There is no turning it off. It cannot be ignored, only avoided altogether. We are the great thinkers, but to such absurd irony, the tortured minds as well. And we know when you are full of shit. We invented that. Now hear what I say to you, it’s time to either wake up for good or go back to your dreamless sleep. Which is it?

To finish, I leave this thought which has infinite regress:

    How do you ever know 
    That the ‘you’ who you seem to be
Isn’t but a vivid memory
In the mind of the ‘real you’ as you’re about to die,
And your whole life flashes before your eyes?

Language deals in absolutes.

You are thinking in absolutes.

Reality, on the other hand, is mutability.

How do you define a rope, when not a single strand runs through it? We breathe in, breathe out. We become the world around us, the world around us becomes us, absorbing and shedding as we go.

Nice post.

It is doubt, particularly self-doubt, that gives the impression that one always “end[s] in the same place” of realising “how little one can ever know”. If we think we know something, we find we can reasonably doubt it all over again.

We are so ‘great’ because we continually doubt - because we can. And want to! Since the enlightenment, reason stepped up to a new eminence. Descartes and others carried on with what Socrates had started to popularise, establishing reason as the new arbiter of truth. With reason reaching out to all possible extents, it opened up possibilities that all decisive choices have to shut out in order to establish themselves and manifest at all. Reason opens up doors to all the flaws in every choice. One who cannot find a way to live according to certain pre-ordained choices, who has explored reason adequately, can dash it with sound enlightenment reason that now has the authority to be respected.

After many generations of lifetimes exploring reason, and well recorded exploits in doing so, reason needs to go further and further every time it is called for. The extent that we now need is practically damaging, the extent of doubt that is needed to understand and refute so many refutations and new understandings has become huge - and one who is now still able to get to the bottom of things needs to develop a practically obsessive mindset. Perhaps this is the danger to which the OP refers?

As to whether this makes us ‘great’ or not is disputable - doubtful! There is no surprise here, obviously. The potential damage that the necessary mindset can cause probably far outnumbers cases where years of repeated doubt has managed to pull itself back into practice and back out of doubt finally once again. Knowing this is not nearly enough to stop this - for why would one want to? How could one?

The question of whether we are the same person as we were earlier in our lives implies that we have an identity at all. We as people can not be contained in a particular part of the brain. The sum of the parts of the brain are necessary for there to be consciousness. It seems that consciousness must therefore be immaterial. For all of the parts of the brain can not be taken as pieces of consciousness. That is it is not possible to represent some sort of thought. Say the thought that there is a tree in front of me without making use of the necessary brain cells. There is not a certain brain cell that is a particular part of the tree and other brain cells that make up other parts of the image. In other words that individual cells within the brain are not qualitatively equivalent to the sum of the brain cells which produce a particular consciousness. Pieces of consciousness are not in certain parts of the brain. There are not pieces of the understanding that 2+2=4 in the brain. The idea does not make sense in pieces. Essence of 2+2=4 can only be understood as the composite of the numbers which make sense. Sure there is the understanding of the individual numbers and of equality. Such concepts in themselves require a massive number of brain cells to be present as ideas. Since ideas can not be pin pointed to a particular location within the brain it seems as though they must be immaterial.

how do I define a life? merely as the short period of time during which we (conscious beings) inhabit our present body. Think about it. we are not our bodies, or a product of our bodies. when does dull matter think and become self -aware? our defining quality is consciousness, and this is something subtle. Although our body, thoughts, and emotions constantly change, we remain the same individual. we are unchanging, and when the body grows weak and stops working, we inhabit a new body like someone changing clothes. We are eternal, constantly seeking love and fulfillment. This is our greatness.

I was watching I’m Not There the other day, and I suppose the question I asked about what constitutes a life is extremely well put therein as ‘the many lives of Bob Dylan.’ The most interesting being the Billy the Kid ‘life’. If I understand the movie correctly, it is the coherent underpinning of all the other ‘lives’. It’s like Dylan’s inner self, depicted in a surrealist context, and at the same time it represents the true reality of things which lies hidden behind that which appears real materially. I might be completely misinterpreting this however; I’m not much of a movie critic.

On another note, much of my original post was meant to be more of a brazen rant rather than a well argued philosophical discourse. I did not even supply argumentation for most of it. It’s meant to be somewhat silly, but mixed in with seriousness arbitrarily. Don’t take it too seriously.

Lastly, in case it’s not obvious to everyone, the title is a (rather bad) pun poking fun at Nietzsche.