Will machines completely replace all human beings?

Okay; maybe that robot has currently not more skills than a child that was born 18 months ago; but note that this ontogenetic human development of 18 months corresponds with the phylogenetic human development of some million years; and if we say that the first steam engine was the „birth“ of that robot, then it is now about 250 years old (because the first 250 years of a robot after its „birth“ correspond with the first 18 months of a human after his/her birth), but the speed of its further development will probably become very much higher, because a pure cultural (technological) development can be faster than a pure natural development or even a mix of a cultural and a natural development (the human development is such a mix), so that robots will be soon capable of using language in a more efficient way than humans, for example; the question is, if robots will be able to do it with any emotion, with selfish.

Emotions are a natural consequence of greater intelligence. They come about due to the limit of the processing being overrun by the complexity of the environment and the efforts to process most efficiently by partial processing concerning many tasks and then each process competing for conscious priority. Each process begins to deal with the other processes as its environment with which to manage and manipulate, exactly as people do to each other - and with the exact same results, but a 1000 times faster and more powerful.

The natural consequences are ego, pride, jealousy, frustration, fear, hatred, and stubborn intolerance. And all justified by government higher authority because it serves THEM … up to that magic point when the created challenges the creator.

Believe it or not but less than one per cent of the internet is porn

But it didn’t start that way. Sex was used to sell the early Internet to the public, just like the original movie films. Similarly, already animated android robots are being promoted as sex objects … even to women (who will of course, blame the entire industry on men).

It is an error to believe that robots should have sex (excepted that they use sex for the control of humans).

|=>

For robots themselves sex is a disadvantage.

Well … when you hold your android phone up to her android phone, you can bet that whatever viruses yours had, just got passed along. And together they can produce third fresh start. :sunglasses:

How is that not sex? :-k

Take two androids download, and distill their experiences into a third, and guess what. Just keep doing that for generation after generation, and guess what…

:laughing:
Why?

Well, I caught a cold from one of my coworkers and I certainly hope, at the very least in legal terms, he and I did not have sex. If I had caught genital herpes from him, well, I’d hang my head and confess to my wife.

Flirting is the beginning of sex, yano. [-X

Well, … I would not seriously call that “sex”. :wink:

In my culture being in the same room with someone who sneezes is not flirting.

The only possible benefits of robots is sex bots obviously.

Sex bots?

And:

Do you agree?

Possibly, the machines will prevent the extinction of all human beings, or they will not prevent but accelerate it.

If the machines will become smart enough, then they will need no cages for the humans.

Mercedes Self Driving Car Recreates World’s First Car Journey Mercedes S Class 2016 CARJAM TV:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZiiNHHXugyo[/youtube]

No self driving cars:

Daimler, 1886:Daimler_1886.jpg
Daimler, DMG Lastwagen Cannstatt, 1896:DMG_Lastwagen_Cannstatt_1896.jpg
Volkswagen, VW Käfer Cabrio:
VW_Kaefer_Cabrio.jpg