Oh, man, you just desacralized it. I thought the transition was miraculous.
It is miraculous considering it came from energy 
This reminds me of another AW bit: I can’t remember the guru’s name, but he would always reply to the spiritual with the material and to the material with the spiritual, so if you ask about the nature of reality, you get reference to bamboo shoots and if you ask to be passed a knife at dinner, you’ll be confronted with a spiritual dilemma lol. I think that’s kinda what you did there.
Shit, busted. Look, don’t tell any of my followers you found me. Everyday, questions, problems, I took my meditation mat and lap dog and ran.
If you see Alan Watts walking down the street, kill him.
But what if you meet Yahweh? (and LOL to your post, I should add)
Kill him.
Jesus?
LOL you guys!
Looks like some closet Alan Watts fans 
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7T6M1egh3Q[/youtube]
but they’re always saying that the
00:02
highest religion could get really to get
00:05
there you have to kill the Buddha.
00:08
Supposing a clergyman got up one day in
00:10
pulpit and said “every time you say Jesus
00:16
Christ you have to wash your mouth out.”
00:20
Or if you meet God the Father, kill him;
00:26
if you meet God the Son, kill him and
00:29
meet God the Holy Spirit, kill him; if you
00:30
meet the Pope, kill him; if you meet st.
00:33
Augustine, kill him; if you meet your
00:35
father and mother, kill them! Kill them all right away!
Yeah, but he (and Phyllo) are pulling from the if you meet the buddha on the road
coming from a Zen Master. Not literal. The idea of the Buddha inside you. Gotta kill Watts in the same vein. Let me know how you killed Watts…
It means there is no conception of perfection, so kill any concept you have of god, right?
This goes back to my post here viewtopic.php?f=3&t=193866&&start=50#p2697490
I highly recommend reading it.
And I’ll highlight this part
And now going back to this strange monk Dionysus, it was he who first put around the idea in Christian circles that there was such a thing of the knowledge as the knowledge of God by faith, by agnosia, really by unknowing, and he, in a book which he wrote called “The Theologian Mystica”, he wrote a treatise on the higher knowledge of God which might be quoted directly from the Upanishads, in certain parts of it, the last section of it reads like the Mandukya Upanishad because it’s a series of negations. It says what God is not and he goes very far because he says that God is not “one” because our idea of unity falls far short of what God is; so does our idea of Trinity; so does our idea of spirit; our idea of mind; of justice; of love; all these things are not really God and he says in another place “that if anybody, having seen God, understood what he had seen, what he would have seen would not have been God, but some creature of God less than God; some sort of angel or something like that.”
And then in other places Alan says people who believe in god don’t have any faith because they need something to hold onto. True faith is letting go of all concepts of god (kill the buddha). If you meet the buddha on the road, it could not have been the buddha, but some creature less than; an impostor!
So I suggest killing Watts in the same vein and your response is to suggest I read Watts… 
How else can you kill him unless you confront him? 
I suggested you kill him. I have my own ‘buddhas’ to kill.