you have no idea what truth is

[ladyjane]

When you say something is true
you have no idea what you are talking about
thus supporting colin leslie dean view that all ends in meaninglessness
take your pick of what true means

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth

* 1 Nomenclature and etymology
* 2 The major theories of truth
      o 2.1 Substantive theories
            + 2.1.1 Correspondence theory
            + 2.1.2 Coherence theory
            + 2.1.3 Constructivist theory
            + 2.1.4 Consensus theory
            + 2.1.5 Pragmatic theory
      o 2.2 Minimalist (deflationary) theories
            + 2.2.1 Performative theory of truth
            + 2.2.2 Redundancy and related theories
* 3 Formal theories
      o 3.1 Truth in logic
      o 3.2 Truth in mathematics
      o 3.3 Semantic theory of truth
      o 3.4 Kripke's theory of truth
* 4 Notable philosophers' views
      o 4.1 Ancient philosophers
      o 4.2 Medieval philosophers
            + 4.2.1 Avicenna
            + 4.2.2 Aquinas
      o 4.3 Modern philosophers
            + 4.3.1 Kant
            + 4.3.2 Hegel
            + 4.3.3 Schopenhauer
            + 4.3.4 Kierkegaard
            + 4.3.5 Nietzsche
            + 4.3.6 Heidegger
            + 4.3.7 Whitehead
            + 4.3.8 Nishida
            + 4.3.9 Fromm
            + 4.3.10 Foucault
            + 4.3.11 Baudrillard
            + 4.3.12 Ratzinger
            + 4.3.13 Badiou
* 5 Types of truth
      o 5.1 Mythology
      o 5.2 Religious truth
      o 5.3 Scientific truth
* 6 Notes
* 7 References
* 8 See also
      o 8.1 Truth in logic
      o 8.2 Theories of truth
      o 8.3 Major theorists
* 9 External links

[Jayson]

Since you wish to cut-paste everywhere an pollute the forums with the same content.

You are incapable of understanding the concept of the abstract to look at the considered, therefore any discussion except for that which you directly have exact reference to is beyond your capacity.

Being as much, you are exactly constricted from high thought conversation that includes the potential for human comprehension in circumstances that are, at this time, beyond our tangible grasp.

In blunt form:
You have an extremely limited scope and, for whatever reason, you think that your limited scope is the scope of the human grasp on reality and meta-reality. And by extension have decided that all conversation that is beyond your limited scope is, “rubish”.

Fair enough. I will just go play with my salt.

[ladyjane]

Since you wish to cut-paste everywhere an pollute the forums with the same content.

hey just pointing you have no idea what truth is

[Unreasonable]

I have absolute knowledge of what truth is and I’m not going to tell you Colin Leslie Dean.

[ladyjane]

I have absolute knowledge of what truth is and I’m not going to tell you Colin Leslie Dean.

you dont know what truth is as you dont know what know is

hahaha

[Fent]

Then tell us, oh superior one, what is truth they don’t lead to a truth of some description.

[ladyjane]

Then tell us, oh superior one, what is truth they don’t lead to a truth of some description.

what is truth -i have no idea
but
any description of truth according to colin leslie dean ends in meaninglessness

hahaha

[Jayson]

@ladyjane

Since you wish to cut-paste everywhere an pollute the forums with the same content.

hey just pointing you have no idea what truth is

I am capable of understanding exactly what the concept of truth is and how to evaluate an addition to the category for truth based on it’s relation of importance to my relative reality.

It is best if you reserve short-sided judgment of others because simply stating a position of philosophy and who first said it does not make it an absolute.
You do need to show proper deductive and/or inferred logic as evidence of the philosophy; “Gibberish” is not a proper premise.

[Jayson]

@ladyjane

Then tell us, oh superior one, what is truth they don’t lead to a truth of some description.

what is truth -i have no idea
but
any description of truth according to colin leslie dean ends in meaninglessness

hahaha

I don’t think it’s funny, and I take your laughter at disrupting countless threads with a message that essentially reads, ‘you are all wasting your time as you know absolutely nothing and are all greatly mistaken and dumb’ as the deepest grounds of insulting.

Further, you are a disciple of Mr. Leslie, but you fail him horribly as you do not produce any evidence of his work, nor do you show any intelligent perspective to represent the school of thought with, but instead enjoy prancing around the forums in ridiculous disregard for any other person or thought by simply throwing out pat answer statements of Mr. Leslie’s compressed thought.

It would be as if I wandered around stating that it was all useless as only God knows the answers and we are not Gods, therefore the thought’s we have are pointless, but salvation is at hand; embrace God and one day you will find the answer from God himself.

[ladyjane]

Further, you are a disciple of Mr. Leslie, but you fail him horribly as you do not produce any evidence of his work

you can download his works free from here
gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/ga … alogue.htm

[Jayson]

What I mean is that when you argue or take a position, you do not use his work in your position.

[ladyjane]

What I mean is that when you argue or take a position, you do not use his work in your position.

but i do
ie every product of human thought ends in meaninglessness

[Kriswest]

If you believe that the end product of every human thought is meaningless, Then everything you say is meaningless and utterly worthless and so not worth anyone’s time to pay attention to. You got it toots, You are here by pushed to the trash heap of meaningless worthless thoughts.

[ladyjane]

If you believe thatthe end product of every human thought is meaningless, Then everything you say is meaningless and utterly worthless and so not worth anyone’s time to pay attention to. You got it toots, You are here by pushed to the trash heap of meaningless worthless thoughts.

i agree
but
that applies to everyone else
hahaha

[Impenitent]

enough

-Imp