I am not a scientist or a philosopher. I read a statement some years ago. The statement is : variant is the order of invariants. Till date I am not able to get the meaning of this statement.
I like to hear a satisfactory explanation from the members of this forum.
Thank you.
Anisha
It depends in which context it is being used, but I’ll try and answer according the definition of variants and invariants.
Variant:= A variable quantity that is random.
Ergo invariant:= A quantity that is not random (or is constant).
Hence the statement then reads, “Variable quantities that are random are the order of quantities which are constant”. (I.e. randomness is a form of order, or randomness is a form of consistency) I would rather put it this way though: Randomness is a form of order. Not that I’m an expert on this phrase, but that’s what the definition of the words seem to imply. I could be wrong though. I wouldn’t stake my life on it that’s all.
Well… you may not be a scientist, but if you’re here with the desire to understand a statement like that - you’re at least philosophizing
If the statement - ‘variant is the order of invariants’ is true, then the advent of invariantology is inevitable!
=D>
If the statement - ‘variant is the order of invariants’ is true, then the advent of invariantology is inevitable!
=D>
This statement is the summary of all human experience! - the summary of all philosophies, sciences and religions!!
s.s