I have tried to explain my position in my thread called “The Ethics of Sex”. But that thread is six pages long. I will quote excerpts from the things I said there here.
“Sex is coitus. When sex is not coitus the mind is deceiving the body or even itself.”
Some have pointed out the contradiction within this sentence. What I meant is, when something other than coitus is thought of as “sex”.
“The sexual drive is the will to insemination.”
I will amend this statement later.
“Sex feels good because the body affirms its own propagation. And, as I said, the mind can deceive the body and even itself: it is pleasurable even to imagine insemination.”
“Saying the obvious is not redundant in a world where “everyone” is deceiving themselves. The typical 20-ish female student wants sex, but not pregnancy. Just imagine everywhere you hear the word “sex” today it would be replaced by “mating” (e.g., “to have sex” would become “to mate”).”
“I will change the title of this thread to “The Ethics of Sex”. I am appealing to the virtue of Honesty. This is what ties Nietzsche’s ethics of art, his ethics of religion, of knowing, of creativity, and of history.”
This is why I called my thread “The Ethics of Sex”. What is “unethical” here is to deceive oneself - mendaciousness.
"Philosophy, for me, is love of knowledge (“wisdom” in the archaic sense), and knowledge can only be knowledge of the truth. Whether there is a truth about reality can be disputed; that there is a truth to the world can, in my eyes, not. The truth is that in “the world”, i.e., the contemporary Western world, sex is generally understood as an end rather than a means - a pleasant end with possibly unpleasant consequences, like STDs, and pregnancy…
“What raises the philosopher above the masses is his truthfulness, or, perhaps a preferable word, his honesty. Honesty, cognate with “honour” as a word, is also integral with honour as a quality. So the ethics of sex are intricately tied to the very discipline of philosophy. Honesty about sex, towards oneself first and foremost, is therefore a touchstone of philosophy - honesty in the face of reality, to use your word.”
“The sexual drive is the will to impregnation through natural insemination.”
“We know this. And yet we deceive our bodies by masturbating, especially in combination with fantasising or consuming pornographic material, or by using contraceptives or having non-coital sex. Thus we deceive ourselves, but this is not the worst kind of self-deception. The worst kind of self-deception lies in believing in (id est, holding dear to) the idea that sex is not (only) a means, but (also) an end in itself. The development of a means to an end in itself is no elevation, but degeneration. For what happens to sex from which the goal has been severed? We play the game for the game’s own sake - for the sheer fun of playing. We still shoot, but not necessarily at the goal; and when we shoot at the goal, even into it, there is always a rubber barrier ensuring us the goal does not count. How long does such a game stay fresh? The missionary position, anyone? Who wants to have plain old-fashioned sex when the true, deep satisfaction of “scoring” has been removed from the act? One has to invent ways of keeping it interesting - all the sexual perversions belong here. Maybe if I tie a rope around my penis sex will feel fresh again - for awhile. I don’t have to go into more graphic details. The only way sex will stay fresh without being perverted is by keeping it firmly connected to its natural end. Sex shall be hetero, vaginal, and unprotected. And even sexual fantasy shall be about this form of sex. Such sexual fantasy is the creation of an image of a partner with whom one would want to have children. And when looking for a sexual partner, one should keep that image in mind. Sex with a partner with whom one would mind to have children shall be self-denial.”