I am not sure if this should be posted here or in philosophy? Social science began as knowledge of the gods and humans. Greek mythology is the language of civilization ruled by reason.
I want to point out this is a very Zeus archetype statement…
Zeus is the father of Athena and she would not have power as a goddess if it were not for her father. Athena is strongly in favor of male dominance, because Zues was powerful and could keep things in order. However, Zeus wasn’t sure why his father had created humans, and he really didn’t have much use for them. He forbid that man be given the technology of fire, because he feared with it, man would develop all other technologies and the rivil the gods. Which is indeed what has happened. Like, we have to admire Zeus, because he did have a good head on his shoulders, but…
I can’t help but think of the thread asking about female philosophers and the post explaining they are incapable of abstract thinking, but are good care givers.
Athena, took to caring about human beings, and she taught humans how to make their own laws. Athena, engaged with humans in away Zeus never would. Athena, often spoke with Zeus about humans, and he was very patient with her, because she was his favorite daughter, born from his head, after he had swallowed Athena’s mother. Think about that when thinking social sciences.
Now Athena does care, and she thinks it is important to listen to someone who is displeased, and process this displeasure with reason. While she may not risk offending Zeus, by saying his attitude is pretty thoughtless and it is not a good thing to disgrace people, and destroy their dignity with hurtful, shaming words, and telling them they are so wotrthless they will not be missed, we have had women’s liberation, and this Athena will take risk because she thinks it is pretty important to have awareness of what is happening here.
Is my point of view wrong, or is the Zeus statement damanging to our human relationships? What happens when we shame someone and make them feel unworthy and powerless? What kind of relationship has been established with the Zeus statement? I know I felt like shit when I read it. the attitude is, anyone who doesn’t please Zeus is worth shit. Oh great, that makes these forums an unsafe place to be if there is no reasoning with Zeus.
This might not be philosophy as men understand it, but has human consciousness been in trouble for lack of a strong female voice? Do we want a society where Zeus like people compete against each other and rule by power, or do we want a society the manifest these social rules…
-
We respect everyone, because we are respectful people. This is objective respect, where the object is to be respectful, not submissive respect, where we judge others and see them as above us, equal to us, or below us, and treat them accordingly.
-
We act with dignity and protect the dignity of others.
-
We do all things with integrity. This is beyond, don’t lie, cheat, or steal. It is right next to honorable. Our reputation as an honorable person is on the line, and this bleeds into Socrates explanation of justice, and Plato’s concept of a Republic.
This is social science because reason is the controlling force of the universe and we live in a cause and effect reality. We study social sciences to improve our society. Should Zeus rule without listening to Athena? What about him swallowing his wife because he feared she was going to have a child who would take his place? She was wisdom, and what happens to Zeus’s position in a democracy? What happens if we live by the rules for respect, dignity and integrity and what happens if we do not?
Thanks everyone- you helped me birth an idea I have been struggling with years- I just realized the metaphysics of democracy.