Ecmandu: PG,
You’re wrong.
Peacegirl: No you’re wrong.
Ecmandu: You have to exist in order to do something. That’s called a condition.
So we now know freewill is impossible.
In order to perceive the concept of choice, choice must actually exist. If it didn’t exist, it would be impossible to argue for or against it.
The solution is compatiblism.
Peacegirl: Free will and no free will ARE NOT COMPATIBLE! It’s a logical inconsistency!
Ecmandu: Those are two proof that nothing must exist in order for your argument to be true.
Since something always exists, your arguments are false.
Peacegirl: No one said choice doesn’t exist. But it’s not FREE choice. Your reasoning is as poor as iambiguous’s.
Ecmandu: And you can’t read.
But I’m anticipating your argument already.
Peacegirl: Stop projecting.
Ecmandu: People have no freewill because they always make the best choice they can make for themselves at the moment, and if they choose against it, they chose hell of their own volition.
Peacegirl: They can’t choose against it. You’re clueless.
Let’s agree on your argument before we actually discuss it.
Ecmandu: Remember though. I can go back and quote you in this thread.
Peacegirl: Be my guest.
Ecmandu: If you want to change your argument, feel free to do so.
Peacegirl: Ditto