Okay, laborious or not, take a towel from your bathroom and drop it on the floor. More in a heap than flat as a pancake. Describe the shape that results. Ask others to describe it as well. See how close you can come to the shape of the towel. At least make the attempt. Otherwise we’ll just have to take your word for it.
As for this numbingly ponderlous intellectual contraption…
…it can’t possibly be further removed from my own interest in the limitations of language. Back to Mary and Joe and the abortion. The actual abortion itself as a medical procedure can be encompassed in very precise language. Nothing at all like the towel heaped on the floor. The doctors go from step to step explaining specifically what must be done in order to accomplish the procedure successfully. And safely. At least for the pregnant woman.
Which is what you are attempting to do with respect to the morality of abortion. You insist that , “nobody is ‘forcing’ a woman to give birth anymore than we all forced her to have sex in the first place and become impregnated” as though the woman either chooses to give birth at any juncture from the point of conception or, what, be arrested for premeditated murder, tried and then, if convicted, sent to prison? Or, in some states here in America, to death row?
And what if she had not chosen to have sex but was, in fact, forced to. Or was raped. And what if giving birth could result in grave physical harm to herself?
There are countless individual contexts in which hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of variables can be different.
But, what, you’d take it upon yourself to encompass each situation with the precise language needed to describe it? And with the optimal or the only rational ethical prescription the woman is obligated to share?