Faust wrote:Which one would you put first?
Moreno wrote:Faust wrote:Which one would you put first?
I would say phenomenology is first.
If you are not already working with that and have some fluency with it, well...there is no hope.
My passion was almost overwhelming. If we'd been discussing occam's razor, I would have used a wild font, like comic sans.Faust wrote:Wow. Bold, italic and underline. That's pretty first.
And postmoderns consider utterly naive and culture determined, butMyself, i think it barely qualifies as philosophy at all. It's the kind of thing that moderns leave to science.
Lucis Trust wrote:You don't need extroverted experience to do philosophy, you can do philosophy with introverted inperience.
Besides, you don't need to experience well, you just need to wisdom well.
All these things you mention, are secondary philosophical characteristics, the meat and potatos is ethics.
But I don't wear one or I become obsessed with time.Lucis Trust wrote:I know you're watching moreno, i can feel your watch.
also, to boil down phenomenology to a single "it" and to talk about the job that "it" has done...come on, that's not reasonable. there are numerous approaches to phenomenology and you certainly aren't well-versed in them all.
Faust wrote:
Which one would you put first?
Faust wrote:LT and FJ each earn a warning. LT gets a month off. Most of the crap has been moved to Rant House.
Faust wrote: Ontology is the study of beings or their being — what is.
Epistemology is the study of knowledge — how we know.
Logic is the study of valid reasoning — how to reason.
Ethics is the study of right and wrong — how we should act.
Phenomenology is the study of our experience — how we experience.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users