James S Saint wrote:40% of the aircraft involved in USA Middle East conflicts are drones.
Tendency: 100% of the aircraft purely mechanical.
James S Saint wrote:40% of the aircraft involved in USA Middle East conflicts are drones.
Arminius wrote:James S Saint wrote:40% of the aircraft involved in USA Middle East conflicts are drones.
Tendency: 100% of the aircraft purely mechanical.
obe wrote:Drones do not use human pilots, therefore, less loss of life.
Arminius wrote:obe wrote:Drones do not use human pilots, therefore, less loss of life.
Arminius wrote:As I said:
More drones, more loss of live because more and more drones will be used and more frequently used, so more and more human beings will be killed by more and more drones, more frequently, and by more wars as consequences of that killing by drones.
James S Saint wrote:Arminius wrote:As I said:
More drones, more loss of live because more and more drones will be used and more frequently used, so more and more human beings will be killed by more and more drones, more frequently, and by more wars as consequences of that killing by drones.
Yes,.. until there are no more humans to kill.
The "last man standing" is an android.
Arminius wrote:Do you say with absolutely certainty that all human beings will be replaced by machines?
obe wrote:I propose than, James, that You switch over to the irresolute category. I am a firm believer in that even small probabilities can change the course of events. Against all odds, machines may be checked, from their march toward world human domination!
obe wrote:This thread in all seriousness started so well. Now i have a twist on the intent and outcome. I ask Arminus to post a 4th table with breakdowns, before the quality of the forum goes into self destruct.
.
obe wrote:Who is arguing? Placing hypothesis before conclusion is the usual standard way to go about the business of approximating the most probable course. Usually the two re-enforce each other.
Logical implication:
p = machines are cheaper than human beings.
q = machines replace human beings.
p --› q = machines are cheaper than human beings, thus machines replace human beings.
Lev Muishkin wrote:"Cheap quips about "black" people.
Arminius wrote:Lev Muishkin wrote:"Cheap quips about "black" people.
"Cheap quips about black people"? There is no cheap quip about black people in this thread. Stop insulting me!
O_H!
Arminius wrote:If one only looks for economical reasons for having children, then one will only find a ¼-solution.
There are 4 main reasons:
1.) biological reasons;
2.) cultural reasons;
3.) economical reasons;
4.) techn(olog)ical reasons.
The reason, why decadent people always think the reasons for having children are always and exclusively economical ones, is the fact that they themselves always think (decadently) the reason for having children would be always and exclusively economical ones.
=> #
Arminius wrote:Please search for another thread, if you do not like this one. .
Users browsing this forum: No registered users