Sorry to tale so much time.
The proof is sort of in the pudding, metaphysically because one can argue that the sub stance or the axiomatic consistamce of natural science evolved consistently, in corresponding , methodical function.
How so? The analysand of the substance developed the brain’s functional latency with conjunction of the ability to analyze that, of which it was constituted.
The philosophy of mind shows that the brain develops so as to enhance it’s functional utility to break down the substantial, physical constituant of which it consists and apprehend that analysand, which changes substantially the analysand, or material that becomes the object of analysis
The analysand or, the substance analized would become anathema. or even un-seen, ununderstoid, and left unanalyzed without the cognative evolution which is essential and substantially reductive a-posteriori. that series of trial and error tests that build up certainti from a-priori ‘inventions’ literally- as Peace girl caulks them
The substance literally appears in a different substantial mode in closer examination, and actually, the modus operans results in the test that analyzes the kind of substance as both prior, and suceedomg to various held and verefued reductions to certain levels of apprehension congruent with cognitive development.
The end result of cognitive development is able to assess the comstituciam of the substance as that of an energy field, inclouding it’self : the matter if which the brain composed.
That is basically the metaphysical proof of correspondence with those of the physical, and that s is why the proof is in the pudding
Death is only a change in preception of levels of that change , on a continuous flow of perceiving a differentially relating functional appearance if utilizyng themselves within changing contextual appearances.
It can never end, because there is mo death as how we under-stand it conventionally.
We do pass conventionally but who we are will always become, a consustance of energy fields which can, or can nit dissipate and change .
The fear if otherness. of fearing that we are part of that otherness, is fearful and can lead to agression. which is a denial of that othernesd and a projection toward fearing that projection from others.
I personally have not arrived to bu able to eliminate all doubtful fear , but at least i am beginning to understand the validity of it, without actually perceiving that.
I must actually see it to believe it.