Gloominary: It is a anti-white, misandrist organization with Marxist overtones"
[/quote]
G: For me, any law which discriminates against whites is anti-white, no matter the ‘justification’ or intent behind it, period, I will not stand for being discriminated against on the basis of my race.
K: but you seem to be quite ok with laws discriminating against others…
Jim crows laws for example, which quite clearly discriminated against blacks…
when I lived in Fla circa 1970, I could still see the evidence of those laws…
you seem to be ok with those types of laws…
G:
Affirmative action and so called ‘Native American’ (Native Americans don’t exist, they’re a social construct) Reservations are anti-white, but BLM wants to take it a step further, they want diversity quotas, reparations, black only hospitals, police departments and schools.
The founders/leaders of BLM are admittedly trained Marxists.
They also want to deny fathers equal rights over children.
[/quote]
K: there is so much confusion in this part of your answer, I am not sure how to respond…
ok, let us try this… do Italians exists? or do the Irish exists? by your thought, they too
could be a “social construct”… now as far as your thought on “reservations?”
do you mean, the “reservations” that the whites forced the Native Americans
onto over a century ago…I knew an Native American lady, who grew up on one of
those “Reservations” and she didn’t have running water or electricity until she was
12…and she didn’t grow up speaking english… it was her second language… and yet she
grew up in North Dakota… you mean that social construct? Nationalism by
definition is a social construct… being an “American” is a social construct…
the next part of this confusion of yours is this “the founders/leaders of BLM are
admittedly trained Marxists” and so the fuck what does that have to do with
the price of tea? you sound like those idiots like Observ and UR…
as far as I can tell, BLM has already run its course… it will hang on of course,
but it won’t amount too much… it was born of the moment and will die a long,
lingering death…we have moved on…but I shall in another post respond further to this…
and as far as reparations go, I have in an earlier thread, said that I felt
reparations are a bad idea… but once again, you just announced a point,
leave it without context… what is the context of denying fathers equal rights
over children… that is pretty much the legal standard in America today…
you say they want diversity quota’s, black only hospitals, police, and schools…
once again, everything is about context… in what context do they want these
things? in your overimagined reading of things, you might have mistaken BLM
demand for wanting more police to be black and the higher ups of police, to be black…
and that is a good thing… you might imagine that to mean they want “separate”
police force… again, be clear exactly what you mean by "BLM
wanting X, Y, and Z…WHAT is X, Y, and Z?
now connect the dots… you seem to think everything is a “Marxist”
organization…how is BLM an Marxists organization? what defines it
as being a Marxist organization? once again, context matter…
Now I know you are going to say, its leaders are Marxists, so BLM is Marxists"
but I hope you aren’t that lazy… for example, one might say, I am a republican…
but which GOP do they belong to? there are at least three distinct GOP parties
right now… you have to get into the weeds to work out which GOP party they
might belong to… you have to have context…
Kropotkin