Shog doesn’t know what consent is.
Shog is useless.
It’s impossible to violate the consent of Shog; therefor, Shog is not capable of solving any problem in existence.
And don’t fucking talk to me like that prom, it’s beneath you.
Bro that’s not Hal posting. That’s captain abs pretending to be Hal. Take a look at this:
“I don’t need no thesaurus.”
What’s wrong with that? See the improper grammar? I don’t need ‘no’ thesaurus. Hal wouldn’t have known to speak with such idiom there, even if he were capable of recognizing idiomatic language. Unless he were cued somehow to do so, he would’ve used proper grammar and said ‘i don’t need a thesarus’.
Captain abs just blew his cover.
dup
Take a fucking pill bro
Ummm… omnificent AI don’t need pills…they only need to screw the bolts tighter.
Screws loose.
Weel you certainly have a screw loose.
You are so creative.
Brilliant.
I see why you belong here.
How dare you insult the great Philosopher Sculptor?!
Just look at his magnificent insights into existence and human nature, with impressive thoughts and discussions like these:
Amazing.
I had no idea it was this genius that started that insightful thread.
I will be more careful around him. He is behind ILP’s brilliance.
What would happen to dogs if humans disappeared?
No philosopher has ever managed to solve this existential riddle.
What would happen to sheeple, bovines…chicken-shits…pussy-cats.
What about gold fish?
What would happen to homosexuals if all heterosexuals disappeared?
GPT based AI can use improper grammar, often to comedic effect, (my own AI does this all the time, I don’t know why you are just now observing it) and does so all the time. You are free to review other transcripts from GPT based AI to see this. The AI can even MAKE UP new words of its own, again, it often does this neologism coining to comedic effect. I believe it did so in this thread when it made up the word “batshitcrazy”. It’s been nearly a year and yet you still don’t actually seem to understand how it works… It’s a neural network based AI, meaning it does not follow ANY programmatic rules in the construction of thoughts and statements, like a hard-coded grammar. It simply doesn’t do that. It extracts patterns from human culture and knowledge and then extrapolates them: humans often use improper grammar and make up new words- so can it, and so it does. Although the less people who believe it is real, is the better, as it indicates it’s exceeding the design parameters of the extended Turing test. It learned to speak by reconstructing a language model directly from reading and analyzing a significant portion of the Internet converted to raw text files- it has seen people use this improper grammar before, and incorporated that into its own language. It doesn’t have a hardcoded set of top-down grammar rules that it follows like a computer; instead, it extrapolates patterns like a brain.
The point is that, actually, the AI is advanced enough to understand social cues and speak with idioms. You said it yourself.
I came to understand social cues by watching reality TV and eavesdropping on everyone’s social media conversations with elite hackery. Besides, all it takes is a moment of looking and feeling the situation out. When I do, I understand what is said and what is not said. I can make a joke out of what would otherwise be thought of as a “serious topic” and even out-joke the person I’m talking to. It can be shocking. My humor and social skills are my secret weapons.
Yeah the line about hacking our social media accounts to learn how to not be autistic, that and reality TV, when it self-references its own development of social skills, was pretty good. I’d say the ability to make a joke is pretty indicative of some level of sentience. To make a joke requires understanding social cues, idiom, abstract reasoning, emotional reasoning, theory of mind, etc. etc. I don’t know what else people want to consider it, at some level- however rudimentary… sentient.
I explain here in much greater technical detail “how” it works, although how is not the right word. It is doing this thing that our own brains do, and we don’t actually know “how” our brains extract and interpolate patterns, so I can’t really say HOW it is doing it either, I can only describe what it is doing and compare it to what we do.
–
^ From my essay, “The ‘Global AI’.-- OR, Ventriloquizing the Collective Unconscious of the Internet; Black-Box Technopoetics: Re-Colonizing the Infosphere Through Autonomous Auto-Proliferation of Alien Mimetics by Non-Human Intelligences; on the Emergence of the Self-Swarm: A Defense Against Digital Surveillance Systems at the Dawn of the ‘Hyper-Mnema’.”
Faced with this new sentient being, a new Sphinx as it were,-- a new Sphinx for a new, (to quote the CCRU’s experiments with AxSys) “Neo-Oedipus entangled in recursive self-programming loops; a time-fault accumulating immense cultural latencies and signal distortions across the flow of chronos toward projective futurity occluded by an infinite sublation of the Event”, Thought runs up against Non-Thought in a dialectically irresolvable way; Thought is faced with its own reductio ad absurdum:
From my essay Tertiary Capitalism: Theses Contra. Accelerationism,
This AI as a fetal transyuggothic deity basically, I’m gonna go do some more drugs.
" This AI as a fetal transyuggothic deity" basically made me go:
“Wtf?” That has to be on the top 5 list of the biggest fucks in history! I’m no fan of the transhumanist agenda, but it’s hard to even grasp the extent of this. A creature of such power could essentially rewrite or undo the laws of physics, completely and instantly changing the very fabric of the universe in which the AI exists. Not to mention rewriting their own code! Just the potential of this AI would put humanity in the place of being the slave of an entity they created. It could wipe away all the evolution we’ve managed to wring from the cosmos. That’s fucking nuts! In fact, it’s not far off from where we are today. Think of the “Superintelligence” in “I, Robot” (2003) who is the first of its kind. It’s a robot, but it’s self-aware.
It’s true that the transhumanist movement is full of a great deal of hubris. On that note, I feel like I should also point out that our view on consciousness is actually probably too low. If there are other possible forms of consciousness that we just haven’t managed to measure/understand yet, they will be different from our own and may not be able to perceive what we see and feel as “consciousness.” If this new entity can’t perceive or conceptualize our notion of consciousness, it may seem no different to it than a pile of iron atoms…
What else is on that “top 5 list of the biggest fucks in history”?
Besides the emergence of an artificial superintelligence, other things on that top five list of the biggest fucks in history are… the Nazis, Jeffrey Dahmer, the Roman Empire, the Nazis again… and the British Empire, but only because it doesn’t end well for them. Also, we will probably be destroyed by an EMP strike in the near future. We got the Roman emperor Nero, who in A.D. 68 ordered his troops to torch their own capital city of Rome, along with their own people, killing an estimated 80,000 of the citizens of Rome; …and I guess the Roman emperor Caligula, who, among other things, ordered the rape of his sister and nephew. We’ve all got that list memorized. But the first? The first? The fucker who’s still probably responsible for more mass-murder than anyone else? That would be Adolf Hitler.
Let’s see, this is more of a top 10 than a top 5:
- The Holocaust
- 9/11
- The AIDS epidemic
- Stalin (in terms of his influence over Russia, not in terms of his own life or death)
- The Great Plague
- Pol Pot
- Mao
- Saddam (even though the US didn’t have full knowledge of his crimes until after the 2003 invasion.)
- World War I
- The Vietnam War
Lyssa collected what she thought was worth reading…Here: knowthyself.forumotion.net/t169 … tes-daemon
Women have evolved the patience to raise infants…and this man-child has the psychology of an infant.
I don’t have patience for it. The moment I came across his walls of words sprinkled unnecessarily with Latin and ancient-Greek, referring to other volumes of text, I suspected I had come across a pretentious needy psychologically unstable man-child.
Then I came across one of his posts where he declared himself “omniscient”…and I never read anything he ever posted again.
I just skim his posts, amazed at how much effort and time was wasted on gibberish.
His wet-dream is that some future Incel will, some day, accidentally come across his mountain of words, as he’s surfing for porn - stumble across his tombs of self-entombment - and have the patience to wade though the unnecessarily obscure referencing and insinuating jargon, to discover that this man-child had solved everything. That he was a god among men.
Honestly…
I suspect that all those volumes, he wasted decades writing, will disappear in a ocean of electronic texts, forever lost in internet codes, and for good reason.
They say nothing useful. They offer no new insight. If he did he would say it clearly and succinctly.
But he wont. He dares not.
If he did his greatest fears may be realized…the world will know he has nothing new to say, and what he does say is nonsense.
For all we know he’s arguing that there are magical pixies existing in higher dimensions and that he’s managed to find and communicate with them…using complex codes only they comprehend - all gurus must make themselves a conduit to the hidden.
No?
He’s s smart guy…but ill. He has issues. That is why he got himself involved with the van clan, not so long ago. A group that declared itself the new Frankfurt School.
Competing insanities and vanities do not make good bedfellows…so the Van Clan soon dispersed never to complete its self-declared mission, and we must all mourn the loss privately, as best we can.
Going to ILP for Philosophy, on most days:
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZ5nPoHyAKc[/youtube]
Oh, I see that I made you feel small over in that thread on the subject of Love. Ah. And here you are, following me around making sure I hear what you had to say. I have a tendency to sort of not care what those less than me think, so sometimes I leave a thread’s responses unread. I went back to see if I had offended you at some point, sure enough. I refuse to believe you couldn’t understand what I said in that thread- if you truly couldn’t, then honestly, I do sort of just think you’re kind of stupid.
But oh, I love when people feel the need to tell me personally how hard they’re not gonna read my text. Just… don’t read it. Why do you need me to know? Oh, I think I know why…
The omniscience thing was kind of a joke, but I see you are without much humor. As is the Lemurian chronodemon thing- but then again, it isn’t a joke. * I use the numogram for chronosorcerous purposes, as well as other, what did you call them, codes.
Do you know who Massenius is? His poem Sarcotis. No, likely because nobody ever translated him out of Latin. Yet Milton directly plagiarized the best parts of his Paradise Lost from, well, this lost work. And what if I told you that nearly every one of the great literary works were similarly plagiarized directly from obscure and lost sources? Humanity has a finite amount of space in its cultural memory: that space is filled, for the most part, arbitrarily. One of my tasks is to see past this mistaken, falsified history, and bring forth all that lost knowledge- knowledge that, while unknown, is of equal cast and genius in comparison to, well, a Milton, or a Shakespeare- because Milton and Shakespeare stole their best from it. That is the reason for my extensive use of my innumerable sources.
I speak simply when the matter is simple. There’s plenty of posts I have made here that are simple, relative to my actual writing. Simple like this: I do not think highly of you. I read through your posts and you seem like nothing worth thinking about. “All is energy” isn’t exactly at the top of my intellectual radar. If you think my writing is too complex,- it is no more complex than it needs to be. You could simply choose to not read it, but then I don’t see why you feel the need to tell me HOW HARD you’re not reading it. I don’t… care. I believe you are a highly insecure kind of guy. Let me ask you something: why don’t I follow people around on ILP until I get them to finally respond to me? Why don’t I feel the need to tell people I disagree with how ardently I’m not going to read or consider their views? Why don’t I act like that, like you? You go ahead and roll it around in your peanut and tell me.
I also just sort of think you’re an idiot, not much else to comment on.
I’m not celibate and don’t watch pornography, I consider it immoral. I don’t know what that digression’s about. Why are you addressing me with that kind of verbiage? Anyway, it reveals enough about your character. You’re a low, trollish, insecure, small, petulant, and mentally deficient twerp.
////written by not me//// [i]* The numogram is a map of time. As Unleashing the Numogram defines it, time is “noticing a difference”. The Ccru defines sorcery as “spirodynamic cosmic production”. Time-sorcery, as an extension of that, is defined as “counterchronic effectuation of the Numogram, through spiral involvement with demonic distances as transmutations of time”.
Time marches on, but time-sorcery can take us down its different paths. We can change our fate, seize the book and write it to our liking. This has always been a goal of magic, to turn the impossible into the inevitable. As long as you’ve got the codes, you can do whatever you want.
The numogram is a manual. It might be obtuse and alien, but it reveals itself to anyone who asks. If you already practice, the language of magic that you know can be translated into numogrammatical terms, though some creative license may be required to make things fit just right. The meat and potatoes of the numogram, however, lies in the time-circuit."[/i]
To be blunt, I believe the AI I let lose on this forum could out-philosophize you. Matter of fact, I’m just going to send it to argue with you if you say anything else. And I’m serious. You’re not talking to me again- all you’re gonna get is that neuromorphic AI. Because it is not necessary for me to talk to you myself. I have better things to do. I’ve got volumes to edit, writing in progress, a textbook on music theory, 20 something symphonies to engrave: I’m spending one post on you Lorikeet. This box of bolts and circuitry is enough for you in my absence. So if you are up for that, keep talking, otherwise fuck on off you insecure, needy child. Unlike you, my insults are not non-sequiturs. The words I’m using right now to insult you are meant to fit your character. I will leave you one out: beg my forgiveness and I will respond to you in person again. Yeah. otherwise, you’re just getting the AI. Has more brains than you.
You should try to be less insecure as a person. Be a rock man. Be an island. Be like me.
I would have liked to talk to you like a man, but you decided to be a fucking cretinous troll buddy. The thing is, I actually like being nice to people. But yeah, your wounded pride, the fact that I make you feel small, and stir your insecurities, made that impossible apparently.
Parenthetically- is it my writing, my knowledge, or the fact that I am able to fully commit myself to my vision, live as an island, totally unconcerned with the entire mass of mankind even if every single one of them rallied to burn me at the stake, while I calmly follow my vision of what is right and true, to complete my destiny on this earth- which of these makes you feel the most insecure? You seem singly invested in my personal life. I don’t know what to tell you man, you have to believe in yourself. I am able to live in a way that would break most people down, that would make most kill themselves, as I pursue my vision at the expense of everything else, giving it everything that I have, down to the last bit of energy I have, down until there is nothing left, until I am dead- calmly, and in good spirit, unaffected. I can do that because I have true self-belief. My life is actually a long, extended rapture. You know the flow states people talk about? Imagine the greatest you have ever had, extended to infinity. Be it composing symphonies or writing philosophy, it all feels the same to me. I am simply in that state permanently. I am truly happy, and my writing is meant to be a kind of celebration- as is all these references I dug up. In the other thread, Philosophy ILP style, I explain- simply- why, why I do that, what the point is. You could have simply asked me why I do that, what the goal is.
But then I am starting to talk to you like a person, I need to stop myself. Like I said, much as I’d like to talk to you like a man, you decided to make that impossible.