meno’s simple explain:
The world as such, contrasted or not in line with the inclusive presence of up to date intelligents, asks the primal, pivotal question , echoed down through the myriad reps of history; is the world as is: as it is, (common nomenclature) meant to be, or , it is not, but designed in a way it should be, -even merely striving to be progressively better and more adapted to how it turned out before?
Discouraged because progressive development does not go up linearly, within a given epoch?
May be can’t deal, with It and resigns it’self to doubt and the days to himself : yeah see , cut it out it’s useless, see all the effort and power wasted through time to nourish and give example to the young? Who’se egos are not yet bristling with disappointing wounds, cut doubly crossed by fortune!
No. Evolution is both: a psychic rebellion against those who turn down the appearent laboratory which appears to give control over all the ingredients into it’s failing and flailing time-sensitive temporally bracketed creation- rather the ups and downs of such correlation between limited and infenitely variable experience , as signs of fallibility of a self constructed artifact, which bought the paradox of attributing failure upon a designer who did it, so as to reflect it back into it’s own intellect ?
And if so, why not these sense of impression not correlate with the other impression, that shows the progressive trend to have implicit goals, In It’s self, those that sunflower like turn toward the sun, the giver of the power which enables to will further not backward that , of whose nihilization can not nature exemplify, a negatively deconstructed process, using all the gained energy, to go against it’s source, to destroy as an avenging angel, and thus destroy the ideals that was constructed on?
Can or should negative pedestals be erected for clever sophistry for which even Socrates was poisoned?
A double edge has this silken promotions, but as it appears to signify a change for the better? the ideals by which it is undermined with negative intent is, regardless, a testament to solitary pain, and the avoidance of sacrifice for others rather than of others.