Was it not part of the secret black art of truly grand politics of revenge, of a farseeing, subterranean, slowly advancing, and premeditated revenge, that Israel must itself deny the real instrument of its revenge before all the world as a mortal enemy and nail it to the cross, so that ‘all the world,’ namely all the opponents of Israel, could unhesitatingly swallow just this bait? And could spiritual subtlety imagine any more dangerous bait than this? Anything to equal the enticing, intoxicating, overwhelming, and undermining power of that symbol of the ‘holy cross,’ that ghastly paradox of a ‘God on the cross,’ that mystery of an unimaginable ultimate cruelty and self-crucifixion of God for the salvation of man?
Friedrich Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morals / Ecce Homo
Now , is it feasable in light of the above, to accept this as part of a predetermined Natural ascendancy?
Or , can this bifulcrate ascendancy and descendancy, in a teeter totter result of process in which consciousness It’s self could not have ever begun separation from the Dream?
Is it in this sense that we become knowledgeable over but not under and beyond that difference ?
Are evil supposed to expurgate , thus, through the archaic demons and gods?
Can a dream turn into a nightmare from which no exit is possible?
But must return into it’s paradisical innoscence? Yes.
They do not know. Of what ?
Of something determined from pressures from within and without to be able to identify that which defines a people gifted toward occupying a homeland5, where the only derivitive has been suppression and slavery?
Where self identification has always been a measure of slavery, of apperant genetic weakness, inviting compensation.
Where sacrifice of being overcome by any measure of existential strife? Even at the cost of deception?
Especially when god has come from two venues, and has always demanded sacrifice, when compressed to define his being?
Did Christ understand this? And hope a kingdom of extrinsic being can over come his interiority ?
If he had , did it help a future internationalism, or work against it?
I am afraid the short term may not disclose that, if it is measured in a few years, but with singularity approaching within decades to be sure. It’s that we have become too impatient
It is because of the collusive nature of Chistianity as a means of survival against the verbatim structural credibility of a god immersed in Gnosticism, that either the new King had to be elevated, or a hero had to be sacrificed. This was a collision course between archaic credibility immersed in slavery of classless animonity, OR, a continuation of communal identity sacrifice.
So much for Nietzche’s short circuited semiology…