A philosophical psychology can go farther than a psychologycal philosophy to further touch on this subject.
The very neat realization of this fact can be proposed by a simple symlogisn.:
Evolutional transcendental objectivism , posits the potential energy that can be required to set conscious awareness in motion on primary levels of sensation, ignition and social organization.
In the beginning, the slope of advancing this qualifying assumption, but the further along this progresses on a seeming 180 ° incline, the more quantitative substantial backup requires to 'keep things {straight} ’
Middle periods puts things into a doubtful focus, at a point when that quantifying ’ substance’ gets to be apprehended at a critical point between the formal primary supposition, and it’s qualifying sub principles—coinciding with calculating shorter arcs on a presupposed circle.
During evolution , the conscious realization reaches a calculable apex at an acute period, both as the geometric measurement approaches the perpenducilar, or the absolute axiomatic contradiction.
At this decisive moment the so called objective enlightenement follows, of course not everybody happy, and a romantic reaction develops, leading eventually to the modern onslought that we find ourselves today.
But what does all this have to do with afterlife, or reincarnation, as some prefer to call it?
Well everything, one may say, and this is why:
Let’ s start in the extreme uncertainty we find our self living in, ar the present time. Matter has been reduced to the uncertainty with the matter/ energy comondrum, vis, the cat in the box graphic illustration of uncertainty. Without getting tangled up in that, let’s incorporate the primal initial premise and the it to the secondary one, desiring a connectionbetween the two.
The sub Thetic infinitely reducible arc of the circle or ring, present just such a transcendental object, and as matter is further and further reduced into snakier and smaller bits of energy, the original evolution of the configured ‘substantility’ meet at a point X, as the transcendental object.
At this point, alpha and omega must meet, otherwise neither the original primary premis, nor the secondary conclusion can not support 'It’s Self.
If so, the whole evolutionary principle remains unsupported, and collapses , like some multifunction as observed by a mathematician who escapes me.
From a collapse, then, there is an eternal f
regeneration, because if it were not so, we couldn’t be here to think about it .
Therefore, there nerver can be but an appearent contradiction, ever.
That observed, afterlife is also borne on the wings of separate and relative constitution, and in this sense, the Buddhic notions make sense, that You can get where this is going.
The relative idea, the relative identity has an energy, a potential energy to will, the power within, and to either try to sustain the material/ ‘spiritual’=(energy) reification, that pertains to various sets of relatively identified contextual possibilities, to define the conscious , part of remarked spatial/ temporal space-time. It could go from an Absolute - hypothetical necessith, to actual sets of binary mixed multi functional adaptations.
The will to power such an engine, has need to presuppose sub sets, in various searches of memory. Where deletion or lack of memory results, the gaps become succedingly teified, and the will can not dilute those underlying structural basis
Hence leaving these certain areas presuppose a fear of letting go, because it appears as if it would require a solitary attempt. This forgets the incrimentally attached sub sets that require ‘It’ to stay afloat.
Therefore, the most elemental ’ substantial/ energy bit, holds the ‘gestalt’ together Uno a perceived eternal Set.
There can not be any other way, because the energy ’ out there’ is merely based on an assumptive postulate.
Eternal return is not quite synonymous to reincarnation, but the differences are conjunctive, down the line.