Absolute proof of reincarmatio/eternal return

In it’s lower level nominal form, many different souls appear as unaccepting of the primordial unity, of.consciessness per se. as all imcluaovd and primordial noumina, which has to be an eternal manifestation of being that, without which nothing could manifest.

Since it becomes.appearent as reductive, it de-volves the unity into a multiplicity multiplicity of.phenomenal awareness, whereas it is a necessary object(ive) of.the very multitude of.apprehension.

This is why, the pre-eminence of inter subjective similitude, is always reduced.toward the lowest common denominator of understandng, and this is why there can never be an expiration of this process.

We as members of the human community never can die, because the conscious unity is always generated anew, sine qua non there is the nothingness that mere individual existence can never prove otherwise.

The immensely short duration of metamorphic changes that evolution appears always to gain, can never reverse, even the bounds of this onto logical necessity, because the signs are coded within lower tier genetic signatures.

If, we can understand the Buddhic nature, then it is inconceivable that we should hold to an otherwise world of multi-personal puppetry, where some puppet master could direct a state of being, where natural processes would simply dissolve into a phenomenal nothingness.

The differentiation which create personal identity are based on periodical oscillations from seen and unseen sources, the material world differentiates via those who have more ‘material’ from those who have less.

The accumulation of wealth distinguishes people to be ‘seen’ , perceived as more individual, noticeable, etc.
The indigent are hardly noticed.
The immaterial world consisting of very broad types, fall into the indistinguishable category, and the strife toward notice becomes an archytypical process.
The fear of unnoticed is tantamount to diminished indication of notice, and that is tantamount to a kind of death.

Now, the evolution of ideas parallels these processes, and so Freud can argue for the unhappiness caused by sexual repression, for instance. The psychology of the ego, based on identifiable cues, do have a deeper social significance.
We are what we are thought, not what we eat.

Eating deals with the concern we have over our material needs, not our sense of predicated attributions of ideas associated with wants. Our spiritual wants, ironically, and actually are far more important factors , thus the thirst for knowledge, in times of crisis, or a critical examination of our circumstances, is much more formative. - The formation a of these pre-determined, -(and maybe they are more of a comparative defensive act)-
Ideas, are again , far more consequential then the shorter term hassles that accompany the necessity of pro during our daily bread.

The culmination of these processes lead to the conclusion that it is more expedient to fight with the pen, then the hand. Survival, thus, evolves through a series of rationalization that the pen comes up with, and others are obliged to follow, since the power of the pen, of the mind becomes able to force a subservience upon those who lack real knowledge of them.

The multitude learns by repetitious, rote learning, and so are at a disadvantage.

This subservient general ego, is what Freud observed to be unhappy, and lets face it, sexual unhappiness is what’s it all about-an overcoming of generational issues stemming on overcoming genetic inferiority.

In am attempt not to go far afield, lets get back to the more general thesis.

The evolution of social consciousness , has been periodically modified, revised, and at some critical moments, totally changed course. The material world can be said to have been upended, and reversely, albeit more often and with more persistence, reversely.

Generally the ideas which appear as defensive, are really formative. The precepts underlying current manifestations, are clothed as if they were transitory, thereby offering the suggestion of overwhelming social concurrence.

Yet, how far from the truth does the 'working class’s , the prolayariate has to opine the likeness of the Russian bear , led around the ring with a metal ring and a chain around it’s nose?

We are what we are, and not what we eat. Our food supply can vanish overnight, and yet we have to live on , on a minimal diet, near starvation, so as to perpetuate that formal evolutionary script, that has replaced the urge, by which we learned to determine the manifold available choices, to the justified ends that prescribes our bills of rights to our basic needs. In short, a prescription to the modus operandi of our lives.

What prescription is there in material accumulation for it’s own sake, that has become an overwhelming theme of our existence? (As opposed to a conceptual levity in art for it’s own sake? ).

The philosophy of language, prescribed and underwites this naive approach, sealing any chance of return, eternal or not, to it’s forgotten subscription. This obsession with the material benediction of the immediate, nihilized any chance of return, thus apparently sealing the fate of the vast majority in regaining the basic wants , the lifeblood of thematic protection against the very inception of , and the formation of very basic tool of adaptation against foes, who may impede protective measures to survival against more powerfully built genetically superior foes.

Now to the chase. -what gets to be known, is, that has been learned exegenically, through a combined reified idea, with those in process, and as such, it should come to no one’s surprise, if procedural changes do occur. In times of crisis, a suspension of belief leads some to consider that, opportunities to revise held opinions, be they of short, or longer duration.

The history of anti dialectical thinking, is it’s self a material re-formation of the very primal essential ideology, which , if, deducted, or reduced to it’s original preception , is tantamount to the very same bicameral mind in it’s ‘self’, the very essence that has become subservient To Its Self.

At this level the exogenic (exterior) effects become autonomous with the indicated, inherent, pre-formative sources, hence producing phenomenal shrinkage or expansions, -the very phenomenal myths that either result progressive expansion of ideal a-priori types, or, the opposite, of delimitong delimiting associative inducements into the anti-ideal.

This clash ultimately produces the coming of an informative singular event, a singularity akin to cosmic effects, such as a star-collapse into black holes, so compact, as to induce tunnels of reality links.

These tunnels, are the very representative forms of the nice I-channelling of the brain, and the outer and inner sourced objectives can reverse course in an in put and out put manner.

Biofeedback between the outer shell and the inner core of reality firm a high wired nexus here, and it becomes quantum linked to an evolving paradigmn, whose evolution is simulated.

The occult connects the simulation with the paradigmn, and the singularwithin the bounds of relative faith, as identity is a production within approachable limits of comprehension, (as Cantor, Leibnitz , Nietzche, Jesus Buddha came very close to comprehend.)

Jesus was right, and closest in proclaiming that if this process can be learned, even if taken on face value, ONE can never die.

Is there a hypothetical which can shed light on recurrence, that backs up other aligned and related pre-suppositions bearing on more certainty?

Such hypothesis may range in the gamut from less to more certainty.
Even such a proposition risks an underlying variability, based on factors such as: faith, opinion, bias, thereby giving the hypothesis a pseudo scientific appearance.

However, inverse speculation is like a mirror image, therefore, if reversal can be arguably based to it’s original suppositions that gave rise them.

In this light . with applying the theories of the relative nature that they can be held in/at bay, the contexts within them can vary.

Evolution may imply an inverse devolution.

More to the point, how can the advent of science play on the seemingly contrary notion of the general intelligence of the individual memory?

As the earliest forms of memory devices took informally very long times to develop, the more sophisticated reliance on specific applications has become shorter, and automatic.

The virtual realization of these processes is be coming obvious, as general construction of information technology have given way to more specificity, with more advanced relay systems between associated functions.

The dissolution, of real and artificial memory, tend to put such associations into automatic relay systems, where they resemble human unconscious states, very similar to dysfunctional states of disassociation.

The difference is, obvious: artificial memory never forgets as a human brain does, it can re-evoke and reconstruct the relay systems without any lapse , whereas .human intelligence can permanently disable the channels of connective neurons.

This is one overriding need for quantum computation, since to develop a sense of thought, a qualitative complexity has to be part of the program.

Even as these processes are only partially inclusive in various systems, by systemic multivarient functional equivalents need to calculate increasingly numerous bits of data, leading to increasing functional utilization of automatic systems.

Hence the syntaxes will be more functionally derive toward automatic thinking and shift considerations of general qualitative criteria into the lower recesses of the mind,

Therfore in terms of the left and right lobes, more quantitative functions of general concerns will be handled on presumed memory phases.

Eventually, very little of that will lend to recall, and presumptions will need to be ascertained as part and parcel of learning in general.

Atomists hypothesized the invisible particles which today has seem as a foreshadow of the quantum age of uncertainty.

Nowedays one need not be an Einstein to feel the secure world of the golden age.

The early thinkers were materialists, could not presume to think about a unified field theory, still only in another future’s possibility.

The ego, broken down into psychic elements, created a. Vision of the personality that reduced the abstraction of the self analogously into various forms of deified forms.of various structural patterns, fueled by neural energy sources which interact magnetically, supposedly inter as well as intra imagery, as well as dynamic/ magnetic interphase.

This ideas’ presupposition suggest a real continuum of both, the image and the development of selfhood .

The question of the will to survive becomes the focal point to the idea of the continuation through personal identity as reincarnated bounderies as sustained by existential sustenance of recognized forms of identity.

The question of determination and will enter this picture through increasing insubstiation of recognized patterns.

The effects of karmic law may fill in that question.

There is/should be correspondence between dispersion/dissociation and fear of life/death.

Underlying of primary repression is the fear of ego emtiness, in this sense Buddhism is a cover for intentional dissociation two fold: against fear of the darkness and the urge toward enlightenement.

In reference to form some mind of continuum between this current post, and then in spirals of looser associations with continually preeceeding ones, with a mind of anti advancing Fourier regression, I post the following:

'Psych

I have been trying to work around it.
It is from within the formation of the highest aesthetic ideals that I am trying to find a solution, and my efforts have finally came through.

The ideal is transcendent , and not imminent.

And transcendence is evolving, not reductive. Reductionism is a general collapse of phenomenon into the ontological immediacy.

The fallacious DasEIN cannot understand the collapse into a model as relating not to a particular as indentifiable to the metamorphosis ( of narcissus) where counsciousness of objective criteria should have thought to begin.

Instead, it mistakenly transvalued it’ s negative, by an intentional will to power.’

Meaning, an ontological collapse ( absurdum) need not manifest a singular insiolveability, but retain some semblance of the absolute rationality of Being It’s self, given Heidegger’s definition.

The absolute sense of identity in terms of an exclusive set of phenomenon:, is not determinitive on structural analysis.

It is always in motion, like the film of prior negatives of various mixes of indeterminate associations within other moving contexts.

Phenomenal reduction plays this on a faulty screen of evolving contexts, but within the larger frame of reference.( idea fixee) that sets an ever expanding contrast.

Such contrast does not end in the aesthetic, but progresses toward the Thetic.

At that level , beyond the level of absolute indiscriminate epoche, an enlighted absolution must be granted.

That judgement is certainly way beyond good and evil.

From there there is no looking back, even if the tendency to want to initially. The rest is axiomatic , with diminishing returns.

Fell sorry for those who’s reluctance to attempt to validate
reduces to a politically structured rationalization

Godd luck for something akin a Rubric Cubists first try .
For those in practice , it will be no contest.

A philosophical psychology can go farther than a psychologycal philosophy to further touch on this subject.

The very neat realization of this fact can be proposed by a simple symlogisn.:

Evolutional transcendental objectivism , posits the potential energy that can be required to set conscious awareness in motion on primary levels of sensation, ignition and social organization.

In the beginning, the slope of advancing this qualifying assumption, but the further along this progresses on a seeming 180 ° incline, the more quantitative substantial backup requires to 'keep things {straight} ’

Middle periods puts things into a doubtful focus, at a point when that quantifying ’ substance’ gets to be apprehended at a critical point between the formal primary supposition, and it’s qualifying sub principles—coinciding with calculating shorter arcs on a presupposed circle.

During evolution , the conscious realization reaches a calculable apex at an acute period, both as the geometric measurement approaches the perpenducilar, or the absolute axiomatic contradiction.

At this decisive moment the so called objective enlightenement follows, of course not everybody happy, and a romantic reaction develops, leading eventually to the modern onslought that we find ourselves today.

But what does all this have to do with afterlife, or reincarnation, as some prefer to call it?

Well everything, one may say, and this is why:

Let’ s start in the extreme uncertainty we find our self living in, ar the present time. Matter has been reduced to the uncertainty with the matter/ energy comondrum, vis, the cat in the box graphic illustration of uncertainty. Without getting tangled up in that, let’s incorporate the primal initial premise and the it to the secondary one, desiring a connectionbetween the two.

The sub Thetic infinitely reducible arc of the circle or ring, present just such a transcendental object, and as matter is further and further reduced into snakier and smaller bits of energy, the original evolution of the configured ‘substantility’ meet at a point X, as the transcendental object.

At this point, alpha and omega must meet, otherwise neither the original primary premis, nor the secondary conclusion can not support 'It’s Self.

If so, the whole evolutionary principle remains unsupported, and collapses , like some multifunction as observed by a mathematician who escapes me.

From a collapse, then, there is an eternal f
regeneration, because if it were not so, we couldn’t be here to think about it .

Therefore, there nerver can be but an appearent contradiction, ever.

That observed, afterlife is also borne on the wings of separate and relative constitution, and in this sense, the Buddhic notions make sense, that You can get where this is going.

The relative idea, the relative identity has an energy, a potential energy to will, the power within, and to either try to sustain the material/ ‘spiritual’=(energy) reification, that pertains to various sets of relatively identified contextual possibilities, to define the conscious , part of remarked spatial/ temporal space-time. It could go from an Absolute - hypothetical necessith, to actual sets of binary mixed multi functional adaptations.

The will to power such an engine, has need to presuppose sub sets, in various searches of memory. Where deletion or lack of memory results, the gaps become succedingly teified, and the will can not dilute those underlying structural basis

Hence leaving these certain areas presuppose a fear of letting go, because it appears as if it would require a solitary attempt. This forgets the incrimentally attached sub sets that require ‘It’ to stay afloat.

Therefore, the most elemental ’ substantial/ energy bit, holds the ‘gestalt’ together Uno a perceived eternal Set.

There can not be any other way, because the energy ’ out there’ is merely based on an assumptive postulate.

Eternal return is not quite synonymous to reincarnation, but the differences are conjunctive, down the line.

.The etheriality of being.
An average human being lives 60+ years. Maybe slightly more or less.

Maybe 35 years lived in conscious productive life.

During that time he or she has to construct reality from existentially derived forms of being , sourced through genetic-memetic channeled crossovers between progressively enriched ‘conscious’ buildup of symbolic patterns.

This process is both inclusively expressive and exclusively impressive, forming functional patterns as if through templates or levels of memoric hystory.

The extent of it’s set boundaries progressively, by functional historicity, tend toward boundary reduction at first , through logico- functionality, of a ‘literal’ one to one climb, deplicating a singular, correspondence.

Later, a quadratic functional process looses this similarly mirrored ‘reality’ and the process morphs into a simulation

Finally all reality is conceived at some level if reality, as if, all points of inception become both: original and simulated.

In 35 years of ‘consciousness’ mankind reduced his own individuality into the simulated parts all reflecting each other.

The primal 1 to 1 simulation produces a third, which is a way to fom the elementary third .

The buildup of many unaccountable thirds become consistent with the absolute retro derivation of it’s being , becoming other than simply 'it’s self, as it becomes aware of it’s primal derivation: In becoming aware that it’s being is actually a simulation of the composite gross total of it’s self, it reduces it’s self into more general apperceptions, crossing tentatively into absolute modal patterns of inconsistent and absurd forms.

For that to ecist, it is grounded in infinity and eternity, because those are mere conceptual tools, however coinciding within eternally incepted memory that has always coincided with Itself.

That stage of this primary coincidence, absurd on it’s face, is reified within a ‘metamorphosis’.

See: ’ The Metamorphosis of Narcissus’ as a primal boundary situation within near infinitely recurring crossover references.

The simpler view is that natural selection parallels natural science, in as much it develops an intermediary we call - consciousness.

The ail is for an evolution of awaremess, of what there is to know and experience about anything and finally everything.

That. progression from an assumed nothing toward any Thing to everything we call god.(God)

What we call the self, ourself, we experience as mirrored through and developed through other mirrored images , which are formed through various other cross pollinated sources of images, images of ideas, some exhibiting form, others not. The body, may also result from genetically coded , cross pollinated strains of chanelled strains of energy, and the may connect and disconnect from the re-elected energy sourced 'self-consciousness

These things, some deeper, more essential them others create formative phenomena, some apprehended through perception long ago, and some only recently. They become very distinctly unique at times, and appear to separate both genetically and psychically or the unite or reunite again.

The can and do develop preferences, and birth and death do at times differentiate a volitional component, to either fit into groups and sets minimally differentiated out of fear of uniqueness, or the fear of determined somilarity, limited only by volition or a progressive determination

The books of the dead, Egyptian and Tibetan , shed light on an intuitive travel of the soul.

There is a plethora of impressions in every lifetime, and the ‘Soul’ may have indescribably large number of alikenesses to form any number of configured particulars within an equally large number of and size of sets.

The proof is in the pudding, , conscious life is no different from what we try to describe in sub-consciousness, as in superconsciousness.

Memetic consciousness and karmic law support the basic quantum measure of underlying Lamarkianism , as a premeasure to the evolutionary idea surrounding genetic inheritance

Therefore, based on what we know, it is more credible than not to support the above, as is the idea of a following congruence .

There are really no gaps to knowledge, except through ex post facto reductionism.

A simpler proof of reincarnation can be shown by looical certainty:

"Death is impossible for logical and derivitive reasons.

  1. When a man senses the edge of the planet, he fears a drop off point.

  2. Similarly, the end point of life is an analogous sensation.

There for by Wittgenstein’s proof of ianalogy bu similarity, it follows that a development psych

The conscious differentiation of units of awareness , developmentally integral self awereness into smaller units of identifiability, as autonomy is an index of self awareness, runs counter to a biologically , basic process of cell division.
The anologg consists of less identifiable autonomously developed regionally identifiable units, progressively and hystorically into larger , more generraly identifiable trait descriptions.

On the other hand, a refocusing into smaller units of evolutionary development by trait associations formed out of more and mire reverse differentiations, goes counter to developmental physiology, and is reactive to formally bound causitive associations.

The latter appears retroactivaly as more ‘conscious’ of counter or reversely signified links to understanding the ‘self’

Whereas the differentiation knows no bounds, and escapes from it’s hystorically developed sense of self, by thinning out the spacially-material composition of it’s material signifiers

Ultimately the break occurs between the cogito and the cogitant, relative to the rescen experience of self Descartes brought into awareness.

The significance if the event if that Colitis was not realized with the emphatic developmental significance it has caused progressively in and up to recent times.

What can we look towaRd forwardly evolving senses of identifiable markers in self consciousness?

And how does that signify in an increasing rate of development toward non identifiable consciousness , based on non identifiability on trait like signifiers?

In a brave new world , where mankind will naturally loose this marker which pertained to historically to more identifiable racial and ethnic inceptors, and with the rapidly accelerating rate of change into less generally identifiable dufferences, what effect will the unidentified gap between the reified stages of development? Minimal.

Causation will slowly diminishe as a linear concept and that linearity will be followed by the returning analogous concept of the straight line being a phenomenal illusion of being part of larger curved entitie of conscious manifestations.

The tiny specks if atomic and molecular entities will reconnect within cosmic spheres of influence, and the consciousness of the cogitant-cogito will morph into a gap less unidentifiable material like masses.( example: people)

This mass, of humanity, will form aggragates for & with cyborgs and computer systemed robots & systems, at first, until the material amalgam is flushed out, even the differentiation with lesser developed species will drop out of significance.

This mass of intelligent design will eitheralize due to cosmic and intercosmically developed models, on a dramatic scale if increasing rate of change, resulting in the necessaryly developed many world interpretation, followed by it’s total and equally pressing need of re-integration .

That this is soatio-temporarily indescribable is sufficient proof for it’s imminence.

This imminence has absolute formal dimensions through timespacd, and has always had it and always fir ever more.

It has never been created it destroyed, singularly or in mass, there is no ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE

An idea just occured, to view life(s) as if through a looking glass. The way life coincides with the geometria of a continuing process, is by and large a late discovery, of man’s internal computer-mind , which literally is a simulation of it’s own objective.

That phenomena requires the synchronous development of a perceived through an agent, can not rule out the development of inorganic material as prior event, but that priority fades as the synchronicity reaches the level where the dual aspect simulates the progression of both.

That is where the race between the turtle and the hare becomes a literal description of the objective relative race becoming a matter of accountability, the difference between the logical-geometrical description and it’s quantumized difference increasingly reduces toward the absolute simultaneous.

The continuous generation/regeneration of this process, eventually links with it’s own self conception, and appears as if both are somehow indiginously related. That comes after that ‘objectivuty’ is computed, by extension of that inherently developed extension of the computing function into AI, as artificially simulated processes were somehow different and extrinsic from the inception of a different set of source of that object.

Only a virtually developed set if sequencial steps through the continuum can prefix the idea of simulation, and in a way it is pre-shadowed as a sub extistent realm of ‘being’

Simultaneous events only develop through a measured time which de-differentiates progressively into it’self, as though nihilizing temporal duration, as it progressively develops.A feat cosmic irony!

How does that bode in terms of defining the differential aspects of what we define as reality? What states of existence could be designated as more.appearently real than others?

So, where am I going with this in relation to ideas such as repetitiin, eternal de-occurance, de-incarnatiin and such?
Can anyone here at this time only signifies one other, but remaining anymous, , on board, hopefully not bored?
(Such will to remain undesignated is tantamount of exclusion from the Design or the objectively functional fs-integration necessary to build Its self into a reasonable assessment of inclusion?!?

As a function of probability, the ‘soul’ is multi dimensional and it contains pluralistic phenomenal ingredients, analogous to the morphological content of the human embryo as the sum total of all it’s derivative predecessors.

This simple fact only questions wether a progressive analysis can describe the mirroring process of analogical-through systemic progression through and with it’s cyber-functional simulation toward the increasing depth of multiples of doubled sets of various reflexive structures if organization.

That such complexity is based on prearrangements of modeled ideograms and structural reifications, or they are always work on processing of available modems that eternally recur, but without a formally based structural hierarchy- may actually approach the sane redundancy that caused it’s progression in the first place.

How significant van re-cognition of this stage be? Can it ensure new basis of deified models that withstand the relativistic changes on both ends of the equation?

Again a pointless rhetorical question, and the proof, if there is one lies in the simplicity of observing the imminence that
is the only condition through which transcendental reality can be proposed.

The transcendental reality progresses to a certainty, once that plane ( of consciousness) reaches the nearest immediate proximity toward it’s maximally imminent- phase.

At that point the difference becomes analogically identically similar, so as to realize the most basic , yet paradoxically appearing questions.

The only possible power, appears to be, that binding universal power , however it’s defined and used as certainly the most often repeated cliché of all times: the power of love.
On the most superentangled level of apprehension, that force-field, may be the primary developmental source of all progressive evolutionary process, and It’s hidennesd, is only masked by the very simplicity by which it really does effect.

Since it’s rarely humanly possible to achieve it on the vastly effected plane of nominal understanding: does the evolution of probabilistically principles advance toward it’s anthropomorphic shift.

The archeological and the morphological connect did begin at the very limits of reason, hence. the birth of the mystical traditions are appearing more as futuristic and post futuristic , credible routes of transmissions of knowledge.

The probability curve of miracles, goes up as more and more receptivity becomes opened in the supposed ‘World Consciousness’ relieving protestations such as those that decried the idealized passing of a ‘romantic idiom’ with which ‘welt-schmerz’ was described around the duration of the last couple of hundred years.

Fleeting thought

We must exist on a unified field together but not in the form we think

Case at hand: some can not realized them selves even imminently , so the transcending is no big game changer.

This is more a gut level feeling, based on personal experience since time immemorial.

Deleted sorry