youre so boring
Ha!
Ran out of one-liners shit-Stain?
Why don’t you dust off that clever wit of yours, or has ILP atrophied you too?
i will never run out of one liners
shut up bitch
lol u mad
The goal of iamastupidcunt, is all-inclusion.
This is why she appeals to the “other”, this is why she constantly admits that she may be wrong.
She is virtue signalling, appealing to the fear of being excluded from the herd.
She’s saying: you are wrong, i am wrong - because there is no truth - so let us come to a compromise and each tolerate the others error.
so if you don’t offer an absolute certain truth, then all are equally wrong. That’s ideal because now we can come to a compromise and agree to tolerate each others idiocy.
A “fulminating fanatic” objectivists, is one that excludes, without offering an absolute final complete truth.
She equates truth with popularity, and appeals to the “other” to gain popular validity.
She admits she may be wrong, signalling that no absurdity will be excluded. All weakness, all stupidity, is welcomed.
She wants to build the largest herd ever…humanity as a single herd.
She triggers innate, primal anxieties about being ostracized or excluded… certain death in nature.
She will embrace all if they tolerate her ignorant idiocy.
Let’s support Mary Land - the litmus test of abortion, of bad judgement - because we will all find ourselves in her situation and will need the help of the herd.
Someone to bail us out of a bad judgement call, a bad choice.
This is her psychological appeal to the herd, to weakness, to mediocrity.
She has no clue about anything.
She refuses to define the terms she throws around because this will expose how clueless she is - and by defining a term contradicts another’s definition…and her idiocy wants all idiots to feel welcomed.
This is why she repeats, describing her enemies, that they think in us vs them…because she is all-inclusive.
Doesn’t mater how stupid your convictions are, you will be welcomed if you water your wine and make compromises.
Contradicting herself in the process.
How can all be included when those who reject all-inclusion are excluded?
All she feels she has to do is find a flaw, a incompleteness in any theory…this automatically makes it just as wrong as any other theory.
Certainty or total uncertainty. If you aren’t allowing for any alternative - no mater how absurd - you are a fascist. All must become equally uncertain.
If not omniscience then ignorance. If not omnipotence then impotence.
Either/Or, simple and effective among simpletons…her target audience - those “others” she constantly appeals to in her notes.
What are the long-term consequences of such herd-psychology?
She doesn’t know; she doesn’t care.
All must be included, because nobody knows for certain…there is no omniscience.
Identifying with victims is the natural impulse of life that finds in existential uncertainties and cosmic indifference a threat it cannot rationally cope with.
Those unable to empathize, must sympathize or antipathize…projecting themselves into everything they find incomprehensible and disturbing.
All becomes part of a collective when all is a projection, then emulated and adopted as a communal truth.
Projection is the identifying method.
The midwit, dimwit, can only project himself/herself, into another’s circumstances and find in them his only act of individuality.
God on omnipresence becomes the abstraction of circumstances - god of the machine - necessitating human choices by shaping the circumstances that make them inevitable.
Man as a mere mechanical representation with no participatory effect.
Midwits and dimwits - depending no their constitution - have always sought insights in mysticism - using themselves as validation.
Those who cannot understand humanity must seek guidance in the stars, or in their projections of themselves into their mysterious activities.
Man saw himself everywhere…in rivers, lakes, in cloud formations, in the moon and sun…in stones and mud…in trees and bushes, in animals and other men.
Everywhere he looked he saw himself reflected back and was comforted - the incomprehensible made intimate.
All became subjective, and objectivity a myth reserved only for the gods.
So, they can only perceive another’s opinions as projections of their secret fears and desires…and by doing so expose their own, having already revealed their method.
By outsourcing themselves they’ve made revealing it all the easier to endure…because they so want to be seen, but not judged.
The dilemma of emerging self-awareness. The human condition.
I in Vegas here found a man I could talk to just another dim witted fellow, and as he was leaving, I told him in reference to beauty and the beast, course he didn’t get it, couldn’t, I opined the door for him Boeing graciously , remarking- ( it was a gurl) “ beauty first, fools last” he of course went ‘out’ first, and here I am lasting , lest to tell you of this anecdote.
Moral;; not everything that appears disappears
( by a conversive process of sight unseen to feel emphatically.
Naturally selected hierarchies are replaced by nihilistic memes and their current victim hierarchies.
Now all is inverted.
What was once strong is now weak; what was once weak is now strong.
Victim is now victimizer - human retribution expressing existential resentment.
The feeble - meek - shall dominate the earth - inherit it - if all is reduced to self-abnegating ethicology, exploiting man’s increasing self-awarenss.
Ouroboros making man feel guilty of his needs/desires - the necessities of his continuing existence.
Pagans used to honour their victims - thanksgiving - but now they must identify with what they hunted to meet their needs.
Man identifies with the hunted.
No longer hunter…his empathy is now sympathy - antipathy vilified and shamed into silence.
Man is now the eternal victim of predation.
Who but existence personified could stand in for the hunter?
Cowardice forces him to seek validation in mysticism.
How can he survive if he does not victimize another life?
Shame and guilt weaponized, force feeble men to justify their needs/desires, in accordance with victim identity.
He is now both victim and victimizer.
He is now not to be held responsible for what he does, or thinks, or needs.
He is a victim of happenstance, of circumstances, or causality.
Something other, someone else, must be held accountable for his ‘evil deeds.’
This is simply true, in reverse motion, that seeks to pinpoint the sequential specificity belonging in certain groupings, yes.
But this was an age, where such reified partiality was de facto the rule, rather than the exception. Uncertainty replaced the nihilized group, which increases hyperphenetically proportional to the rate of acceleration which inversely affects sequential groupings, with expected corelational results.
That changes the game plan of continuing the specified abstracted ration, by a phenominally convergence to reflect such change.
The change becomes inordinately narrower between the victim and the victimizer continuity, refracting a less identifiable continua, which plays havoc with the differentiability of identifying specific singularly adapted points of functional signification.
Assemblence of particularly identified groupings, becomes more challenging, and the genetic theory gains ground over memetic expediency.
The rest gives more power to will the significance of this in version.
Most people are troubled by philosophical questions that are entirely the consequence of their failure to correctly use language.
Like the question of ‘free-will’, or ‘morality/ethics’…or ‘value-judgements’.
The link between physis and metaphysis - ideal/real - is linguistic.
Anchoring words to experienced existence limits the degree of metaphysical absurdity the mind can indulge in.
A triad, corresponding to Plato’s psyche representation of a charioteer, is at work here.
Physis, the observable, experienced, world we call nature, or cosmos, or reality.
Metaphysis, as its foundation, supporting the structure of physis by remaining aligned with it; in harmony.
Ideal, as a projection upwards towards the future - a desired objective. If it is to be attainable it must remain connected with physis, and aligned with both physis and metaphysis.
Corresponding to Past/PRESENCE-PRESENT/Future, or Body/Nervous System/Mind = Determined/DETERMINING/To be Determined
Semiotics connect them all.
Language ([size=80]code[/size]) is of the Nervous System, connecting to mind and body, creating a synthesis.
Is not DNA a code?
Nihilism is simple.
It is a defensive reaction to a threatening, indifferent existence.
A defensive linguistic attempt to “correct existence” - heal existence, humanize existence - altering it in a way that benefits an individual, i.e., comforts him, and satisfies his needs/desires.
Any negation of existence is, by definition, nihilistic…ergo nihilism is ubiquitous in human ideologies and dogmas and is differentiated by degree: from selective to absolute rejection of natural order.
The usual method is using language to redefine concepts so as to convert them from negative to positive forces relative to life or to the individual’s subjective preferences.
Rather than understanding nature and using this understanding to adjust it to human preferences a nihilist will remain detached, focused on redefining words to accommodate his objectives.
Since this is useless, nihilists usually strive to construct collectives, within which these reinterpretations hold true.
For example, homosexuality and transsexuality in nature are not lifestyle choices, but comprises imposed upon individuals due to environmental pressures.
Both are indications of an imbalance that is naturally selected out of existence.
Men try to establish these imbalances as their new norm, attempting to usurp natural selection so as to preserve and propagate this natural imbalance.
There are many reasons, but one is control - power.
Those who are burdened by unfit mutations become increasingly dependent on collectives, and this dependence makes them more controllable.
Cult of victimhood presupposes the absence of individual free-will as a necessary requirement of its perfect innocence; its rejection of all degrees of ‘tainting responsibility.’ There are no ‘innocent victims’ without this complete rejection of culpability in the determination of the conditions of one’s lived experience.
An absolute denial of free-will is tantamount to attaining a state of moral purification – a complete victim of otherness is the highest ethical pinnacle.
Victim status increases in proportion to the degree of innocence an individual can claim, so the denial of free-will is an expression of a prevailing victim psychology. Everything negative that occurs to an individual or a group, must be a product of another’s hatred, or envy, or wickedness. They have no part in why these others behaved towards them in the ways they did; they are innocent, their actions, pure; if need be they can be declared to be supernatural in origin.
Why are people of mixed race almost always referred to as ‘half-black’ or ‘half-Asian,’ never half-white? Indoctrination into the victim-cult is an explanation.
We always identify with the weakest, the sufferer; we intuitively know existence is suffering so we like to associate ourselves with the highest level of existing.
Given the current, i.e., modern, manifestation of nihilism, we can identify its particular strains by the degree and the type of semiotics being applied, viz., their distinctive linguistic jargon acting as an ideological fingerprint. This particular modern variant of psychological defensiveness, draws nourishment from earlier variants and more so from its ancient origins in Abrahamic spiritual nihilism.