aniceguyposts

aniceguy · October 23, 2021, 5:56pm

First of all…the story with the Franks and the nazis is not so obvious…when they were a niche party, they actually blamed the Franks for fighting heathens and spreading Christianity, even invented conspiracies to do so, blaming Franks of massacring and pillaging Germanic heathens(typical nazi hypocrisy) but when they went main-stream, they obviously began to appropriate every single thing as a Germanic national and racial supremacy. Hitler praised Schopenhauer, he praised Copernicus, and so forth…everything that could be pinned as a proof of their invented pseudo-racial superiority, he took and claimed it being so. If they had somehow won, they would have claimed all the great Frenchmen were of some secret origin, tied to Germany, just like the wackos on SHITYHSELF invent their own conspiracies to do the same exact thing…

Pedro_I_Rengel · October 23, 2021, 5:59pm

Yes, but Hitler’s way is not the only way.

As long as you can find some (necessarily) bullshit way to make the ‘white man’ seem superior, it’s kosher.

Hitler only did that because he wanted to go to war with France, which was rationalist-conservative at that point.

Pedro_I_Rengel · October 23, 2021, 6:00pm

What do you take us for, boy?

Pedro_I_Rengel · October 23, 2021, 6:00pm

Jesus.

aniceguy · October 23, 2021, 6:06pm

ok buddy

aniceguy · October 24, 2021, 5:54pm

Christianity must always remember that it is the religion of the “Logos.” It is faith in the “Creator Spiritus,” in the Creator Spirit, from which proceeds everything that exists. Today, this should be precisely its philosophical strength, in so far as the problem is whether the world comes from the irrational, and reason is not, therefore, other than a “sub-product,” on occasion even harmful of its development or whether the world comes from reason, and is, as a consequence, its criterion and goal. The Christian faith inclines toward this second thesis, thus having, from the purely philosophical point of view, really good cards to play, despite the fact that many today consider only the first thesis as the only modern and rational one par excellence. However, a reason that springs from the irrational, and that is, in the final analysis, itself irrational, does not constitute a solution for our problems. Only creative reason, which in the crucified God is manifested as love, can really show us the way. In the so necessary dialogue between secularists and Catholics, we Christians must be very careful to remain faithful to this fundamental line: to live a faith that comes from the “Logos,” from creative reason, and that, because of this, is also open to all that is truly rational.

aniceguy · October 25, 2021, 1:51pm

Subjectivity is the mental prison a simpleton is condemned to suffer.
His lack of any ability o become objective, to transcend this mental limitation is what identifies him.

For example, unable to abandon his established convictions concerning other he will never question or doubt what he’s already decided about it.
Instead he will accuse the other of lying or contradicting himself, meaning that it isn’t the idiot’s convictions about other but the other who is responsible for this contradiction.
Such a mind can never improve itself, can never grow, because it fails to appreciate the source of the error in himself.
Furthermore, such minds are also prone to over-estimate self as a means of compensating for their intuited underestimation of themselves.
The degree of the overestimation indicating the degree of a lack of an objective self-awarness in relation to other.
This divergence is then projected upon the other, who repeatedly fails to validate the established conviction.

All of it is related to what I’ve said about projection and sympathy/antipathy, relative to empathy.
We all begin with the same foundation in self-awarness. This self-awarness establishes the standard by which we begin to evaluate what is alien, the mysterious other - emergent self-awarness.
The average mind remains there. His/Her method is the easy projection of whatever he’s discovered about himself/herself into another’s circumstances, imagining himself/herself in the other’s shows, so to speak, and how he/she would feel, what he/she would think and how she/he would cope.
This is the first stage.
To advance from it one would have to emotionally distance oneself from the plight of the other and eliminate himself from a final judgment and understanding.
A tweaking of degrees based on a precise, and honest, appreciation of oneself.
Other is not oneself in a different circumstance - this is a feminine way of understanding based on similarities, tending towards absolute uniformity; other is defined by its differences from self - differences of degree not of absolutes - and it is the differences that define other relative to self.
Self-knowledge is essential - objective, honest brutal self-knowedge. This self-knowledge acts as a standard, a sounding board to adjust divergence of other relative to self - both negatively and positively, the latter being more difficult to achieve than the former because it would require a recognition and appreciation of an other’s superior trait.
The antagonist/enemy must be evaluated objectively, otherwise defeating him will be impossible.
A misevaluation of other will fail to overcome it - recognizing how and if is also crucial.
It opens up a path to be taken, beginning with self-improvement, self-correction, self-control, and acceptance of what cannot be overcome - wisdom - but can only be endured, leading to a decision to find a new path based on what is attainable rather than ideal.

The natural proclivity to “err on the side of caution” has cultivated the masculine impulse to throw caution to the wind, and act, letting the chips fall where they will. It’s a strategy of masculine competitiveness, determining who can endure the highest risks so as to enjoy the highest rewards - see self-handicapping as fitness signaling.
Feminization means changing this fitness signalling to victim signalling - exploiting the parental instincts of man.
This is why females acquire the infantile, rounded form.
See, also, how victimhood is part of Abrahamism producing the hyperbolic compensation of claiming divine worthiness - choseness - or of knowing a occult secret no other can ever know other than through a mediating authority full of occult verbosity referring to nothing but more text.

schizoid word salad if there ever was one

aniceguy · October 25, 2021, 6:38pm

Objectivity is knowing - not agreeing or liking, nor disliking - but knowing the merits of your enemy’s world-view.
Empathy is understanding - not sympathizing not antipathizing - but sharing in the feelings, motives, sensation of what you find most deplorable and/or nauseating.
Subjectivity is life’s normal condition - it is life relating with, judging, evaluating other; it is outward perception of otherness.
With the development of self-consciousness the possibility of objectivity begins - it is a perception, from a third person perspective, of other and of oneself.
As objectivity becomes increasingly sophisticated - advances towards a harmony with the world’s indifference - the mind can gradually triangulate other and self within environment, or in relation to an objective - either of the self or of the other - with minimal emotional automatic prejudices.

psycho-analytical and pseudo-psychological vomit. there is no magical objectivity…all human cognitive activity is subjective and then we can differentiate two types of the meta-subjective cognition: subjective and objective; first thing to do is to throw out the trivial distinction and assume that we are not dealing with lying and take the next step…what would be an objective cognition, besides the obvious, if there ever was one? and what would be its opposite, if we assume that cognition must work on a binary basis and there is nothing to be discussed besides these two words…is belief in a God objective? is accepting the mathematical propositions and working on them objective? what even is thinking? what even is cognition in this context? is is completely self-referential? or is it the outcome of its own processes? how does the external world factor into a supposed objectivity? for example: is belief in a god objective if the person believes but does not lie about God at all? I think this is a pretty nonsensical question and a worthless tirade…words are simple…and ambiguous…you dont orient yourself on definitions of words…its not like a dictionary where you simply look up a commonly accepted meaning of the word and move on…what is objectivity the idiot asks…then a simple answer…simple for a simpleton…what objectivity actually is is a tremendously complicated and difficult philosophical topic. show me one subjective person that does not flinch when it is burnt with fire…and then show me one objective person, that knows its objectivity is clean from all sources of subjectivity in its life…an arrogant manic moron.

aniceguy · October 25, 2021, 6:48pm

Our knowledge of cognition is very rudimentary and it remain inaccessible to us almost completely, despite what the Yank generations washed in Freudianism, AI overestimation, quack Psychology, IQ research and so forth think. The charlatan speaks about this as if its obvious…we have not even conquered basic medical issues…yet the Yanks are already walking over human cognition.

aniceguy · October 25, 2021, 10:28pm

Is not using an anonymous platform to talk to anonymous people not disrespectful towards oneself? The more I think about it, the more I think it is true. Some autistic pencil-neck kook comes and talks shit in your face in real life and tries to embarrass you in-front of public, you just slap him in the face…some kook spreads gossip and smears about you publicly, you knock at his house very soon…but here…on the internet…everything is blurred…some shithead comes talking to you whilst laying in front of his filthy room, 100lbs obese and high out of his mind and you, assuming you have somebody normal in-front of you, waste your time taking him seriously…

aniceguy · October 25, 2021, 10:36pm

The Indian knew how to live without wants, to suffer without complaint, and to die singing.

Alexis de Tocqueville
youtube.com/watch?v=i0u0zjr … Cash-Topic
great song which reminded me of this quote by the great Tocqueville, the Indians really died singing, the 1960s masquerade with clowns like Brandon and the lefties bringing them into a supposed centre is artificial and false. The Indian is dead because his land is dead and his way of life is dead.

aniceguy · October 25, 2021, 11:29pm

aniceguy · October 25, 2021, 11:34pm

I remember discussing euthanasia with my mother who worked at a hospital her whole life and her telling me about a patient with a liver cancer who was constantly shitting himself(because of the damage to his liver) and(because of the acid) rotting alive because even though they washed him constantly, the acid in the shit still wrecked the skin it touched…and there was nothing they could do…my mother is more Nietzschean than all the college, pencil-neck autistic kooks put together, as is the hospital staff in general.
Appreciate your life, think of good and do good.

aniceguy · October 26, 2021, 2:23pm

You want more masculine conflict? like what? should we take knives, clubs, swords, sticks, fists to a park and have a go at it because we disagree over politics? are you people fucking insane or what???

aniceguy · October 26, 2021, 10:08pm

youtube.com/watch?v=X3EtGZO … travagante
beauty…it has the capacity to inspire and uplift when you find what speaks to your own soul and it is truly beautiful. true beauty and a true aesthetic experience is ruthless, intolerant, discriminant…it flashes out the ugly, the sick, the twisted and perverted and lowly in yourself and others in your life immediately and serves it up to you on a plate to eat…it takes up space in your mind and in your soul and asks you why you are cutting its place to expand for thrash… some day, you will experience your last morning and your last sun-set and will fall asleep the last time, as we all do…remember, that each thing you do, you did for eternity to come.

aniceguy · October 26, 2021, 10:23pm

What is the modern Yanks soul made of? superstition, Freudianism, Scientism and anarchy. You immediately know when you are speaking to somebody washed in Freudianism because they speak as if they know their or yours soul and have worked out all there is to do with brains, or somebody who is superstitious and hence immediately passive-aggressive or is a believer in scientism and hence arrogant and a fanatical materialist by his own logic or its lack.

aniceguy · October 26, 2021, 10:58pm

youtube.com/watch?v=kzNpD9D … oseNetwork
great mind, mentions Comte as an inventor of this thinking, who is a father of Communism, not Marx, as all experts on the internet falsely believe because they are thick.

aniceguy · October 27, 2021, 11:58am

Anarchism is wanting to destroy before you already build something new to take the place of the destroyed without even more destruction.

aniceguy · October 27, 2021, 2:39pm

The ugly and unattractive nerds are simply jealous of those who they see are attractive to females. Its a simple and ugly jealously, nothing more; whatever the crackpot conspiracies they want to use to justify their jelousy. They see attractive females, they see their boobs and their asses, they see them and are mad that they cant get them…end of story.

aniceguy · October 27, 2021, 2:57pm

youtube.com/watch?v=k7972uf … heim-Topic
Those neo-nazi crackpots who ridicule rap(rightfully) and listen to this kind of thing are just funny in their idiocy. This is as bad musically and just as based on evoking the primitive as rap is.