Geography of a woman

Someone send me this on WhatsApp.

Geography Of A Woman:
Between 18 and 22, a woman is like Africa. Half discovered, half wild, fertile and naturally Beautiful!

Between 23 and 30, a woman is like Europe. Well developed and open to trade, especially for someone of real value.

Between 31 and 35, a woman is like Spain, very hot, relaxed and convinced of her own beauty.

Between 36 and 40, a woman is like Greece, gently aging but still a warm and desirable place to visit.

Between 41 and 50, a woman is like Great Britain, with a glorious and all conquering past.

Between 51 and 60, a woman is like Israel,has been through war, doesn’t make the same mistakes twice, takes care of her business.

Between 61 and 70, a woman is like Canada, self preserving, but open to meeting new people.

After 70, she becomes Tibet. Wildly beautiful, with a mysterious past and
the wisdom of the ages. An adventurous spirit and a thirst for spiritual knowledge.

and…

THE GEOGRAPHY OF A MAN

Between 1 and 99, a man is like Pakistan - ruled by nuts!!

With love,
Sanjay

:slight_smile: :wink: This Isreal still thinks it is Great Britain.

This puts me at about 60.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fauja_Singh

I haven’t gotten past 22 :confused:

I’ll be sending this to my friend in Pakistan… he’ll love it :smiley:

What are - according to the opening post of this thread - gays and lesbians, “shemales” and “hefemales” then? Pakistani immigrants and immigrants in Pakistan? :stuck_out_tongue:

Or, Israel rather wants to be considered as Great Britain in the eyes of the others.

With love,
Sanjay

Why you and Kris are so eager to become a senior citizen?

With love,
Sanjay

Well, that old Sikkh gentleman seems to be an exceptional case.

With love,
Sanjay

No. They are like modern US.

no attachment from the past and no expectations from the future also. It is good in some ways but bad also in more ways.

With love,
Sanjay

That does not follow as a conclusion from your opening post.

First of all, i already mentioned that those conclusions are not mine. I am just reporting those.
Having said that, i still do not think i sidestepped from the OP.

with love,
sanjay

They are like non industrialized nations, having to make do with what nature gave them.

Naah, I never cared how others see me. You either like me or not. I care how I see myself wether I like me. And I do not see myself as a Senior at only 52. Junior sure, :slight_smile: :slight_smile: .
My original post was jest BTW.

At 52, you are still one year senior than me.
Having said that, I never get the feeling that I am old, at least till now. Though, I certainly feel maturity in me now.

With love,
Sanjay

I was just saying this: “That does not follow as a conclusion from your opening post.” Not more. I was merely referring to your statement in the opening post and nothing else. With humor. So, to me, it was just irrelevant whether you or another person originally mentioned what you wrote in the opening post. What I wanted to know from you was the answer to the question (in other words) : Why US and not Pakistan?

I meant *I haven’t gotten past 22.

My male friend in Pakistan agreed with the last line, but he wasn’t happy about it :neutral_face:

This kind of categorizing is a nigh-perfect reflection of the mentality of modern society where femininity is celebrated and the little masculinity that is left is ostracized and tried to be made ashamed of itself.

Yes, women are wildly beautiful after 70.

Yes, men are ruled by nuts, all men are so simple and base and controlled by their sexuality they can be summed up in one short sentence about their simpleness and baseness and submission to their genitals.

Females are so mysterious and complex and beautiful and intelligent and everything else virtuous, while males are not.

Imagine if the reverse happened: 10 lines celebrating men and masculinity and one line reducing women to simple, base sexual objects?

What would be the response?

My guess is, THIS:

The writing was done in humor, jest, tongue in cheek, not to be taken seriously. Its not flattering to either gender but, done with humor to both.

You know, I wouldn’t even mind it if it was GOOD humour. But females don’t have a sense of humour, they never had to develop one because they never had problems with attaining popularity or seducing males.

It’s so unfunny that it seems to me that no real effort was put in the humour part, as if the primary intention was to celebrate women and shit on men. Whatever.