Arminius wrote:The question misses nothing.
Peter Kropotkin wrote:the question also misses the little Russian problem.
Putin is bat shit crazy and could pull the trigger just to boost
his ego.
Kropotkin
Arminius wrote:The question misses nothing.
Peter Kropotkin wrote:K: a bit sensitive are we?
Arminius wrote:Peter Kropotkin wrote:the question also misses the little Russian problem.
Putin is bat shit crazy and could pull the trigger just to boost
his ego.
KropotkinArminius wrote:The question misses nothing.Peter Kropotkin wrote:K: a bit sensitive are we?
You are sensitive? Okay, then I give you a cuter example:
A: „How old are you, K.?“
K: „The question also misses the place where I was born.“
A: „The question misses nothing.“
....
Headshrinker: „K, would you please tell A how old you are?“
Arminius wrote:It is not advisable to consider, and especially to assess military and economy only separately.
Uccisore wrote:Arminius wrote:It is not advisable to consider, and especially to assess military and economy only separately.
Maybe not, but a military 'enemy' is not the same thing as an economic 'enemy', and to call two groups 'deadly enemies' is hyperbolic when talking about the latter sense.
In the sense in which NATO matters, the US and EU aren't enemies. In the sense in which they are economic 'enemies', there's nothing 'deadly' about it to provoke the comparison.
It would be like asking if New York or Massachusetts should seceed from the union because the Yankees and the Red Sox are 'deadly enemies'.
Arminius wrote:Uccisore wrote:Arminius wrote:It is not advisable to consider, and especially to assess military and economy only separately.
Maybe not, but a military 'enemy' is not the same thing as an economic 'enemy', and to call two groups 'deadly enemies' is hyperbolic when talking about the latter sense.
In the sense in which NATO matters, the US and EU aren't enemies. In the sense in which they are economic 'enemies', there's nothing 'deadly' about it to provoke the comparison.
It would be like asking if New York or Massachusetts should seceed from the union because the Yankees and the Red Sox are 'deadly enemies'.
No, that's wrong, and you know that it is wrong!
B.t.w.: What would you think, if your "friend" is vitsiting and at the same time robing you?
Arminius wrote:Uccisore wrote:Arminius wrote:It is not advisable to consider, and especially to assess military and economy only separately.
Maybe not, but a military 'enemy' is not the same thing as an economic 'enemy', and to call two groups 'deadly enemies' is hyperbolic when talking about the latter sense.
In the sense in which NATO matters, the US and EU aren't enemies. In the sense in which they are economic 'enemies', there's nothing 'deadly' about it to provoke the comparison.
It would be like asking if New York or Massachusetts should seceed from the union because the Yankees and the Red Sox are 'deadly enemies'.
No, that's wrong, and you know that it is wrong!
B.t.w.: What would you think, if your "friend" is vitsiting and at the same time robing you?
Uccisore wrote:[Maybe I don't have all the facts- if you think the relationship between the US and the EU is comparable to robbery, tell me how.
Arminius wrote:James S Saint wrote:Arminius wrote:Wernher von Braun was a Nazi - have you forgotten that? -, and after the World War II he was blackmailed: „either you help the USA or you will be put in prison“! His crew were also blackmailed. They all prefered to help the USA because they did not want to be jailed.
Other German scientists, technicians, engineers etc. were treated similarly - not only in the USA, but also e.g. in the USSR.
Do you have any references for that? (not that I seriously doubt it)
Yes, I have. And there are also documentary films and the fact that all these Germans came to the US in May 1945 and lived there in a city which was founded just for that reason. Google for example this: Operation Paperclip or Operation Overcast.104 German rocket scientists (aerospace engineers): Wernher von Braun and his scientists and engineers at Fort Bliss in Texas, USA, 1945.
Operation Paperclip was the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) program in which more than 1,500 German scientists, technicians, and engineers were brought from Germany to the United States for employment after the World War II. It was conducted by the Joint Intelligence Objectives Agency (JIOA). In other words: It was a criminal act, one criminal act of the other crimninal acts of the greatest raid of all time.
Nearly similar is the number of the German scientists, technicians, and engineers who were brought in the Soviet Union (USSR) after the World War II.
LaughingMan wrote:The European Union and central bank is the United States bitch.
NATO is the United States lapdog.
#=>|Arminius wrote:Do you remember what happened after the so called "Cold War" relating to the former members of the USSR? Many states of the erstwhile Eastern Bloc came back into the Western control, and the Westerners agreed to the Russian will to control all - except the Baltic - erstwhile members of the USSR. That was the deal. According to this deal it is not allowed that the ertswhle members of the USSR can also become a member of the EU, thus EUSSR.
LaughingMan wrote:So, you agree then Arminius with my statement?
Arminius wrote:LaughingMan wrote:So, you agree then Arminius with my statement?
Approximately, Laughing Man.
You said that the "European Union and central bank is the United States bitch", and Nietzsche said that the state is the coldest of all cold monsters. ("Staat heisst das kälteste aller kalten Ungeheuer." - Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche, "Also sprach Zarathustra", 1883, S. 57). Can monsters have bitches?
The Fed is even one of the main monsters, a private one and very schizophrenic.
You said that the "NATO is the United States lapdog" and I add: the lapdog is a very aggressive one and very schizophrenic.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users