Peter, communism (the KGB) was a police state and globalism is global communism. My defense, I enjoy being a USA citizen and am not willing to relinquish my freedoms that are guaranteed in its Constitution. I enjoy ownership: of things, cars, houses, property. I enjoy that in sovereign nations and capitalism there's no monopoly of corporate or government ownership which affords me choices to go live where I want, to work where I want, to buy what I want, to own what I want.
I'd go on but you cannot understand reality no matter how legitimate my standards are...nothing sane is proof enough for you. You do not live in reality only your make believe idealism and are a communist traitor to the USA government.
WendyDarling wrote:Peter wishes to abolish our nation, the USA. He despises his citizenship enough to support it being torn apart to enable a communist regime to lord over everyone globally. Such USA citizens are disgraces to our forefathers who gave us a government with checks and balances and many freedoms, and to all those who fought in order for him to have the very citizenship he wishes to abandon. Servicemen and women laid down their lives for his ungrateful ass.
Peter Kropotkin wrote:
dont tell us globalism is bad tell us why your positive beliefs are correct state why you are correct without attacking globalism
surreptitious57 wrote:Peter Kropotkin wrote:
dont tell us globalism is bad tell us why your positive beliefs are correct state why you are correct without attacking globalism
Nations are more manageable economically and socially and politically
They are the largest practical unit that can function independently
The existence of borders allows them a greater degree of security
They can maintain their own culture and customs far more easily
Peter Kropotkin wrote:Why is globalism bad?
WendyDarling wrote:Communists,
You do not live in reality only your make believe idealism. You do not live in reality only your make believe idealism. You do not live in reality only your make believe idealism. You do not live in reality only your make believe idealism.
Does any other government want a fucking traitor? We have millions of them in the USA that need to move out of the country they despise. Leave the USA Communists!
Ultimate Philosophy 1001 wrote:WendyDarling wrote:Communists,
You do not live in reality only your make believe idealism. You do not live in reality only your make believe idealism. You do not live in reality only your make believe idealism. You do not live in reality only your make believe idealism.
Does any other government want a fucking traitor? We have millions of them in the USA that need to move out of the country they despise. Leave the USA Communists!
Seriously, are we still doing the anti-communism thing? Thought that died out in the 50's.
Capitalism, and anti-communism, were both political propaganda tools to enforce servitude to tyranny. For instance, banana republics in the south, used the "anti-communism craze" to get the US to assist with their dictatorship and tyranny. Capitalism is the main reason globalism exists, they want a one-world-government in order for the banks to rule the entire planet. It's all about money and capital.
Ultimate Philosophy 1001 wrote:WendyDarling wrote:Communists,
You do not live in reality only your make believe idealism. You do not live in reality only your make believe idealism. You do not live in reality only your make believe idealism. You do not live in reality only your make believe idealism.
Does any other government want a fucking traitor? We have millions of them in the USA that need to move out of the country they despise. Leave the USA Communists!
Seriously, are we still doing the anti-communism thing? Thought that died out in the 50's.
Capitalism, and anti-communism, were both political propaganda tools to enforce servitude to tyranny. For instance, banana republics in the south, used the "anti-communism craze" to get the US to assist with their dictatorship and tyranny. Capitalism is the main reason globalism exists, they want a one-world-government in order for the banks to rule the entire planet. It's all about money and capital.
Void_X_Zero wrote:PKommunist now openly reveals that he is a paid Shill. He must be feeling very overconfident indeed.
His hand has been forced-- by what? By that which he discounts most of all, and will never see unto the ends of his days-- truth.
WendyDarling wrote:Ultimate Philosophy 1001 wrote:WendyDarling wrote:Communists,
You do not live in reality only your make believe idealism. You do not live in reality only your make believe idealism. You do not live in reality only your make believe idealism. You do not live in reality only your make believe idealism.
Does any other government want a fucking traitor? We have millions of them in the USA that need to move out of the country they despise. Leave the USA Communists!
Seriously, are we still doing the anti-communism thing? Thought that died out in the 50's.
Capitalism, and anti-communism, were both political propaganda tools to enforce servitude to tyranny. For instance, banana republics in the south, used the "anti-communism craze" to get the US to assist with their dictatorship and tyranny. Capitalism is the main reason globalism exists, they want a one-world-government in order for the banks to rule the entire planet. It's all about money and capital.
It's very much alive in China. However, communism under a corporate global government will happen rather than any capitalist spin, that's why I am vehement. Right now in the USA government, the corporations are only calling some of the shots, not all of them yet.
Peter Kropotkin wrote:I have been called a traitor for supporting globalism...
I have stated multiple times why I believe globalism is
the future...
but those who oppose globalism haven't given a defense of
their position... they have attacked globalism without giving
a defense of their position.... in other words, their beliefs are
negative, not any positive beliefs....so this is your chance....
don't tell us globalism is bad, tell us why your positive beliefs are
correct.... state why you are correct without attacking globalism....
Kropotkin
Void_X_Zero wrote:We already have all the good and working ideologies we need. Individualism, rationalism, secularism, liberty and natural human rights, free market localist capitalism, and minimal government highly constrained by a Constitution into separation of powers and limited to the sole purpose of protecting the rights and freedoms of the people.
The government does not represent the people, the people represent the government, and the government's only legitimate purpose and function is to protect the rights and freedoms of the people who are representative of that social political system. I think the problem is that the Founders saw government as properly representing the people, but this puts the power and initiative in the hands of government even if only indirectly, thus no amount of safeguards in the Constitution can protect you from that government expanding forever in its necessary role and function of "representing you".
Rather, the government needs to be defined as that which the people represent: the most rational, philosophical, sane and reality-oriented compact of laws designed for the sole purpose of instantiating and protecting the rights and freedoms of the people. The people representing themselves, in other words, with government merely a symbol of that.
WendyDarling wrote:Void_X_Zero wrote:We already have all the good and working ideologies we need. Individualism, rationalism, secularism, liberty and natural human rights, free market localist capitalism, and minimal government highly constrained by a Constitution into separation of powers and limited to the sole purpose of protecting the rights and freedoms of the people.
The government does not represent the people, the people represent the government, and the government's only legitimate purpose and function is to protect the rights and freedoms of the people who are representative of that social political system. I think the problem is that the Founders saw government as properly representing the people, but this puts the power and initiative in the hands of government even if only indirectly, thus no amount of safeguards in the Constitution can protect you from that government expanding forever in its necessary role and function of "representing you".
Rather, the government needs to be defined as that which the people represent: the most rational, philosophical, sane and reality-oriented compact of laws designed for the sole purpose of instantiating and protecting the rights and freedoms of the people. The people representing themselves, in other words, with government merely a symbol of that.
I agree that it should be how you framed it, but our government is corrupt and not representational of its majority but rather corporate greed.
Something new must be added into the mix so that we regain our alignment with sanity. There is no way for the citizens to police the Congress...they are free to be as corrupt as they wish to be (and that's pretty fucking corrupt currently) while in office from 2-6 years.
Who polices our Congress...themselves...that's laughable?
WendyDarling wrote:Your talking in terms of idealism not realism. Either we have a government of people who represent more people or we have no government, with literally no representation. I offered a new form of government and James S Saint offered his SAM Co-ops. An empty government has no ultimate decision makers or tie breakers and that won't do.
Return to Society, Government, and Economics
Users browsing this forum: No registered users