The United States, for example, makes sure that in Old-Europe everyone is ashamed as soon as he loves his country or - even worse - his people. In the United States itself, however, the country and the people should continue to be loved or just left. If one said in Old-Europe to leave Old-Europe, who does not love it, one would be exposed to the left-wing agitation directed by the USA: „right extremism“, „fight against the right-wing“, „Nazi“ and so on. That behind this there is nothing else than a geostrategy to keep the Old-Europeans down, so that the US-Americans can be free in everything they do, is only unclear to such people who cannot even reach IQ 10.
The US-Americans are so arrogant, must be so arrogant, because otherwise they will lose their position of world power. But they will lose it anyway - either in the short term or in the medium to long term. They don’t want to give up power, of course - they’d rather bomb away the rest of all human beings or kill them in some other way.
So, with regard to the Russian-Ukrainian war, one can be on one side or the other from the outset. This question, on which side one stands, is quite also a philosophical one, i.e. also and perhaps even particularly an ethical one. A democrat can never love a world power, in fact not even tolerate it. This is also true for any other representative of a form of rule, e.g. for an aristocrat or a monarch. It just does not apply to the one who has the world power. And because everyone who has the world power does not want to give it away but has to expand it in order to be able to keep it, others who have the possibility will want to oust the respective world power ruler. This has happened constantly in the history of mankind.
This Russian-Ukrainian war, which is a proxy war, is not about the question whether the USA or Russia will win it, but whether the geostrategy of the USA or the geostrategy of Russia will be successful and lead to the fact that China will replace the USA as a world power either quite soon or only later.
If one wants to judge the matter neutrally, then one must first remove the lying propaganda carried out by the media of the USA, by which above all Old-Europe is affected, because it is to be kept down. If this lying propaganda would be removed, the USA would immediately have Old-Europe as an enemy, because then most Old-Europeans would know how much they have been oppressed by the USA since 1945.
So - from the point of view of the USA - this lying propaganda of the media of the USA must be continued, even enormously strengthened, in order to be able to achieve the same result for Old-Europe in the future as from 1945 until today.
The Chinese are planning a new Silk Road, partly it is already built. Their intention is to dominate the whole of Eurasia and also Africa. Their lying propaganda in this regard is already underway.
If China will replace the USA as a world power, America would be only an island far away from Eurasia - at least from the point of view of the Old-Europeans and the rest of Europeans (Russians not included). This is what the U.S. is most afraid of: an alliance between Germany and Russia would then be possible again - as before 1914 - which England and the U.S. have tried again and again to prevent - since 1914 with success.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5SjPLJOjqc[/youtube][youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTYbGNFSE9Y[/youtube]
bing.com/videos/search?q=ge … ORM=VRDGAR
bing.com/videos/search?q=fr … 6a2066f4b3
A mentally ill person.
)! In the rest of the world it is exactly the opposite: not mendacious, but honest. There, you are only good if you have examined your conscience before every action and are sure that it is a good conscience.