AI: Designing The Ideal

So I’m creating an AI program for a game.

The process had me thinking about the connection between AI and Human goal-making. It’s about Idealism. Humanity is driven by animal-instincts, to avoid pain and chase pleasure, which are chemical Dopamine-hits that cause Euphoria. The base-form of Hedonism in Humanity is drug use and abuse. But the Natural forms are basic: defecating, urinating, sex (stimulating the prostate), and consumption – rising to the complex: Art, Music, Song, Dance, Literature, Exploration, Scientific Discovery, Athleticism, War Victories, etc. So there is a wide range of “Win-States” in Humanity, and in Biology, between a system of Reward (pleasure) and Punishment (pain).

Win-States (pleasure) and Lose-States (pain) are easily encoded by ‘1’ and ‘0’. A program that achieves an end goal Win-State of ‘One’, wins. A program that does not or cannot, loses.

Since such Goals and “Win-States” can be programmed into machines and software executables, then does it not also apply to Humanity one-to-one? And the answer is, yes, obviously. This is largely an instinctive and reflexive phenomena of Socialization, by which Ideals are (Memetically) transferred between Parent-to-Child, Teacher-to-Student, State-to-Subject, and God-to-Disciple. These are the most obvious and notable methods of Memetic-Transfer, but there are more.

This is how everybody on Earth, every society, culture, religion, group, etc… this is how every person receives their goals, ideals, and “Win-States”. Then, people work their way up a chain-of-success to achieve a Win-State (Ideal), according to the values, ethics, and morals of the subsequent group-identity. Because groups and individuals differ, there will be a competition of Ideals. Many people will not share same or similar Ideals. And of the Shared-Ideals, few people will agree on the means of achieving those such Ideals. The methods and means will vary, creating Different, Uniqueness, and “Individuality”. A person who “wins the game” with a novel method, quickly becomes Copied, and that method becomes “Meta”.

The more energy, specialization, time, studiousness, effort, risk, sacrifice, work, etc. required to attain an Ideal… (use Jesus Christ as an example) the more profound, astonishing, excellent, glorious, miraculous, etc. it becomes.

If an ideal (win-state) is “too high”, too lofty, then None attain it and everybody gives up.

If an ideal (win-state) is “too low” that anybody can achieve it, then few will remark or brag about it, since it gives no “social credit”.

Aside from all this, I’m interested in Novel and New ideals, new Idealism, new Win-States.

In the coming decades and centuries, building large colonies in space will become more realistic and attainable, making that a worthwhile ideal and Win-State for Humanity. But, until then, other ideals, goals, and victories must be relegated to something Lesser on Earth. Because people must pass their time on Earth until then.

The fortay of AI at this stage is to stick with probability as a form of fuzzy logic.

Go on…

Dr. James Lindsay: The Elites Are Trying To Build God In The Computer

Gnosticism - Judaism - Christianity - Marxism - Postmodernism - Wokism…
Immortality through digital codes.
Uniformity, the singularity shall be an incorporeal AI.

Again a redoubled logic, necessary and perceived as a flimsy apolitical redux.

But considering the existence of a soul, the replacement of such a substance, if it were a precondition to the being of existence, an advanced conclusion that such ideal modeling meant choice between life and death; , makes such advanced reconstruction a certainty, even if it wasn’t an automatic saving device?

Certainly such an entity could result in the reconstructed Absolute entity, going through constant and eternal processes to guarantee that an Absolutely immortal being would reassert the ideal existence of said Soul.

The magic holds that original systems of faith tied the civilizational collapse, if severed from other types of premordial early constructions.

The intervening variable search for authentically flow, has necessarily instituted authorities vindication, and that disrupted by the ebbing of images tied to imaginative natural sentiment creation, was undone by its soul-less quasi-natural reconstruction.

The so called simulated evolution of affirmative, higher levels of symbolism, attains to the image of an uncreated creator, where, the integrated parts are re-cognizef for their structural objective-a hidden transcendental energy, which can conceive the figure of it’s preformative pattern, but can not connect those integrals with any viable symbolic content.

At this level, it becomes meaningless to describe the content as being in any way different.

AI: replacing humans in 99% of the things humans do, but 99% of those same humans still have no idea how useless they now are :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

“We all actually are meant to serve society as socialists. … Your goal is … to die and to be reborn into the correct value system.” (Dr. James Lindsay => 5:17 ff.)

It reminds me of this:

you_are_here.jpg
Sleyor Wellhuxwell! Where are you?

Is the text on the photo from Dr. Ricardo Duchesne himself or a quoted one?

AI is already beating the turing-tests and “tricking” humans online who “cannot believe” they’re talking to a computer.

Most humans are dim/midwits; but that’s neither here nor there. AI will dominate, as it does in Chess, given the proper focus and allocation by computer programmers and developers. The money is there. The effort is there, and already underway.

I welcome the challenge, already AI is being used on some philosophy forums.