Video from an actual expert about Trump

youtu.be/Azck1jY79cA

It’s terribly sad and tragic for the world that American citizens can’t detect political pundits who have been paid to come up with the most extreme lies - but I guess it is a case of reaping what you sow. Fortunately at least one of the many exposed has been indited - many others now being paid by media organizations to directly lie on air for O’Biden - as much as they can muster - much harder to lie toward the positive - perfuming the pig.

This video was 3 years ago dude and he predicted everything Trump would do.

Mr Johnston was paid by the extreme leftist authoritarian newspaper The New York Times (who also supported the Nazis, Castro, and dictators across the world for the past 100 years). He was paid specifically to write a story article (which became a book deal) that would paint Mr Trump as the evil authoritarian - blame-shifting -
“always accuse your opponent of exactly what you are doing” - the Socialist motto.

What O’Biden has actually done in the last 10 months has proven to the world that Mr Trump was right - very right - and everything Mr Johnston was paid to write was exactly reverse (and very intentionally).

The ploy of always accusing your opponent of exactly whatever evil you are doing - or are about to do - has proven to work very well over the last few decades - both sides end up accusing the other - and that leaves it up to the media to choose the winner - that is the purpose of the scheme - invented by a socialist media mogul - Karl Marx - repeated by the Nazi socialist Goebbels.

Ms Clinton is a big fan of Saul Alinsky (a political strategist after Karl Marx - a California communist - similar to Kropotkin - except far more educated - just not very wise) and has promoted his books on how to influence an impoverished population (through properly strategic lies - “whatever works”). And it has now been proven publicly that Ms Clinton and the US Communist party (“democrats”) paid to create the Russia Hoax against Mr Trump because collusion with Russia is exactly what Ms Clinton was doing (along with Mr Obama, O’Biden", and many others). One man (one of her attorneys) has been indited specifically for that reason. You won’t hear about it in your MSM for simple minded Americans - you have to actually research.

“It’s terribly sad and tragic for the world that American citizens can’t detect political pundits who have been paid to come up with the most extreme lies - but I guess it is a case of reaping what you sow.”

Yeah I doubt America will ever produce a genuine, bottom-up proletarian revolution. Nor do I believe the ‘evolutionary’ socialists when they say it will come about gradually through reform. So I’m serious doubting socialism will ever happen in amnerika. Instead we’ll approach a more restrictive, authoritarian Chinese style state capitalism.

The ignorance of the apolitical man is exactly what inhibits anyone excepting the reactionary minority to dig deeper.

In my opinion, Marx’s ‘mysticism’ re: his contraindication of the Heglelian dialectic, lies on insubstantial ground That is why the only way to construct any substantial political effect to the orthogenesis of his assumptions is in reference to the Christian mystical underpinnings.

The formulation of the material conflict over the spiritual has nothing reasonable intrinsically, except the by the ones demonstrated above.

However, even with the necessary ontological demonstration present against Marx, the phenomenology becomes more relevant, hence supporteable by pundits becomes obvious.

The left wing position can not be intrinsically supported, but only by reference to the negation of the ontology.

This is true even from the point of view supported by the negation of the nothingness of ‘being’ in favor of existence.

The Marxist deontology was first Om ipresent with Sartre. A shallow retraction was forthcoming in response to the Hungarian Revolution.

This is key to understanding it, in my opinion.

But what happens to the 99% of the population who became apolitical and apathetic.