Warmongers argue we must protect Ukraine because it’s a “democracy”
Warmongers argue that we must protect Ukraine because it is a “democracy.” But they’re lying. Ukraine isn’t actually a democracy. To hold onto power, Ukraine’s president shut down the 3 TV stations that criticized him, and imprisoned the head of the opposition political party which came in 2nd place in the election, and arrested and jailed its leaders (exactly what Putin has been accused of doing)—all with the support of U.S.[/b]
Which side of the equation does bias rest; is not a far gone conclusion; for determinism appears as if it could be both , short term, yet hidden long term.
[b]Ukraine Conflict Centered Around Gas Pipeline – Of Course!
The Nord Stream pipeline, which was constructed to convey liquid natural gas from Russia to Germany, may run dry if the US government has its way. Suggesting that financial considerations may have played a role in the Biden administration’s refusal to negotiate with Russia, the attack on Ukraine will likely compel Germany to refuse natural gas from Russia and instead remain dependent on US-based suppliers.
Jimmy and The Grayzone’s Aaron Maté discuss whether the lives of Ukrainians are being sacrificed for the sake of American fossil fuel companies’ profits.[/b]
I think the leftwing populist position, that it’s just about money, while true in part, is overly simplistic and narrow, it’s also about the Great Reset/NWO.
Nonetheless leftwing and rightwing populists are both opposed to this insane war against Russia and insane wars in general for similar and different reasons, and tend to have more in common with each other than with shitlibs and neocons.
i had never heard of this dude until one day he mentioned one of my tweets on one of his shows or something and a whole bunch of weirdos came out of the wooddwork like cool bruh jimmy dore had your tweet on his show and i didn’t know wtf any of them were talking about.
I think the war on Ukraine has been designed, sanctioned, and funded by the authoritarian globalists (the ultra-wealthy and powerful - why wouldn’t they) and their appointed national leaders (O’Biden, Trudeau, Xi Jinping, Morrison, Johnson, Mercel, and so on). Currently the US administration (O’Biden) is collaborating with Mr Putin and Xi Jinping to try to ensure that as much damage to global democracy as possible can be obtained (especially in the US).
A part of that effort is the quite intentional delay of support for Ukraine. $10 billion is being prepared to send to Ukraine (at the right time) so that it and whatever US weaponry is included ends up in the hands of Russia (similar to the $84 billion given to Taliban). O’Biden is merely stalling until Mr Putin can assure a very quick victory immediately after the $10 billion is delivered and before Ukraine can effectively use it against him.
All US presidents before and after Mr Trump have been funding authoritarian aggression and undermining the West’s ability to maintain the ideas of freedom and democracy (most especially the US Constitution because of its inherent block against authoritarian socialism/communism).
It is very very clear that O’Biden makes no decision himself. He waits in Delaware until he receives instructions. Currently he is stalling and waiting for US Congress to demand that money be sent to Ukraine then he will wait for affirmation from Mr Putin that the time is right (the sanctions are just a ruse for the public). I think there is a good chance that Mr Putin is currently playing along to help incentivize the financial and military transfer. The intent is that in the end he will gain more than he loses (currently still one of - if not “the” - wealthiest people in the entire world).
This doesn’t mean that the entire charade is intimately designed - many interruptions, bumps, and detours occur - their power is not absolute. By incentivizing the right people at the right time they can step back and just mostly watch the chips fall. The goal is total authoritarian rule over the entire world (defining what “authoritarian globalism” means) - secretive manipulation until there can be no opposition - all of the governments and religions (if there is really any significant difference) seem to be a party to the end goal and have been for a very very long time.
“All the world is a stage and all the men and women mere players…” - William Shakespeare
I believe the Globalists (Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci, Davos/Bilderberg Group, George Soros, and all their Globalist Minions) have overplayed their hand with Covid-19 and the “vaccines”.
Now they’re exposed and out in the open. If they ever cared about Secrecy…they cannot any longer.
Putin’s offensive has been called a symbolic battle between “Nihilism vs. Traditionalism”. I’m inclined to agree with this assessment.
Who wants to fight and die for faggotry, homosexuality, transexuality, disease, pædophilia, and all this other bullshit these scumbags try to shove down our throats?
You might also want to keep in mind that Gov Cuomo and Mayor De Blasio both murdered far, far more people in New York than Mr Putin has murdered in Ukraine.
There appears to be nothing but murderous criminals running the world - hiding behind complicit media networks.
The asset management companies such as Black Rock,, Vanguard, State Street, Fidelity, Allianz and others on the one hand and the digital sector, which includes Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Alphabet, Facebook (recently: Meta) and others, on the other hand have merged with each other. You may call this fusion the digital-financial complex. The financial complex has uploaded its data to the digital complex, and the digital complex has its assets managed by the financial complex.
Which global players come into consideration for the globalist struggle? - On the side of tradition are mostly anti-traditional states or confederations of states; on the other side is the digital-financial complex. I have considered only the Western digital-financial complex. However, there is also an Eastern digital-financial complex that can rival the Western one, or at least could until recently. I am referring to the Chinese digital financial complex, which was recently put in check by the Chinese cenralist state to prevent power competition. The Chinese state has instead aligned itself with the Western digital-financial complex. Whether it will also disqualify it later, I don’t know, but I think this measure is strategically very significant. What other alliance options does China have if it no longer needs to fear its own digital-financial complex? For example, it has relatively good relations with Russia (in the case of China, a lot has to be put into perspective, because China has a much stronger tendency toward isolation than any other global player today), with North Korea, with Iran, with Southeast Asian, African, South and Central American states, and, compared to the West, better relations with India and also with Islamic states. If one assumes this constellation, which one does not have to, then China is better off than the West, which has only itself and some of its offshoots. There are in this constellation about 3-4 billion people on or at the side of China and 1 billion people on or at the side of the West. But where does the Western digital-financial complex tend to stand in this matter? It is, after all, about as strong as the Western states in terms of assets. But the Western states, as mentioned above, are in complete dependence on the Western digital-financial complex. That can be changed. But how? Almost all key functions are occupied in such a way that, at least at present, there is no question of the Western states or confederations of states separating or even disempowering the Western digital-financial complex. In addition, there is the whole inner disunity in the West with its decadent people, who are constantly racially incited against each other and especially also by immigrants or their “lawyers”, the same applies to the enmities between the sexes as well as between the old and the young, between the right and the left, between the non-poor and the apparently poor, between the upper class, which at least apparently represents the lower class, and the middle class, … etc. - everything staged, amplified to the extreme, in order to create as much chaos as possible (cf. the age-old motto: “Divide and rule!”), in order to once again steal the wealth of the middle class.
KLaus Schwab and Bill Gates are not the most powerful players. Moreover, Bill Gates was apprenticed to Klaus Schwab, as were Vladimir Putin, Angela Merkel, Manuel Macron, and many, many others.
But how would you interpret it if Putin is on the one hand the disciple of the Western globalist and technocratic transhumanist Klaus Schwab and on the other hand fights exactly against this globalism and technocratic transhumanism?
Noah Yuval Harari named three humanistic religions in some of his books (see, for example: A Brief History of Humankind, 2013; Sapiens, 2014 and 2020): (1.) liberalism; (2.) socialism; (3.) evolutionary humanism. Humanistic religions put the human being in the center and want to improve him. Most important for this are (1.) for liberalism the individual, (2.) for socialism the collective, (3.) for evolutionary humanism e.g. national socialism and transhumanism ( ). This is what the homosexual Jew Noah Yuval Harari says. He is an advisor of Klaus Schwab. Of all things, a homosexual Jew advises Klaus Schwab, whose father was decorated by the National Socialists for National Socialist services and enjoyed National Socialist privileges. A coincidence? Hardly. National Socialism and transhumanism, then, are most important to evolutionary humanism, which is one of the three humanistic religions centering on man and seeking to improve him. The faith, the religion, the idea, the idealism, the ideology of the human change is always directed also to the state of the technology. So, the three humanistic religions are also directed according to the state of the art. From this follows that transhumanism as the newest variant of evolutionary humanism is directed after the state of the technology of its time. Now it is so that the digital offers itself almost in a perfect way to carry out a human manipulation, particularly since also the rest of the technology can guarantee that implants, chips, nanobots are not rejected by the human body. So transhumanism wants manipulated humans (those 99.99% of all humans), and as slaves. The offer of technology is just too tempting. Besides, the “if-I-don’t-do-it, someone-else-does-it”-excuse helps.
Another Jew who also seems to be enthusiastic about the National Socialists is the Ukrainian President Volodomir Zelenskyy.
). This is what the homosexual Jew Noah Yuval Harari says. He is an advisor of Klaus Schwab. Of all things, a homosexual Jew advises Klaus Schwab, whose father was decorated by the National Socialists for National Socialist services and enjoyed National Socialist privileges. A coincidence? Hardly. National Socialism and transhumanism, then, are most important to evolutionary humanism, which is one of the three humanistic religions centering on man and seeking to improve him. The faith, the religion, the idea, the idealism, the ideology of the human change is always directed also to the state of the technology. So, the three humanistic religions are also directed according to the state of the art. From this follows that transhumanism as the newest variant of evolutionary humanism is directed after the state of the technology of its time. Now it is so that the digital offers itself almost in a perfect way to carry out a human manipulation, particularly since also the rest of the technology can guarantee that implants, chips, nanobots are not rejected by the human body. So transhumanism wants manipulated humans (those 99.99% of all humans), and as slaves. The offer of technology is just too tempting. Besides, the “if-I-don’t-do-it, someone-else-does-it”-excuse helps.