We can at least accept the stories of the saints as myths and legends that capture in narration the moral vision of the archetypal pattern and ideal of the Roman Catholic Church. The RCC is said to have documented cases in the tradition of Roman law. So I would expect RCC apologists to claim more. What can person with an open mind do but examine the evidence for their claims?
Meanwhile I’m happy to interpret the stories as myth and legend and suspend judgment about the historicity of the stories.
I like the one about Joseph the flying saint. Have you read about it?
I like the stories about the cephalophores, saints who got their heads cut off. It seems in depicting them artists couldn’t decide whether to put the halo around the head that the saint was carrying, or the halo around the top of the neck, where the head used to be.
No he was cryptic about it. But if you read his works you see that he was referring to the God of his experience over a lifetime. I think his book “Memories, Dreams and Reflections” is a good place to start.
…in the way they realise the catastrophic consequences in shifting all blame?
I think if octopi could live on land, they would be able to, too… I don’t know much about skunks, so do not know how you imagine them bettering humans?
Well that debate covered a lot of ground and spectrums… the Catholic Church is a force for good, but some within its ranks use it as a vehicle to commit their bad through.