A Final, Pantheopsychic Theory of Everything, END (PART 1)

A Final, Pantheopsychic Theory of Everything-CONCLUSION (PART ONE)

OF NOTE TO READER:

If you remember anything about the true nature of reality, remember this:

While the chronological order and form of God’s thoughts are unpredictable (as the content of God’s thoughts will always be unknown prior to replication in the mind of Man)….

…the content of God’s thoughts in terms of subject matter is predictable, as the content of God’s thoughts and experiences, whatever it is, must adhere to three psychic principles governing the formative and apparent expression of God’s mind:

[b]1. The Principle of Supernic Content of Consciousness

  1. The Principle of Lucidic Content of Consciousness

  2. The Principle of Crucific Content of Consciousness[/b]

Man, if indeed Man can do nothing but replicate the previous thoughts and experiences of God (which occur only in the form of lucid and non-lucid dreams and wakeful imagination), while the chronological order and form of Man’s thoughts, like those of God, are unpredictable (as the nature of the future is unknown)…

…the content of the mind of Man as replications of the content of the mind of God must adhere to three principles:

[b]1. The Principle of Supernic Perception

  1. The Principle of Lucidic Perception

  2. The Principle of Crucific Perception[/b]

That is, all human (and animal and insect, if these are not philosopher’s zombies) experiences are replications of Supernic, Lucidic, or Crucific consciousness. Everything a person does or will do is a replication of the subject matter indigenous to a particular type of the three types of God-consciousness.

At the end of things, everything that exists and can exist exists only in the form of that which is experienced by persons, and is caused by the real-time dispositions and apparent nature of God’s mind in one of three personalities and one of three states of consciousness. The mind of God, therefore, is the true nature of distal objects in the Process of Perception, and the percept in the Process is not caused by objects in the external world, but objects as they accidentally and absurdly appear beforehand in the mind of God.


I. THE TRUE NATURE OF HUMAN PERCEPTION: GOD AS DISTAL OBJECT IN THE PANTHEOPSYCHIC PROCESS OF PERCEPTION

A. THE FALSE (BUT COMMONLY BELIEVED) PROCESS OF PERCEPTION

The process of perception begins with an object in the real world, known as the distal stimulus or distal object. By means of light, sound, or another physical process, the object stimulates the body’s sensory organs. These sensory organs transform the input energy into neural activity—a process called transduction. This raw pattern of neural activity is called the proximal stimulus. These neural signals are then transmitted to the brain and processed. The resulting mental re-creation of the distal stimulus is the percept.

To explain the process of perception, an example could be an ordinary shoe. The shoe itself is the distal stimulus. When light from the shoe enters a person’s eye and stimulates the retina, that stimulation is the proximal stimulus. The image of the shoe reconstructed by the brain of the person is the percept.

-Wikipedia, Perception

B. THE ACTUAL PROCESS OF PERCEPTION: TRANSFERENCE OF INFORMATION FROM THE ONLY EXISTING DISTAL STIMULUS (THE MIND OF GOD) IN FORMATION OF THE ONLY EXISTING PERCEPT (THE MIND OF MAN) THROUGH THE PROCESS OF PSYCHIC MITOSIS

THE ANTIQUATED CONCEPT OF PSYCHIC MITOSIS

The Author previously conceived of Psychic Mitosis as the process of an experience (of God) not ceasing to exist when it is no longer be experienced by God that remains intact as a disembodied “ghost” experience that is not experienced by a person but exists in isolation from an experiencer as a floating, mental ding an sich (an inexperienced experience) that travels across mental space (mental space in previous iterations of Pantheopsychism an infinite space rather than the inner mind of a person that nevertheless tentatively “satisfies” Panpsychism as something that may “logically” exist if one calls the infinite space “mental” or “composed of first-person subjective experience). The “ghost” experience travels to God’s unconsciousness where it resides outside or independent of being the experience of a person until it becomes the experience of a person.

PSYCHIC MITOSIS REVISED

In the author’s current view, Psychic Mitosis is only Existence existing in such a way that it appears first as the experience of God, then appears next as the experience of God copied or replicated in the mind of Man. Thus there is no “ghostly” experience independent of an experiencer that “flies” or “travels” from the mind of God to the unconscious mind of God to “land” into the tabula rasa of Man: Existence just consists of transformations and permutations of subjective experience that takes one form and then another, and it is this transition of subjective experience that may be the only rational form of Psychic Mitosis.

Thus Man inherits the previous experiences of God through an irreducible process in which the experiences of God stops being the experiences of God and just becomes the experience of man: there is no longer the imagination of experiences existing outside or independent of experiencers (as if this were coherently conceivable), as there is only permutations of the God-substance in the form of the evolving experiences of God and Man.

THE ENVIRONMENT OF PSYCHIC MITOSIS: THE CONCEPT OF MENTAL SPACE AND INFINITY IN THE FORM OF EITHER A SINGLE PERSON CONTAINING MULTIPLE OTHER PERSONS OR MUTLIPLE PERSONS TAKING UP INFINITE SPACE

As existence demonstrates itself only in the form of persons, it is the simplest application of Occam’s Razor that existence happens to be so strange that only holistic persons exist, and if everything is mental and the circumscribed nature of persons indicates that mental space outside persons exists, the concept of mental space can be coherently (?) imagined to exist as the space or “head-space” inside a single Person that strangely and “just so” exists in such a way that the person in one Model of Infinity and a multitude of persons in a second Model of Infinity fills all interstitial space and displaces the existence of Nothing.

The displacement of Nothing requires something infinite. If the only thing that exists are persons, space and infinity itself consist and is filled by a multitude of persons in the form of either the Planar or Container Model of Infinity.

THE PLANAR MODEL OF INFINITY

The Planar Model of Infinity states the only thing that exists is first-person subjective experience in the form of either an infinite or nigh-infinite number of persons. The minds of persons are not finite in mental size but infinite, though infinite in direction from “east to west” but not “north to south”, as mental dimensions of persons abut or “touch” the dimensions of others immediately north and south to a person’s individual dimension.

The Planar Model works easily (despite the tentativeness of coherent conceivability of infinity or the concept of infinity) if there are an unlimited number of persons. It is not as easily conceivable if there is only a limited number of persons, but if Pantheopsychic theology adopts the Planar Model of Infinity at least as one of two possibilities of the structure of the external world, in order for God to logically provide the experiences of every non-God being that shall and can exist there must be a limited rather than unlimited number in order for God to have the “head start” of the Primordial Solipsism prior to the God-substance’s formation of the first non-God being. An infinite number and eternity of non-God beings would not allow a “First State” or “First Cause” of non-Godness.

(The Planar Model of Infinity involving an infinite number of persons could logically exist in Atheistic or Godless Panpsychism.)

The Planar Model of Infinity in the case of a limited number of persons, to avoid the existence of Nothing and mental non-person-ness or Atomism, would necessitate an assumption or even assertion of metaphysical possibility in which the sum total of non-God persons plus God Himself spatially stretches (in mental space as the only thing that exist is mentality) to infinity in the direction of east to west and north in terms of the northernmost border of the mental dimension of God and south in terms of the southernmost border of the mental dimension of the final non-God being.

The Planar Model of Infinity, like the Container Model explained below, is a member of the “Phantom Zone” of inscrutable and not-so-coherently-conceivable metaphysical possibilities that would stretch the limit of logical possibility if the concepts of infinity and eternity were themselves coherently conceivable. As the concepts of infinity and eternity are not coherently conceivable but merely assumed to exist, room can be made for the metaphysical possibility of Planar or Container Models of Infinity.

The Planar Model of Infinity necessitates that the Conscious Mind of God is a ‘continent’ of limited extend buoyed by an ‘ocean’ of the Unconscious Mind that is the planes or dimensions of the mind of every non-God being, whose content of consciousness is supplied by the primary ‘first dimension’ or ‘upper continent’ of God’s mind.

THE PLANAR MODEL OF INFINITY AND ACTS 17:28

The Planar Model of Infinity follows the spirit rather than the law of Acts 17:28 (‘for in Him we live, and move, and have our being’). The ‘spirit’ of Acts 17:28 in Pantheopsychism involves non-God beings ‘living’, ‘moving’ and ‘having our being’ within God only in the sense of God experiencing what it is like to be each non-God being in the Primordial Solipsism prior to the God-substance forming the first external non-God being (in infinite mental dimension or plane form). In this passive sense of Acts 17:28 we “are within” God in the Planar Model only in the sense of the content of one’s consciousness being within God in the sense of being something God experienced prior to replication of that experience in the form of non-God mental dimensions forming after the Primordial Solipsism.

THE CONTAINER MODEL OF INFINITY

The Container Model of Infinity follows the spirit and the law of Acts 17:28 in a metaphysical state of affairs in which infinity is filled with the ‘bowl’ or ‘ball’ of the Conscious Mind of God within which exists the Unconscious Mind of God, the innards of the ‘infinite ball’ that for the sake of denial of non-person forms of consciousness and the existence of Nothing, exists only in the form of the finite mental dimensions of every non-God being that, connected end-to-end within the external conscious mind of God, works to spatially fill the surrounding ‘ball’ of God’s mind.

In the Container Model, non-God beings literally live within God’s mind (satisfying the literal intent or interpretation of Acts 17:28), form the unconscious mind of God, and satisfies the spirit of Acts 17:28 in that Man literally lives within God and psychologically ‘lives’ within God in the sense of the content of the mind of Man being the previous content of the mind of God.

PREFERENCE OF THE CONTAINER OVER THE PLANAR MODELS OF INFINITY

While Part One of this dissertation more or less ruled in favor of the Planar Model of Infinity following a past in which the author unthinkingly favored the Container Model of Infinity, upon reflection given the inconceivability or lack of coherent conceivability of eternity and infinity, it turns out there is nothing wrong with the Container Model of Infinity in terms of imagining God’s conscious mind as not a limited ‘continent’ in an unlimited or infinite ‘sea’ or ‘ocean’ of unconscious mind (that in recent imagination is the population of Man rather than a teeming sea of mental particles), as one can imagine God’s mind as an infinite ‘bowl’ or ‘globe’ that conceals an inward ‘sea’ or ‘ocean’ of limited minds whose dimensions abut to form a ‘net’ that fills the inner infinity of the interior of the ‘bowl’ of the mind of God, that stretches to all outward possible existence.

The author, therefore, again favors the Container Model of Infinity over the Planar Model as the logically and metaphysically possible structure of the External World. Favor of the Container over the Planar Model is due to the Container being a more literal fulfillment of Acts 17:28: rather than God being yet another mental dimension or plane existing separate from and outside other mental dimensions forming the population of Man, the letter of the law of Acts 17:28 is obeyed in imagination of the conscious mind of God being an infinite and hollow ‘snow globe’ in which dwells the mind of every non-God being ‘living by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God’ by receiving the ‘daily bread’ of re-enacting and replicating the content of God’s mind.

Here as in the Planar Model remains the inscrutable process of the God-substance invariably and eternally forming the content of the mind of Man from the previous mind of God, “inscrutability” tentatively resolved in the simple imagination of Existence having a quality in which it absurdly exists “this way” before then simply existing “that way”, with the primacy and dominion of God over Man being the winning of God of an existential ‘lottery’ in which Existence uses Him as its face—Existence in the form of a Person or anthropomorphized Existence—such that Existence absurdly exists and can only exist as God replicating His experiences in the mind of Man.



II. THE TRUE NATURE OF HUMAN PERCEPTION—THE THREE PERCEPTS OF MAN DERIVED FROM THE DISTAL STIMULI OF THE THREE FORMS OF GOD

A. HUMAN PERCEPTION IN THE FORM OF CRUCIFIC PERCEPTION: THE CRUCIFIED MAN AS DISTAL OBJECT OF CRUCIFIC MAN AND THE CRUCIFIED MIND

And the angels which kept not their first estate but left their own habitation,
he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.

Jude 1:6

In common Fundamentalist thought the above verse is believed to refer only to the fallen angels that rebelled with Satan at the beginning of time, but if Pantheopsychic Theology is true the verse can arguably refer to human beings. Pantheopsychic Theology allows demons to exist, but their previous angelic status and voluntary leaving of their first estate is an event existing only in the non-lucidly dreaming mind of the Christ (as demons were not experienced or re-enactments of the consciousness of the Supernal but are constructs appearing only within the Sacrificial Dream experienced by Christ in the third-person, if Annihilism prevails). Humans, meanwhile, are previous Supernic ‘angels which kept not their first estate, but left their habitation’ involuntarily, in the transmutation of the Supernal (the first, evil-inconceivable personality and state of the Judeo-Christian God) into the Crucified Man.

1. THE CRUCIFIED MAN—THE DISTAL OBJECT THAT IS THE SECOND PERSONALITY OF THE JUDEO-CHRISTIAN GOD…THE UNWILLING SOURCE OF ALL EVIL

For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth,
visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities;
all things have been created through him and for him.

Colossians 1:16

In Pantheopsychic theology, God indeed created everything without exception. The method or process of “creating” or creation is progenitor experience: the contents of the mind of God are the primary permutations of the God-substance and are the only distal objects that exist. In the Pantheopsychic version of the Process of Perception the God-substance, through an absurd, “just so” law of existence can only replicate in other beings the previous thoughts and experiences of the Judeo-Christian God in one of three personalities and one of three states of consciousness.

Crucific perception or the Crucific percept in Pantheopsychic Process of Perception is the mental replication or representation of humans of the content of a dream in the mind of the Crucified Man: the state of the God-substance “just existing” in the form of (assuming the form and shape of) humans that re-enact the experiences of the Christ in the first-person, or the bodily performances and motions Christ experienced of others in the third-person, replicants of this version of Christ’s inner experiences while dying on the cross not having Christ-replication conscious experience, but only Objective Consciousness (to be explained in what follows).


For troubles without number surround me; my sins have overtaken me, and I cannot see. They are more than the hairs of my head, and my heart fails within me.

-Psalm 40:12

While Colossians 1:16 is true, there is one of three states of the consciousness God in which evil exists and can exist in which evil experiences occur to and within this version of God and are uncontrollable, and as such is a state in which God cannot deliberately and willingly create evil but does so accidentally and helplessly. This state of consciousness is Non-Lucid Dreaming.

Non-Lucid Dreams, the most common type of dream, is loss of perception of wakeful reality in the experience of a fanciful reality one is convinced is wakeful reality until one awakes. If Pantheopsychic Theology and Christianity is true, a viable (if not perfect) theodicy exists in which the “Gordian’s Knot” of the seeming logical impossibility of co-existence between a good or omni-benevolent God and the existence of evil (i.e. “The Problem of Evil”) is solved if God does not deliberately and willfully create Evil as Evil is indeed created by God if God created everything that exists without exception, but in the case of Evil God does so helplessly and uncontrollably. God creates Evil helplessly and uncontrollably (and Evil can only exist) if God creates Evil and can only create Evil while non-lucidly dreaming.

That is, in Pantheopsychic Theology there is a “just so” limitation and permutation of the God-substance that immutably ensures that Evil exists and can only exist as long as God non-lucidly dreams. Given this cosmic law of nature, Satan and his demons do not exist separately from God but depend upon God to non-lucidly dream their existence. The existence of Satan and natural and deliberate Evil, then, depends upon the longevity of God’s non-lucid dreaming and their presence within the mind of God while in that state.

If Pantheopsychic Theology is true, when God ceases to non-lucidly dream Satan, his demons, and Evil itself will cease to exist.

It’s too dangerous to do it. He’ll wake up in an instant…and destroy us.

-Evil mad scientist in the Z-movie: The Robot v.s. The Aztec Mummy


[b]2. ‘IF WE HAVE BEEN UNITED WITH HIM LIKE THIS IN THIS DEATH’…

JUSTIFICATION OF THE WICKED THROUGH THE WEARING OF CHRIST OF THE “DISGUISE” OF THE WICKED PERSON AND HIS OR HER ‘SINS’[/b]

Aren’t you aware that all of us who were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into His death? We were therefore buried with Him through baptism into death, in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, we too may walk in newness of life. For if we have been united with Him like this in His death, we will certainly also be united with Him in His resurrection.

-Romans 6:4

Beyond sustenance of the existence of Satan through non-lucid dreaming, the propositionally true message and mechanism of Christian Salvation is the secret that Man (all men in Universalism, some men in Annihilism) in terms of corruptible state and commission of sin does not exist in a vaccum, but is a re-enactment of the corruptible state and commission of sins committed by a non-lucid dreaming Christ who experiences the ‘sin-dream’ within another overarching dream in which God dreams of being a famous Jewish minister and celebrity unjustly suffering the Roman execution of crucifixion.

While dreaming of being a human suffering the physical rigors of crucifixion, the second personality of God, the Crucified Man, intermittently shifts from the “Matrix” of his execution to the “Matrix” of the Sacrificial Dream or Hell of Crucifixion, a non-lucid dream in which Christ dreams of being every human that shall ever exist (if the Christian doctrine of Universalism is true) or dreams of being certain humans while only outwardly observing and interacting with others he does not experience in the first-person (if the doctrine of Annihilism is true) in a psychic hell in which he non-linearly experiences every negative experience of every human that shall ever exist (Universalism) or every negative experience of every human He experiences in the first-person (Annihilism).

The world is an absurd place. Its figures and forms bespeak chaos without order, but an order nevertheless presides and is indeed implied by the ubiquitous and solitary appearance of first-person subjective experience, the only substance that demonstrates it exists, that only appears in the form of persons and that which persons experience. The existence of mental and physical pain, a crucial form assumed by first-person subjective experience, is a central aspect of human experience that in Pantheopsychic Theology and Christianity is created not by randomly existing non-mental atoms and molecules but by Christ dreaming of experiencing for Himself the pain of every human that shall ever exist or by the tragic auspices of the God-substance only those humans Christ can experience in first-person.

If, therefore, Pantheopsychic Christianity is true those who suffer do not suffer alone under in an indifferent universe or under an indifferent God, but have for all their lives did nothing but re-enact the suffering experienced in the mind of Christ Himself, in a non-lucid dream in which he is intermittently immersed between the Sacrificial Dream and his ‘external’ experience of dying on a cross.

The upshot of Pantheopsychic Christianity is that Man and God are psychically linked, as the experiences of Man are derived from the previous experiences of God, as God is the psychic lifeblood and progenitor of Man. The human condition and nature of one’s existence, then, are what they are because they were the absurd content that by the “just so” permutations of the God-substance happened to appear within and were experienced by God in one of three personalities and states of consciousness.

It is just this linkage, this re-enactment of the previous experiences in the mind of the Crucified Man, that gives rise to Crucific Perception, the perception and experience of mental and physical pain that are re-enactments of the previous experiences of crucified Christ. Crucific Perception enables the Principle of Justification.

3. THE PRINCIPLE OF JUSTIFICATION

Yet more impelling than any of these factors was Paul’s doctrine of Justification. As a Jew he had sought security through obedience to Moses’ law. Even afterward, he called this law “holy, righteous and good,” the true revelation of the divine will. But man does not obey God’s will. In particular, the law says “Thou shalt not covet,” and this demand for purity of inward desire is violated by every one, every day. So the law, divine as it is, cannot make us good, nor can it forgive us when we sin. In a word, the law cannot “justify”. Unless God intervenes and provides some other means to forgiveness and strength, man is doomed (Rom. 7). Just this justification, this forgiveness and moral strength, Paul found in Christ.

Here Paul drew an analogy from pagan mystery cults. Devotees of the latter sought by various rites (baptisms, sacred meals) to merge themselves into the life of one of the gods, and thereby to share in the god’s own immortality and divinity. The Christian, says Paul, interlocks his life with Christ’s, “dies” to the old, and “rises” to the new.

Therefore, when one joins himself to Christ, one accomplishes all that the law had aimed at: one in fact fulfills the law.

-NEW BOOK OF KNOWLEDGE ENCYCLOPEDIA, The Apostle Paul


jus•ti•fy /ˈjəstəˌfī/
verb

  1. show or prove to be right or reasonable.

  2. THEOLOGY:

declare or make righteous in the sight of God.

4. HOW DOES GOD ‘JUSTIFY THE WICKED’?

Regardless of the existence of either Universalism or Annihilism, God ‘justifies the wicked’ only in the sense that the secret behind the Principle of Justification is that the saved wicked owe their existence and evil nature to Christ, in the sense that Christ is the originator of their nature and fate as Christ uncontrollably and unwillingly non-lucidly dreamt of being the wicked person and having the person’s nature in the Hell of Crucifixion or Sacrificial Dream. The wicked that are justified by God, then, are those that have the nature they possess and have committed the acts they have due to their uncontrollable re-enactment of the nature and behavior of Christ within his mind while dying on the cross.

Ergo:

‘If we have been united with him like this in his death….’

-Romans 6:4


Or:

I have been crucified with Christ and I no longer live, but Christ lives in me.

-Galatians 2:20

If this is true, the Sacrificial Dream or Hell of Crucifixion in terms of content is not only what was done to Christ by certain humans (evil humans not justified by God as they were/are not experienced in the first-person by Christ in the Sacrificial Dream if Annihilism exists): the suffering of Christ on the cross occurred also in the evil nature Christ assumed in the forms in which that nature manifest during the Sacrificial Dream, which while manifest in Christ is not evil qua evil but evil considered by God to be Christ’s suffering. Christ suffering the experience of what it is like to be evil; Christ suffering what it is like to experience the sins of those who follow his psychic footsteps, that by following these footsteps are cosmically joined at the hip with Christ and can do nothing but follow the trajectory of His mind.


For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin;
that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.

-2 Corinthians 5:21 (King James Version)

If the Sacrificial Dream or Hell of Crucifixion exists and Christ justifies the wicked by being the originator of their evil and evil nature which they can do nothing but re-enact, Christ suffered in the Sacrificial Dream as the original “worst of the worst” (His intermittently emerging true mind horrified at what he was doing to others and what he suffered at the hands of others within the Sacrificial Dream’). The justified wicked, born into the crucifixion, are forced to re-enact the experiences within the mind of the Crucified Man.

This is hard stuff not for the squeamish: when the Bible states that Christ ‘was made to be sin’ or “became sin” (2 Corinthians 5:21 above), it wasn’t kidding around. The justified wicked, then, amazingly includes certain (Annihilism) or all (Universalism) murderers, rapists, even pedophiles:

I am scorned and despised by my neighbors–even my friends are afraid to come near me. When they see me on the street, they run the other way.

Psalm 31:11 (New International Version)

Such is the nature of the Hell of Crucifixion and Sacrificial Dream (it isn’t the “Hell of Crucifixion” for nothing). The evil (suffering) assumed by Christ in his mind while dying upon the cross, in the transmutation of the Supernal into the Crucified Man, is re-enacted upon the former Angels that ‘kept not their first estate but left their own habitation’ due to their helpless transformation from pre-mortal humans that re-enacted the thoughts of the 1st personality of God, the Supernal, into re-enactors of the sufferings of the mind of the Crucified Man, in his unwilling creation and maintenance of the existence of Evil.


For at just the right time, while we were still
powerless, Christ died for the ungodly.

Romans 5: 6-8

The phrase, ‘while we were still powerless’ means the possibility that the God-substance could or would have formed the wicked in totality with Objective Consciousness absurdly destroyed in Gehenna without ever being re-enactments of the sufferings of Christ. In the Sacrificial Dream, the God-substance saves Man (or only certain humans if Annihilism exists) by binding Man with Christ through the evil of Justified men being ultimately re-enactments of the ‘evil’ of Christ, experienced within his mind while dying on the cross: Christ ‘tasting the death (spiritual death) of every man’ (Hebrews 2:9) by knowing what it was like to be even the worst human being (if that human is Justified).

For make no mistake, the works of the Crucified Mind are these:

  1. Christ’s experience in the first-person of the Pain of every Body that suffered Pain in Ailment and Violence

  2. Christ’s experience in the first-person of the Thoughts and Emotions of every Person having Pain of the Body in Ailment and Violence

  3. Christ’s experience in the first-person of every Emotional of Pain independent of Pain of the Body

  4. Christ’s experience of every false and erroneous philosophy of Existence, including the nonsense of the purported existence of that which is not/is other than subjective experience, nonsense of the brain’s creation of consciousness, and nonsense of godless death

  5. Christ’s experience of every religion and every metaphysical belief expressed in the words of others that are not Pantheopsychic theism, for every religion, belief, philosophy, and thought regarding the nature of reality that is not of Pantheopsychism and Pantheopsychic theology is Incarnate Error.

Our replication of these Works is replication of the Lord’s Death. Independent of the things Christ experienced in the first-person, there nevertheless possibly exists consciousness within the unconscious mind of the Crucified Man the Crucified One cannot and did not experience in the first person, such that, if Man indeed exists within the mind of God, there is consciousness that does not duplicate or replicate the previous content of the consciousness of God in the sense of being replications of the first-person experiences of God, but are non-replicated consciousness that by its God-substance given nature must nevertheless reference and interact with God: Objective Consciousness.


5. CRUCIFIC PERCEPTION AND OBJECTIVE CONSCIOUSNESS: FIRST V.S. THIRD PERSON CHRIST-EXPERIENCE AND THE POSSIBILITY OF ANNIHILISM OVER UNIVERSALISM

The world of natural and deliberate evil randomly existing in the mind of the Crucified Man is a closed system, a universe-unto-itself, a tale with beginning, middle, and end containing the totality of the existence of Pain in the forms of Freudian anxiety and physical and emotional trauma.

Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God…

-Romans 3:25

[b]6. THE BLOOD!

The Blood, the emotional trauma of Christ manifest in the myriad forms he wore in his mind while dying on the cross, is the central load-bearing column supporting the monolith of the Hell of Crucifixion, whose central theme is the continuous, seemingly neverending emotional murder of Jesus Christ, fundamentally wrought by the tragic permutations of the God-substance in the form of those that shall be here called Christ-Slayers or Crucifiers—human beings with Objective Consciousness (if Annihilism is true) that exist for the sole purpose of carrying out and ensuring the ‘physical’ and emotional trauma of Jesus Christ, the continuous perpetration of the gamut of ‘physical’ and emotional trauma suffered by Christ in the various human identities he wore within the Sacrificial Dream.

Christ-Slayers or Crucifiers, if they exist, may, if their aim is to strike at Christ himself in the understanding that the people they target, torment, and kill are re-enactors of the various guises worn by Christ in the Sacrificial Dream, may indeed adhere to the concept and religious themes of Pantheopsychism and Pantheopsychic Christianity in the negative. “Dark Pantheopsychists” that certainly do not have the ‘faith in Jesus’ necessary in Romans 3 for transformation of mind from Crucific to Supernic existence, but adhere to Pantheopsychism in an alternate theory that the Crucified Man will never revert or return to Supernic state, and that the Hell of Crucifixion is eternal and they are its maintenance, Christ dying and suffering for eternity rather than temporarily.

If Pantheopsychic Christianity and theology is true, every human that exists exists in the form of either Christ crucified or one who crucifies Christ, in the metaphorical sense of directly or indirectly causing Him emotional pain along the spectrum of Freudian anxiety to unforgettable emotional trauma in whatever human form He happens to wear in his mind while dying on the cross. The circumstances of the causation of that pain occur as specific narratives in which the sacrificial Christ-human (crucified Christ dreaming of being a particular not-yet- existing-outside-the-Sacrificial Dream-human) invariably walks into a situation in which the individual is ‘physically’ and/or emotionally slaughtered. A trip to the corner store with one’s child, happily asking childish questions on a sunny day, is interrupted as the child is fatally struck by a car. A mass shooter strikes, mocking the entire purpose of a loved one’s existence as a bullet smashes through the person’s head. The sacrificial narrative is designed (accidentally by the God-substance in its autonomous and unthinking formation of the Crucified Man, his Crucific experiences, and the later-existing Crucific Perception of Man) to emotionally as well as ‘physically’ murder Christ in the form of unbelievable emotional distress: people known and loved by the Christ-human appear in the Sacrificial Dream only for the purpose of causing Christ irrecoverable emotional trauma through their loss.

Listen to my prayer, O God,
do not ignore my plea;
hear me and answer me.
My thoughts trouble me and I am distraught
At the voice of the wicked,
for they bring down suffering on me
and assail me in their anger.

My heart is in anguish within me;
the terrors of death have befallen me.

Fear and trembling have beset me;
horror has overwhelmed me.

I said, “Oh, that I had the wings of a dove!
I would fly away and be at rest.
I would hurry to my place of shelter,
far from the tempest and storm.”

-Psalm 55: 1-8


OF OBJECTIVE CONSCIOUSNESS AND THIRD-PERSON EXPERIENCE

Objective consciousness outside Pantheopsychic Theology is the hypothetical notion that consciousness can in principle exist in “non-living” objects, such that inorganic matter can or might possess first-person subjective consciousness. The hypothesis is arguably not taken seriously by most, as it is generally believed that inanimate objects such as chairs, papers, cars, buildings, and so on do not have consciousness.
In Pantheopsychic theology, objective consciousness has less to do with the question of whether or not inanimate objects have consciousness and more with the hypothetical existence of humans (and non-human conscious beings) that are considered by God to be objects rather than persons, as Christ does not experience what it is like to be such persons.

7. TWO TYPES OF OBJECTIVE CONSCIOUSNESS IN PANTHEOPSYCHISM

In Pantheopsychism there are two types of Objective Consciousness:

a. NON-SUBJECTIVE CONSCIOUSNESS

Non-Subjective Consciousness in Pantheopsychism is “non-subjective” in the sense that ‘physical’ objects such as chairs, tables, coffee pots, etc., do not have their own consciousness or first-person experience or view of themselves and the world, but nevertheless are composed of the consciousness of persons. That is, inanimate objects “have consciousness” only in the form of the third-person perception of ‘physical’ objects from the point of view of one perceiving such objects.

In Panpsychism ‘physical’ objects only exist and are only experienced or perceived in the third-person, i.e. in the form of how they appear (and feel, smell, sound, etc.) to an experiencing being, as ‘physical’ objects are ultimately only constructs composed of the material or “matter” of the subjective experience of the person observing them. As they do not have objective existence but are only part of the subjective field that makes up a person, inanimate objects have no objective existence independent of persons but are only illusions or invented constructs that act as furniture on the “theatre stage” of the consciousness of a person. Objects, therefore, do not have experiences, but can only be experienced and are therefore only an aspect of the person experiencing them.

The “consciousness” of objects, the only type of consciousness that logically exists, is here called: Non-Subjective Consciousness (as this type of ‘non-consciousness’ is ultimately only the consciousness of an experiencing observer in the form of experienced objects)

b. PANTHEOPSYCHIC NON-REPLICATIVE CONSCIOUSNESS

Objective consciousness in Pantheopsychism exists primarily and importantly in the form of beings having consciousness and first-person subjective experience, but possess consciousness that does not replicate the prior experiences of the Judeo-Christian God in the case of inner mental and emotional experience, but replicate the experience of the Crucified Man only in the case of replicating the sensory environment created by the God-substance as the stage surrounding and providing the backdrop of the mental and emotional experiences of the Crucified Man.

That Objective-consciousness possessing human beings (and non-human conscious beings) are mentioned in the context and vicinity of the Crucified Man and the Lucid Dreamer and not the Supernal is telling—for Objective-consciousness possessing human beings are not transfigured prior Angels of the Supernal, and as such are destined in the reversion or transformation of the Crucified Man into an immutable form of the Supernal for an “atheistic” form of death in the unanimous loss of first-person subjective experience in the fire of Gehenna, and its transformation in this final fire into the subjective experience of newly instated Angels of the Supernal, as only aspects of their third person sensory experience.

Persons having Non-Christ-Replicative Consciousness or Non-Replicative Consciousness exist only in the Sacrificial Dream or Hell of Crucifixion and the external, “watered down” version of the Sacrificial Dream called The Revised Hell of Crucifixion. The only beings with Non-Replicative Consciousness (Non-Replicative Consciousness existing only if Annihilism is true) are human Crucifiers, Satan the Devil, and the legion of demons that “fell with Satan at the beginning of the time” (more on the true, Pantheopsychic nature and origin of Satan and his demons in the dissertation: God of This World).

Non-Replicative Consciousness must eventually and inevitably “cease to exist” through transformation into Non-Subjective Consciousness (as there is no brute cessation of existence of consciousness in Pantheopsychism).


8. NON-REPLICATIVE CONSCIOUSNESS AND ANNIHILISM

The doctrine of Annihiliationism or Annihilism states that the soul is not inherently immortal but must be imbued with immortality from God. As a result, the soul of those not granted immortality by God can in principle cease to exist and indeed do cease to exist in the fire of Hell. The damned in Annihilism do not burn forever in writhing torment in the fire of Gehenna but are obliterated by that fire from existence, as according to Romans 6:23 immortality is a gift from God and is granted only to the saved.

The Apostolic Fathers

As already noted, while some Early Church Fathers revealed they interpreted the bibilical language to refer to eternal torment, the Apostolic Fathers nowhere did this. However, on at least a couple of occasions the Apostolic Fathers gave us a glimpse into how they interpreted the teaching of Jesus and the writers of the New Testament. One good example is Ignatius of Antioch, a student of the Apostle John. Ignatius wrote a letter to the Ephesians in which chapter 17, “Beware of false doctrines,” reads as follows:

For this end did the Lord allow the ointment to be poured upon His head, that He might breathe immortality into his church. Be not anointed with the bad odour of the doctrine of the prince of this world; let him not lead you away captive from the life which is set before you. And why are we not all prudent, since we have received the knowledge of God, which is Jesus Christ? Why do we foolishly perish, not recognizing the gift which the Lord has of a truth sent to us?

Less than a century later Tatian wrote that the lost will be “immortal,” and those who affirm the doctrine of eternal torment have no trouble recognizing what he was saying: That the lost would be alive forever, albeit in a terrible state. Ignatius here claimed, by contrast, that immortality is Christ’s gift to his church, and that to “perish” means to not receive the gift. If traditionalists interpret immortality to mean the same thing in both cases, they must conclude that while Tatian thought the lost would live forever, Ignatius did not.

Ignatius confirms that this was his view in his letter to the Magnesians in chapter 10, exhorting them, “Let us not, therefore, be insensible to His kindness. For were He to reward us according to our works, we should cease to be.” It is impossible to reconcile the view that the lost will not receive immortality and the reward of sinful deeds is to cease to be on one hand with the view that the lost will be punished for their sin with eternal torment in hell on the other. Knowing that this teaching was alive and well among the Apostolic Fathers makes it all the more likely that the writer of the Epistle of Barnabas was making the same point in chapter 21:

It is well, therefore, that he who has learned the judgments of the Lord, as many as have been written, should walk in them. For he who keeps these shall be glorified in the kingdom of God, but he who chooses other things shall be destroyed with his works. On this account there will be a resurrection, on this account a retribution. I beseech you who are superiors, if you will receive any counsel of my good-will, have among yourselves those to whom you may show kindness: do not forsake them. For the day is at hand on which all things shall perish with the evil (one).

-Gregory A. Peoples, History of Hell: Hell Before Augustine


While the “truth” of Annihilism/Annihilism is biblically supported in at least two different verses:

For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God
is eternal life
through Jesus Christ our Lord.

-Romans 6:23

And:

For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.

-John 3:16

There are biblical verses that (seemingly) support Universalism. Universalism is supported in one of the most beautiful and optimistic verses in the Bible regarding the ultimate salvation of man:

This is good, and pleases God our Savior, who wants all men to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth. For there is one God and one mediator between God and mankind, the man Christ Jesus, who gave himself as a ransom for all people. This has now been witnessed to at the proper time.
-1 Timothy 2:3-6

But according to the Law of Non-Contradiction and the film, The Highlander:“There can only be one”.

Pantheopsychic Theology attempts to solve the contradiction (of the co-existence of biblical texts supporting Annihilism and Universalism) through the proposition of Non-Replicating Consciousness (while holding the possibility that straightforward Universalism may yet exist in the absence of Non-Replicating Consciousness).

In Pantheopsychic Christianity there are two types of human beings: Christ-Replicative and Christ-Non-Replicative. If ‘the gift of God is eternal life through Christ Jesus our Lord’ there are some humans that are in fact immortal by reason of Christ-replication, such that by being forced from birth to replicate the content of consciousness of the Crucified Man and the Lucid Dreamer, this type of human accidentally inherits ‘eternal life through Christ Jesus our Lord’. This class or species of human, born from a woman with a finite past but eternal future is a byproduct of the person being made to replicate the inner (mental and emotional) experiences of Jesus Christ in Crucific and Non-Crucific form. This inextricable bondage to Christ renders a person effectively immortal, following a previous Objective Consciousness in the Primeval Solipsism of God before the consciousness of Man.

Conversely, if ‘the wages of sin is death’, there are some humans that, by reason of being Christ-Non-Replicating are indeed classically mortal and will die not in the classic atheistic sense of one’s consciousness ceasing altogether to exist, but in the sense of having one’s consciousness transform from person-consciousness to non-subjective consciousness: one’s consciousness ceases to be “that which experiences” as it transforms into an aspect of the consciousness of another person in the form of an aspect of something perceived in the third-person, namely, an inanimate object and objects.

Persons with Christ Non-Replicative consciousness, therefore, inevitably and eventually cease having first-person subjective experience and become only the subjective experience of others in the other’s perception of non-person inanimate objects, experienced by the surviving person in the third-person in the way the original Christ Non-Replicative human was first perceived by Christ in the third-person within the Sacrificial Dream.

And whosoever was not found written in the Book of Life
was cast into the Lake of Fire.

-Revelation 20:15

The mechanism of this transformation is the psychic melting of Christ-Non-Replicative/Christ-slaying consciousness in the Lake of Fire (biblical Hell whose proper name is Gehenna). In Pantheopsychic theology, the final experience of all Christ Non-Replicative Christ-Slayers is experience of the vision and heat of roaring Gehenna.

We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.

-1 Corinthians 2:6

If Annihilationism or Annihilism exists, certain humans by the “just so” permutations of the God-substance are accursed, so to speak, with the second type of Objective Consciousness: consciousness that cannot be experienced by God in the first-person and as such, given the primacy of God and God-replicating humans in the evolution of the nature of reality, possess disposable consciousness considered as trivial as non-conscious ‘physical’ objects.


END OF CONCLUSION PART ONE-PLEASE PROCEED TO CONCLUSION PART TWO