I have at least 10 socket-puppet accounts I use dailyā¦I have no lifeā¦no jobā¦I just sit on ILP under a bridge, hungry and cold and wait until MagsJ replies to my posts.
I see where the misunderstanding lies. I wasnāt castigating you for attacking Polish Youth, I was castigating you for your behavior outside of this thread (your post in that Gibās thread being an example.)
Not Gib, but him: Ban Sculptor! Sculptor ist the one who is not capable of philosophizing, only capable of using AD HOMINEMS in communist command form, of trolling and of stalking. So why should we let someone like him tell us anything? Ban him or, because ILP has no moderation anymore, ignore him!
It is always the same: Sculptor has no other āargumentsā than āAD HOMINEMSā.
And if he is asked about this problem (which is only seldom the case), then he has only excuses, e.g. like now again: āthere is no philosophy hereā - if he really misses philosophy (what one can doubt very strongly!), then one asks oneself immediately: why does he post here? He does not want philosophy, but a projection surface, a projection surface to get rid of his permanent frustration.
Said by the one who means by āphilosophyā personal attacks, ad hominems, trolling, stalking, and commanding communist ideology, which has nothing to do with philosophy. Wisdom and truth have to do with philosophy; so philosophy is something you know nothing about. You only know spreading communist ideology, communist commands, personal attacks, ad hominems, trolling, stalking.
I simply can not connect the idea of sock poppets to what"s going on with Polish Youth, generally speaking, thatās all Decode.
This in my mind smells almost like a circular attempt to avoid identifying of the self, precuresly, almost as modus opetams, a way to loose oneās self,.
But maybe thatās not it. Characters like to imagine others within oneās self like in 6 characters in search for an author.
I donāt know
If this is so, it may not be conducive to thematic unity, the focus is lost. Of course where the search slides toward a forward looking objective agreement, then it mag not be a case of avoiding a probable scenario, literarily speaking, but suggests a an internal struggle for a need to shift focus back into familiar situations, implying a no exit existential. context, a nihilistic self abandonment of sorts.