Alf wrote:
You have misquoted me, Mr. Meno.
It is not allowed to misquote someone. You have done it so even three times.
I never said what you put between my lines and made it look like a quote.
You have made yourself guilty by misquoting me, probably even intentionally.
“You can now be legally prosecuted. Remember that anything additional you say from now on can also be used against you”
me no says:
Akf, Yor charge has no merit , for the following reason:
I write from a subquality phone, have problems with visual and other technical co-modities, and finally, have not acquired the necessary know how to place replies into the proper boxed format.
I usually use >>>>>>>>>>>> and other designated signs to deliniate and separate a comment from a reply, but sometimes forget that.
Other problems associated with literacy, also may have appearent examples in my writing, but even though, I try to edit mistakes out, most often it is a matter of my schedule and not a state of carelessness that brings that about.
As far as this being an example of intentionally cover illegal attempts to utilize others’ s work toward my iwn credit, well that really is as far from the truth as one can get.
Best regards Alf, and thank You, but if I may add, even your intention to point the above out to me, is more bearing implicitly of my weakness.not to ascribe it to giving the wrong impression of letting misguided impressions form the narrative , instead of reducing possible shades of meaning into unintended associations.
If, for instance, that view, above is the correct interpretation I am getting from Your message, or even if, in spite of the above, Your warning still stands, please indicate the way or another, so as to enable me to make the correct understanding if the situation.
In any case, the onus is in You, Alf, to clear the aur of Your precise meanings, charges , so that things may become more understandable.
Thank You.