Sauwelios – Flat time space is un-curved time space. That shouldn’t be too difficult to understand.
“There is no subject of will to power. The will to power is encroaching subjects, or force moving outward from centers. The phrase “encroaching units” is not an answer to the question “who wants power?” or “who feels pleasure?””
Of course it is. Either that or you believe in a metaphysical bond between these units, i.e. in God.
““And how can anything posit itself? I’ve asked this question, in different forms, multiple times already, but this suggestion of absurdity has been conveniently ignored.””
How can anything exist if it does not posit itself? The notion “it is simply there” is what is absurd. There is no “simply is”. There is only acting, positing. And I have answered the question, several times: by accident, enabled by the absence of its active impossibility.
This is logic, driven to its extreme. Which means not to rely on it faithfully, expecting it to give you the answers. Logic can only naturally flow forth in explanation to the extent that we expect that the universe is part of a duality, a yes and a no.
I have subjected logic to the term which’ meaning is fundamental to it: value.
“Nothing is fundamental to itself.”
Thank you. I will file this statement, along with “will to power cannot be further analysed.” under “Sauwelian law”, and may use this file in the future to explain why a certain type of thought cannot attain to value-ontology.
Cezar – Was labert der Honk?
Pezer – Better than science? No, furthering science, from a bringer of objectivism/nihilism to a handmaid of philosophy.