Anti-entropic was the my first thought concerning the MCR, “Maximum Change Rate”, which spawns the sub-atomic particle to grow. And anti-entropic is what it is. So I started to say that a sub-atomic particle was anti-entropic, but something seemed wrong with that. Then I realized that the particle itself, although formed because of anti-entropy, is not anti-entropic, but merely void of entropy.
I couldn’t find a word for that other than merely “stable”. But the word “stable” didn’t really relay the deeper truth of it, that it was stable because of the detailed, finer anti-entropy countering the entropy. So I chose to form and use the word “anentropy” so as to relay that its stability was very directly tied to an issue of entropy, but opposing the common promoted notion that entropy is ever present and always wins. It doesn’t win when it comes to sub-atomic particles or anything that functions on the principle of the MCR.
Anentropy meant to me that when riding a bike, one neither leans too much to the right (anti-entropy) nor too far to the left (entropy). The objective is to remain stable, balanced and thus be able to sway and steer without falling, defeating demise, failure, death - anentropic.
So online, I emphasis “anentropy” and when asked by someone who doesn’t know anything about the issue at all, I just give the short (not pedantically accurate) response, “It just means anti-entropy” because to those who only believe in entropy as the god of all nature, it really does mean the necessary presence of an anti-entropic force of some kind. But because you got into the finer meanings involved, I have been discussing anti-entropy vs anentropy… with you.
So yes, if you had not mentioned anti-entropy, neither would I have.
But now that you have, I think we can agree. Anentropy is the goal-state, the ideal. Most others have been programmed to believe only in the omnipotence of entropy (a seemingly necessary thought in socialism; “because of the omnipotent god Entropy, “the Devil”, “the terrorist”, YOU NEED US!!!”). Well, something is certainly needed, but it doesn’t seem to be the same “us” as is promoted. What is needed is balance, stability, Anentropy throughout… Antentropia.