There could be other possible reasons to not allow free energy. I’ve heard multiple people present the argument that the moment it is found is the moment we blow our selves up. Many Scientists worry about being the next creators of a nuclear bomb like device. One with unlimited energy instead of just a lot…
Free energy devices have been around for decades. The device that “blows everyone up” is the black-hole devices created for power, not energy (power being the concentration of the energy).
I once knew a guy that believed that you could add a device to a car engine, which made it possible to run the car on tap water rather than petroleum.
Those ‘evil’ oil companies has suppressed the development of such devices, and so everyone was forced to pay the exorbitant prices for petrol at the pumps!
These and all such “free energy” devices presumably have all been suppressed to further the vested interests of the multinational protectors of the status quo.
And “unverifiable” means “anything I don’t believe” which is determined by normalcy bias and mainstream media.
In my particular case (which I don’t even discuss), in 1972 during the “we need energy” false flag, I personally designed what I thought was the first truly perpetual energy source, only to discover that a few others had come even before me in other ways but buried under a hell of a lot of obfuscation and demonizing (largely by displaying silly efforts of morons in order to promote disrespect for all efforts - a common method for hiding a truth). I suspect that I still hold the most ecological design.
If it is true that oil and natural gasoline are more inorganic than organic products, then it is also true that peak oil is a lie and the energy source will as long exist as the planet Earth.
In that case we merely would have to eliminate the lie. The lie is a problem humans can’t resolve.
If I had not read it, then I would not have responded to it.
Strange that you are unable to answer a direct question.
I assume that you think oil contains carbon atoms so it is not inorganic in that sense. So you must mean that oil does not come from dead plants and animals. Therefore you are talking about abiogenic oil.
I did answer your question, but you are unable to read ( ). That’s strange. In addition: English is your mother tongue, isn’t it?
The abiogenic hypothesis “fell out of favor at the end of the 20th century because” the Soviet Union was defeated, the “Cold War” ended, and the western age of total globalism started. You know what I mean?
Inorganic chemistry is the study of the synthesis and behavior of inorganic and organometallic compounds. This field covers all chemical compounds except the myriad organic compounds (carbon based compounds, usually containing C-H bonds), which are the subjects of organic chemistry.
Abiogenesis is the natural process by which life arose from non-living matter such as simple organic compounds.